Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Readings from the other desks

The space baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

17 min read0 figures8 tables43 notesNR-XTECH-SPACE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Orbit is shared infrastructure under growing load
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Severe storm in a crowded low orbit
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
    1. 6.1 The other desks’ editions of this subject
    2. 6.2 Three lenses
    3. 6.3 Standards, Academy and steward contributions
    4. 6.4 GCRI reading: the model card
    5. 6.5 Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays
    6. 6.6 Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 space readiness pack
    7. 6.7 Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch
    8. 6.8 Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Standards ProgressNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Academy CapabilityNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading orbit as shared physical infrastructure under growing load. Traffic is large, the hazards couple through storms, navigation and the ground segment, and the rules are still forming. Evidence is strongest for catalogue counts and one storm, and weakest for emissions, supply and recovery.

ORB-001 · SPW-005 · NAV-007 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people space arrives as a launch video, a navigation app or a headline about debris. The baseline asks that public debate separate counts, estimates and models, and keep the ground services that depend on orbit in view.

ORB-001 · NAV-007 · SPW-005

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. The GPS benefit estimate and the 2024 farm losses show where finance-readiness evidence will matter157. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

NAV-007 · SPW-005

NEXUS

Synthesis

Orbital infrastructure is well described by catalogue counts and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should reconcile catalogues, test the storm pathway and publish a comparable emissions inventory.

SYS-012 · Q-01 · Q-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for space. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI Canada)Lead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Nexus Standards and Academytechnology chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, NXS standards, RA capabilitytechnology editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Orbit is a shared resource that carries navigation, timing and communications. Treating it as infrastructure shows who depends on it and what a shared failure would cost.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

One orbit, many dependents

A national catalogue, an agency estimate and a public tracker answer different questions. This edition labels each and asks for a common basis before they are compared.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Counts are not equal

A storm is a natural event, and a crowded orbit makes its effects larger. One storm in 2024 and one preprint model show the pattern without proving the limit.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Storms and traffic compound

Disposal rules, licensing and safety standards are tightening, and the main EU proposal is still being negotiated. The gap between launch growth and rule adoption is the near-term question.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Rules lag the traffic

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 space readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 space readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Space risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • PUBLISHED
  • DRAFT
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Outer Space Treaty25United NationsglobalIN FORCEprinciples of state activity
Liability Convention13United NationsglobalIN FORCEliability for damage
Registration Convention26United NationsglobalIN FORCEregistration of objects
ITU Radio Regulations18ITUglobalIN FORCEfrequency assignments and interference
FCC five-year disposal rule11FCCUS licensees and market entrantsADOPTED 2022post-mission disposal
ESA Zero Debris approach1238ESAESA missions and partnersPUBLISHED 2023mitigation requirements
COPUOS sustainability guidelines33United NationsglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYlong-term sustainability
IADC mitigation guidelines34IADCagency membersPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYdebris mitigation
EU Space Act proposal1424European CommissionEUDRAFTsafety, resilience, sustainability
Artemis Accords16NASA and signatory states78 signatoriesPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYprinciples for exploration

Changed since 2024

  • The Council recorded scrutiny reservations from all Member States on the EU Space Act in November 202514
  • The Artemis Accords count stood at 78 after a signing on 28 October 202616
  • ESA published its 2026 Space Environment Report on 14 September 20262

To watch in 2027

  • EU Space Act compromise text and Parliament position1424
  • National disposal and licensing rules following the FCC order11
  • COPUOS and ITU work on space sustainability1833

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers space assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about space and orbital infrastructure and its couplings?
Sources searched
peer-reviewed journals and preprints; treaties, standards bodies and agencies; catalogue and agency reports; industry summaries
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and preprints
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Parker and Linares6preprint2024supportsstorm drag
Thiele and others9preprint2025supportscollision timing
Ferreira and others10journal article2024supportsreentry aluminum oxides
Maloney and others30journal article2025contextatmospheric modelling
Hayakawa and others39journal article2025contextMay 2024 storm
Ryan and others29journal article2022contextlaunch emissions
Kessler and Cour-Palais27journal article1978frameworkcollision frequency
Boley and Byers28journal article2021contextconstellation risks
Table 6.6Foundations and field overviews
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Tsurutani and others42journal article2003frameworkextreme storm of 1859
Royal Academy of Engineering35report2011frameworknavigation vulnerabilities
Secure World Foundation40report2025contextcounterspace capabilities
Space Foundation23industry report2025contexteconomy size, unverified
SIA 2026 report page22industry body2026contextindustry report, figures not read
Kuiper authorisation43regulator2020contextconstellation licensing
EU secure connectivity regulation41EU regulation2023contextpublic constellation
Table 6.7Treaties, standards and policy
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Liability Convention page13United Nations1972supportsliability
Outer Space Treaty25United Nations1967frameworkprinciples
Registration Convention26United Nations1975frameworkregistration
FCC Second Report and Order11FCC2022supportsfive-year rule
ESA Zero Debris approach12ESA2023supportsmitigation target
ESA mitigation requirements38ESA2023contextrequirements
NASA mitigation practices37NASA2019contextstandard practices
IADC guidelines34IADC2025contextguidelines
COPUOS guidelines33United Nations2019contextlong-term sustainability
UN resolution 77/4132United Nations2022contextanti-satellite tests
US statement on a 2021 test31US State Department2021contextdebris event
EU Council note14Council of the EU2025supportsnegotiation status
Commission proposal24European Commission2025supportsproposal date
ITU space services page18ITU2026supportsassignment recording
Artemis Accords page16NASA2026supportssignatory count
Table 6.8Official counts, industry and incident sources
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
NASA quarterly newsletter4NASA2026supportscatalogue box score
NASA debris FAQ5NASA2026supportstracked and small debris
ESA Space Environment Report 20251ESA2025supportsdebris estimates
ESA Space Environment Report 20262ESA2026supportslaunch counts
Public satellite statistics3independent tracker2026supportsactive satellites
NASA storm article7NASA2025supportsstorm effects
NOAA scales page8NOAA2026supportsG5 description
NIST GPS study page15NIST2019supportsGPS benefits
ISS page17NASA2025contextstation presence
EUSPA Galileo page21EUSPA2026contextnavigation system
CISA advisory19CISA2022supportssatellite network threats
UK attribution20UK Government2022supportsnetwork attack
EU Council declaration36Council of the EU2022contextattribution

Where the evidence agrees

  • Debris and traffic are growing and mitigation is tightening1211
  • Storms raise drag and can disturb navigation users78
  • Navigation and timing carry large economic value15

Where it is unsettled

  • How catalogue counts compare on a common basis145
  • How soon a collision cascade could start and how to measure it9
  • How large the atmospheric footprint of reentry is1030

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 15NIST (ed.), Economic Benefits of the Global Positioning System to the US Private Sector (news page dated 2 October 2019, updated 3 February 2025; study by RTI International sponsored by NIST; about USD 1.4 trillion in 2017 dollars, 1984 to 2017). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 7NASA (ed.), What NASA is learning from the biggest geomagnetic storm in 20 years (article dated 9 May 2025; page updated 25 September 2026). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations (ed.), Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1967, cited from memory. United Nations, New York. Observation year 1967. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 13United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (ed.), Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (treaty page; General Assembly resolution 2777 (XXVI) of 29 November 1971; opened for signature 29 March 1972). United Nations, Vienna. Observation year 1972. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations (ed.), Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, 1975, cited from memory. United Nations, New York. Observation year 1975. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 18ITU (ed.), ITU-R Space Services Department (web page; Radio Regulations procedures, Master International Frequency Register, space sustainability support). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 11FCC (ed.), Second Report and Order, FCC 22-74, Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age, IB Docket Nos. 22-271 and 18-313, adopted 29 September 2022, released 30 September 2022. Federal Communications Commission, Washington. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 12ESA (ed.), ESA Zero Debris approach (web page, undated; target 2030). European Space Agency, Paris. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: ESA Space Debris Office (ed.), ESA Space Debris Mitigation Requirements, Issue 1, 30 October 2023, taken from a file name on the Zero Debris page. European Space Agency, Darmstadt. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (ed.), Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities, 2019, cited from memory. United Nations, Vienna. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (ed.), IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines, cited from memory; the page returned an access error. IADC. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 14General Secretariat of the Council (ed.), Note 15830/25, Regulation on the safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union (EU Space Act), progress report for the Competitiveness Council of 8 and 9 December 2025, interinstitutional file 2025/0335 (COD), 26 November 2025. Council of the European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Proposal for a Regulation on the safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union (EU Space Act), COM(2025) 335, published 25 June 2025, taken from search-result summaries; the Council note gives 26 June 2025 as the transmission date. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: NASA (ed.), Artemis Accords (web page; 78 signatories; most recent signing on 28 October 2026). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 2ESA (ed.), ESA Space Environment Report 2026 (summary page dated 14 September 2026; data through the end of 2025; the full report PDF was not opened). European Space Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 6Parker, W.E. and Linares, R., Satellite Drag Analysis During the May 2024 Gannon Geomagnetic Storm, arXiv:2406.08617, 2024 (abstract page read; preprint). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 9Thiele, S., Heiland, S.R., Boley, A.C. and Lawler, S.M., An Orbital House of Cards: Frequent Satellite Close Conjunctions, arXiv:2512.09643, submitted 10 December 2025, version 3 of 29 June 2026 (abstract page read; preprint, peer review not located; the abstract of this version gives 5.5 days and 164 days). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 10Ferreira, J.P., Huang, Z., Nomura, K. and Wang, J., Potential Ozone Depletion From Satellite Demise During Atmospheric Reentry in the Era of Mega-Constellations, Geophysical Research Letters 51, 2024, DOI 10.1029/2024GL109280 (full text read; modelling study). American Geophysical Union, Washington. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.1029/2024GL109280back
  19. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: Maloney, C. and others, study of satellite reentry aluminum in the atmosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, April 2025, taken from a search-result summary that says its modelling did not include interactive ozone chemistry. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hayakawa, H. and others, The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in 2024 May: A Flash Data Report, The Astrophysical Journal, 2025, cited from memory. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ryan, R.G. and others, Impact of Rocket Launch and Space Debris Air Pollution on Stratospheric Ozone and Global Climate, Earth’s Future 10, e2021EF002612, 2022, cited from memory. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Kessler, D.J. and Cour-Palais, B.G., Collision frequency of artificial satellites: the creation of a debris belt, Journal of Geophysical Research 83, 2637 to 2646, 1978, cited from memory. Observation year 1978. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Boley, A.C. and Byers, M., Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth, Scientific Reports 11, 10642, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Tsurutani, B.T. and others, The extreme magnetic storm of 1 to 2 September 1859, Journal of Geophysical Research 108(A7), 1268, 2003, cited from memory. Observation year 2003. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Royal Academy of Engineering (ed.), Global Navigation Space Systems: reliance and vulnerabilities, March 2011, cited from memory; the page returned an error. Royal Academy of Engineering, London. Observation year 2011. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Secure World Foundation (ed.), Global Counterspace Capabilities: An Open Source Assessment, 2025 edition, cited from memory. Secure World Foundation, Broomfield. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 23UNVERIFIED, not opened: Space Foundation (ed.), The Space Report 2025 Q2 (global space economy USD 613 billion in 2024, about 7.8% growth, about 78% commercial), taken from search-result summaries; the page returned an access error. Space Foundation, Colorado Springs. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 22SIA (ed.), State of the Satellite Industry Report, 2026 edition covering fiscal year 2025 (web page read; the executive summary was not read and no figure is used). Satellite Industry Association, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: FCC (ed.), authorisation of the Kuiper satellite system, July 2020, cited from memory. Federal Communications Commission, Washington. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/588 establishing the Union Secure Connectivity Programme for the period 2023 to 2027, March 2023, cited from memory. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: NASA (ed.), NASA Procedural Requirements and Standard Practices for orbital debris mitigation, 2019 edition, named in the FCC order and cited from memory. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations General Assembly resolution 77/41 on destructive direct-ascent anti-satellite missile tests, December 2022, cited from memory; the document viewer returned no text. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of State (ed.), press statement on the Russian direct-ascent anti-satellite missile test of November 2021, 15 November 2021, cited from memory; the page returned an access error. US Department of State, Washington. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 4NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ed.), Orbital Debris Quarterly News, Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2026 (satellite box score as of 4 August 2026; launch table May to July 2026). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 5NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ed.), Orbital debris frequently asked questions (more than 34,000 objects catalogued as of August 2026; about 100 million millimeter-sized pieces; 41 ISS avoidance maneuvers since 1999). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 1ESA (ed.), ESA Space Environment Report 2025 (summary page dated 1 April 2025; data through the end of 2024). European Space Agency, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  37. 3McDowell, J., Active satellites statistics page (state at 2026 Oct 26; independent expert tracker, not an official catalogue; headline 17,099, category total 17,098). Jonathan McDowell, Cambridge MA. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  38. 8NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (ed.), NOAA Space Weather Scales explanation page (G5 extreme geomagnetic storm). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  39. 17NASA (ed.), International Space Station (web page; 25 years of continuous human presence marked on 2 November 2025). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  40. 21EUSPA (ed.), Galileo (web page last modified 25 September 2026; no satellite count on the page). European Union Agency for the Space Programme, Prague. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  41. 19CISA and FBI (eds.), Strengthening Cybersecurity of SATCOM Network Providers and Customers, Advisory AA22-076A, published 17 March 2022, revised 10 May 2022. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Arlington. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  42. 20UK Government (ed.), Russia behind cyber attack with Europe-wide impact an hour before Ukraine invasion (news story of 10 May 2022; company statements are quoted by the government and are weak evidence). Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  43. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Council of the European Union (ed.), Russian cyber operations against Ukraine: declaration by the High Representative on behalf of the EU, 10 May 2022, cited from memory; the page returned an access error. Council of the European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 6: Readings from the other desks. In Exponential Technology Report 2026: Space and Orbital Infrastructure (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-SPACE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Space and Orbital Infrastructure.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.