GCRI · 일의 미래와 역량
자동화와 일자리
Automation, robotics and AI take over some tasks, assist others and create new ones. Whether this displaces workers, raises productivity and wages or does both depends on the tasks involved, how firms deploy technology and how institutions support transitions. This page sets out how automation affects jobs, how exposure and impact are measured, and what evidence serves the policymakers, employers and unions responsible.
Automation and jobs on the record.
Automation and jobs: how the risk develops.
AI/robotics impact and job redesign. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Tasks, not whole jobs
Most occupations combine tasks that can be automated with tasks that cannot. Automation reshapes jobs more often than it eliminates them outright.
Displacement and reinstatement
Technology displaces labour from some tasks and creates new tasks that need people. Net effects depend on the balance between the two.
Productivity gains may not reach wages
If gains accrue mainly to capital owners, automation can raise output while wages stagnate for exposed workers.
Transitions are costly for individuals
Displaced workers often face long unemployment or lower pay in new jobs, especially older workers and those in declining regions.
How automation and jobs is modelled, measured and tested.
모형, 그 가정, 데이터, 불확실성을 과학자나 엔지니어가 확인할 형태로 제시합니다. 구조는 발행된 방법을 따릅니다. 제시된 값은 예시이며 결과가 아닙니다.
시스템 모형
The couplings between the systems in automation and jobs: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
Automation exposure differs by domain.
Findings are designed for the 기하급수적 기술 시리즈. The ILO’s 2023 working paper estimates exposure, which is not job loss.
- Firm adoption data.
- Worker surveys.
측정되는 것과 그 정확도.
각 지표에는 단위, 주기, 그 뒤의 출처 종류, 값에 붙을 근거 표시가 있습니다. 값은 표시하지 않습니다. 값은 프로그램이 자체 권한으로 제공합니다.
| 지표 | 단위 | 주기 | 출처 유형 | 라벨 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment in occupations with high automation exposure | percent of employment | 평가별 | Task-based exposure studies | 추정 |
| Firms using AI or robots | percent of firms | per survey | Business surveys | 보고됨 |
| Displaced worker re-employment rate | percent re-employed within a year | per survey | Displaced worker surveys | 보고됨 |
| Wage change after displacement | percent | per survey | Linked employer-employee data | 추정 |
| Labour share of income | GDP 대비 비율(%) | 연간 | 국민계정 | 추정 |
| New job titles emerging | 건수 | 연간 | Occupational classification updates and job postings | 관측 |
근거의 출처.
이름이 명시된 공개 데이터셋과 기관 기록으로, 각각 라이선스 등급이 있습니다. 협약에 따른 출처는 그 조건에 따라서만 사용하며 결코 재게시하지 않습니다.
| 출처 | 제공하는 것 | 라이선스 등급 |
|---|---|---|
| ILO global studies on generative AI exposure | Occupational exposure estimates by country and gender | Public, ILO terms |
| OECD studies on automation and AI in the labour market | Evidence on exposure and adoption | Public, OECD terms |
| US Bureau of Labor Statistics Displaced Worker Survey | Outcomes of displaced workers | Public domain, US government |
| O*NET occupational task database | Task content of occupations used in exposure studies | 공개, CC BY 4.0 |
| Eurostat enterprise AI and robot use statistics | Adoption by firms | Open, Eurostat reuse policy |
누가 결정하며 근거는 무엇에 쓰이는지.
Future of Work and Skills prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 결정 주체 | 질문 | 이 페이지가 제공하는 근거 |
|---|---|---|
| Labour ministries | Which workers and regions need transition support | Exposure profiles; displacement evidence |
| Employers and unions | How to introduce technology and share gains | Adoption and wage evidence |
| Training providers | Which skills to build for new tasks | Emerging task evidence |
이 주제가 생산하는 산출물
- Task-based exposure profiles by occupation and group
- Displacement and re-employment analyses
- Evaluation designs for transition programmes
- Evidence notes for social dialogue on technology
What researchers ask about automation.
- Which tasks can current AI and robots perform reliably and at acceptable cost?
- When does technology substitute for workers and when does it complement them?
- How are productivity gains shared between firms, workers and consumers?
- How can jobs be redesigned so people keep meaningful, skilled work?
Displacement, productivity and new work.
Automation has a displacement effect, as machines take over tasks, and a productivity effect, as lower costs raise demand and employment elsewhere. Historically, new tasks and occupations have also emerged, reinstating demand for labour. The balance between these forces determines the net effect on employment and wages.
Industrial robots mainly automate physical, repetitive tasks in manufacturing and logistics. Generative AI reaches cognitive tasks such as drafting, summarising and coding. Evidence from early workplace studies suggests AI assistance can raise productivity, sometimes most for less experienced workers, but effects vary widely by task and implementation. What employers choose to automate, and how, matters as much as technical capability.
Evidence on automation and its limits.
- 01
Task exposure measures
Matching technology capabilities to occupational task descriptions, informed by 인공지능과 머신러닝 and robotics and automation. Measures depend on judgements about capability that age quickly.
- 02
Robot adoption studies
Linking robot installations to local employment and wages with 계량경제학. Results differ between countries and periods.
- 03
Workplace experiments
Randomised or natural experiments in firms adopting AI, using 사회 및 행동 과학. Short-run effects may not reflect long-run change.
- 04
Job redesign case studies
How organisations reorganise work around new tools. Case studies illustrate possibilities rather than averages.
연구되는 방식과 방법이 말할 수 없는 것.
Where this page’s references lead.
이 페이지를 읽을 때 기준이 되는 기구와 문서. 상태와 판은 바뀌며, 각 링크는 발행 기구로 연결됩니다.
이 페이지가 컨소시엄 전체에서 어디로 이어지는지.
질문과 답변.
Will automation cause mass unemployment?
What is task-based analysis?
Who is most exposed to automation?
Is automation exposure the same as job loss?
Does AI help or hurt less experienced workers?
Can job redesign prevent displacement?
Does the platform advise firms on automation?
이 페이지에서 증거를 기여하십시오.
보고서 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 이메일게이트웨이 GW-GCRI이 페이지에서 보내기증거, 정정, 사례, 방법, 검토, 번역 또는 프로필 입력 자료. 이 페이지의 태그가 붙어 도착하므로, 이를 담당하는 편집자가 받게 됩니다.
- Zenodo개방형 예치기탁하고 커뮤니티에 제출하기ORCID iD로 Zenodo에 직접 기록을 게시한 뒤, 그곳의 Reports 커뮤니티에 제출하십시오. 큐레이터가 검토하며, DOI는 귀하의 것으로 남습니다.
- 보고서GCRI모든 기여 방법 보기기여 유형, 각각의 검토 방식, 받게 되는 크레디트, 라이선스, 그리고 절대 받지 않는 것.
개인정보, 민감한 인프라 세부 정보, 공유할 권리가 없는 자료는 절대 보내지 마십시오. 기여물은 사용 전에 검토됩니다. 기여물을 보낸다고 해서 저작자 지위나 편집 권한이 부여되지 않으며, 후원으로 조사 결과를 얻을 수 없습니다.
방법, 데이터세트 또는 질문을 가져오십시오.
정보와 문의는 오늘부터 열려 있습니다. 문의에는 참조 번호가 부여되고 다음 단계가 안내됩니다. 신청, 결제, 컴퓨팅 할당, 등록은 해당 팀, 약관, 심사 역량이 갖추어졌을 때만 열립니다.
법률 문서.
이 사이트의 지도, 데이터와 그림은 맥락과 일반 정보로 제시됩니다. 조언, 예보 또는 경보가 아니며, 정보의 한계는 면책 고지와 데이터 고지에 나와 있습니다.