GCRI · 工作与技能的未来
自动化与就业
Automation, robotics and AI take over some tasks, assist others and create new ones. Whether this displaces workers, raises productivity and wages or does both depends on the tasks involved, how firms deploy technology and how institutions support transitions. This page sets out how automation affects jobs, how exposure and impact are measured, and what evidence serves the policymakers, employers and unions responsible.
Automation and jobs: how the risk develops.
AI/robotics impact and job redesign. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Tasks, not whole jobs
Most occupations combine tasks that can be automated with tasks that cannot. Automation reshapes jobs more often than it eliminates them outright.
Displacement and reinstatement
Technology displaces labour from some tasks and creates new tasks that need people. Net effects depend on the balance between the two.
Productivity gains may not reach wages
If gains accrue mainly to capital owners, automation can raise output while wages stagnate for exposed workers.
Transitions are costly for individuals
Displaced workers often face long unemployment or lower pay in new jobs, especially older workers and those in declining regions.
How automation and jobs is modelled, measured and tested.
模型、其假设、数据和不确定性，以科学家或工程师会核查的形式呈现。结构遵循已发表的方法。所取数值仅为示意，不是研究发现。
系统模型
The couplings between the systems in automation and jobs: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
Automation exposure differs by domain.
Findings are designed for the 指数级技术系列. The ILO’s 2023 working paper estimates exposure, which is not job loss.
- Firm adoption data.
- Worker surveys.
衡量什么，以及衡量得如何。
每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值：数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。
| 指标 | 单位 | 节奏 | 来源类型 | 标签 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment in occupations with high automation exposure | percent of employment | 每次评估 | Task-based exposure studies | 估算 |
| Firms using AI or robots | percent of firms | per survey | Business surveys | 已报告 |
| Displaced worker re-employment rate | percent re-employed within a year | per survey | Displaced worker surveys | 已报告 |
| Wage change after displacement | percent | per survey | Linked employer-employee data | 估算 |
| Labour share of income | 占 GDP 的百分比 | 年度 | 国民账户 | 估算 |
| New job titles emerging | 计数 | 年度 | Occupational classification updates and job postings | 观测 |
证据来自何处。
具名公共数据集与机构记录，各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用，绝不再次发布。
| 来源 | 它提供什么 | 许可类别 |
|---|---|---|
| ILO global studies on generative AI exposure | Occupational exposure estimates by country and gender | Public, ILO terms |
| OECD studies on automation and AI in the labour market | Evidence on exposure and adoption | Public, OECD terms |
| US Bureau of Labor Statistics Displaced Worker Survey | Outcomes of displaced workers | Public domain, US government |
| O*NET occupational task database | Task content of occupations used in exposure studies | 开放，CC BY 4.0 |
| Eurostat enterprise AI and robot use statistics | Adoption by firms | Open, Eurostat reuse policy |
由谁决定，以及证据服务于什么。
Future of Work and Skills prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 谁来决定 | 问题 | 本页面服务的证据 |
|---|---|---|
| Labour ministries | Which workers and regions need transition support | Exposure profiles; displacement evidence |
| Employers and unions | How to introduce technology and share gains | Adoption and wage evidence |
| Training providers | Which skills to build for new tasks | Emerging task evidence |
该主题产生的产出
- Task-based exposure profiles by occupation and group
- Displacement and re-employment analyses
- Evaluation designs for transition programmes
- Evidence notes for social dialogue on technology
What researchers ask about automation.
- Which tasks can current AI and robots perform reliably and at acceptable cost?
- When does technology substitute for workers and when does it complement them?
- How are productivity gains shared between firms, workers and consumers?
- How can jobs be redesigned so people keep meaningful, skilled work?
Displacement, productivity and new work.
Automation has a displacement effect, as machines take over tasks, and a productivity effect, as lower costs raise demand and employment elsewhere. Historically, new tasks and occupations have also emerged, reinstating demand for labour. The balance between these forces determines the net effect on employment and wages.
Industrial robots mainly automate physical, repetitive tasks in manufacturing and logistics. Generative AI reaches cognitive tasks such as drafting, summarising and coding. Evidence from early workplace studies suggests AI assistance can raise productivity, sometimes most for less experienced workers, but effects vary widely by task and implementation. What employers choose to automate, and how, matters as much as technical capability.
Evidence on automation and its limits.
- 01
Task exposure measures
Matching technology capabilities to occupational task descriptions, informed by 人工智能与机器学习 and robotics and automation. Measures depend on judgements about capability that age quickly.
- 02
Robot adoption studies
Linking robot installations to local employment and wages with 计量经济学. Results differ between countries and periods.
- 03
Workplace experiments
Randomised or natural experiments in firms adopting AI, using 社会与行为科学. Short-run effects may not reflect long-run change.
- 04
Job redesign case studies
How organisations reorganise work around new tools. Case studies illustrate possibilities rather than averages.
Where this page’s references lead.
阅读本页时所对照的机构和文件。状态和版本会变化；每个链接都指向发布机构。
问题与解答。
Will automation cause mass unemployment?
What is task-based analysis?
Who is most exposed to automation?
Is automation exposure the same as job loss?
Does AI help or hurt less experienced workers?
Can job redesign prevent displacement?
Does the platform advise firms on automation?
从本页贡献证据。
报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 电子邮件网关 GW-GCRI从本页发送证据、更正、案例、方法、审查、翻译或概况投稿。它会带上本页标签送达，由负责的编辑接收。
- Zenodo开放存缴存缴并提交到社区用您的 ORCID iD 在 Zenodo 上发布您自己的记录，然后提交到那里的 Reports 社区。由策展人审核；DOI 仍归您所有。
- 报告GCRI查看所有贡献方式贡献类型、各自的评审方式、您获得的署名、许可协议，以及绝不接受的内容。
切勿发送个人数据、敏感基础设施细节或您无权分享的任何内容。贡献在使用前会经过审查；发送贡献不赋予署名权或编辑权，赞助也绝不能换取研究结论。
法律文件。
本网站上的地图、数据和图表仅作为背景和一般信息展示。它们不是建议、预测或预警；信息的局限见免责声明和数据说明。