The institutional annual review is how The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) accounts each year for its governance, its delivery, its objectives and the lessons it has learned. It covers both organizations, GCRI Canada and GCRI US, and names which one acted where they acted alone. This page describes what each review contains and the rules it follows. No annual review has been released yet, so this page shows no figures, outcomes or rankings. When a review is approved and released, it is published here with its date and version history. Return to About GCRI.
GCRI · Institution · service level R0
The GCRI institutional annual review is the yearly account of its governance, delivery, objectives and lessons, covering GCRI Canada and GCRI US and naming which one acted where it acted alone. The page describes what each review contains and the rules it follows; no review has been released yet, and it is separate from the Nexus Reports flagship.
Fig.How the platform is governed, from its mandate to the authorities who decide. Design, not a record.
The jurisdictions that hold authority over this question: countries, their first-level divisions and capitals, shown for West Africa as an example geography for this subject.
Changes to boards, instruments, delegated decisions and accountable roles, consistent with Board and governance.
Work actually delivered in the year, each item linked to its record and labelled by evidence class. Planned work stays separate from delivered work.
Progress against the stated objectives of Strategy 2026–2030, including objectives missed or withdrawn, with reasons.
What did not work, what was corrected and what changes in the next cycle. Adverse findings are kept, not edited out.
Changes to mandate, legal structure, statuses, relationships or service levels, each with its date and record.
The annual review accounts for the institution. It is not the annual flagship of Nexus Reports, which reports on country systems and the programme's findings. The other pillar institutions publish their own reviews, for example the annual institutional review of The Global Risks Forum (GRF) and the review of The Global Risks Alliance (GRA).
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Annual review | A yearly public record of an institution's activities, governance changes, corrections and status, published with its dates and evidence. |
| Public accountability | The obligation of an institution to explain and justify its conduct to the public and to bodies that can question it, and to face consequences, as the OECD frames accountability in governance. |
| Lessons learned | Documented knowledge from experience, positive or negative, recorded to change future practice. |
No review has been released. The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. The first review is published once the year it covers has closed and the review has been approved; no release date is promised.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.