GCRI · 사회와 인간 개발
미디어와 정보 시스템
In a crisis, what people know depends on news media, social platforms, messaging apps, authority channels and word of mouth. These 시스템 can save lives by spreading accurate warnings and guidance, or spread rumours and false information that cost them. This page sets out how information systems work in crises and over time, how information quality and access are measured, and what evidence serves the authorities, media and civil society involved.
Media and information systems in seven parts.
Media and information systems: how the risk develops.
Media and public information as social 시스템. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Local news is shrinking
Loss of local journalism leaves communities with fewer trusted sources and less scrutiny of local institutions.
Messaging apps carry crisis information
Private messaging groups spread information quickly, including rumours, and are hard for authorities to monitor or correct.
Platforms amplify what engages
Recommendation systems favour content that draws attention, which can amplify fear, outrage and false claims in a crisis.
Trusted messengers matter
People act on information from sources they trust, such as community leaders, health workers and local media, more than on distant authorities.
Social protection and cohesion.
팀이 이 주제를 따라가는 데 사용할 화면으로, 그 지표, 상태, 결정을 보여 줍니다. 이름은 예시이며 값은 설명용입니다.
Social protection and cohesion
Media and information systems · Urban ward 9 · Year 2
Coverage by quintile
Cohesion survey
| Trust in neighbours | 63 | 51 | ▲ 2 |
| Trust in local authority | 48 | 52 | ▲ 1 |
| Reported discrimination | 9 | 11 | ▲ 2 |
Information systems carry risk messages for every domain.
Findings are designed for the 증거 브리프 시리즈. The UN Global Principles for 정보 무결성 (2024) frame the field.
- Media monitoring studies.
- Evaluations of information interventions.
How media and information systems is modelled, measured and tested.
모형, 그 가정, 데이터, 불확실성을 과학자나 엔지니어가 확인할 형태로 제시합니다. 구조는 발행된 방법을 따릅니다. 제시된 값은 예시이며 결과가 아닙니다.
시스템 모형
The couplings between the systems in media and information systems: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
측정되는 것과 그 정확도.
각 지표에는 단위, 주기, 그 뒤의 출처 종류, 값에 붙을 근거 표시가 있습니다. 값은 표시하지 않습니다. 값은 프로그램이 자체 권한으로 제공합니다.
| 지표 | 단위 | 주기 | 출처 유형 | 라벨 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust in news | percent trusting most news most of the time | 연간 | News consumption surveys | 보고됨 |
| Main source of news by type | 응답자 비율(%) | 연간 | News consumption surveys | 보고됨 |
| Journalists killed or imprisoned | 건수 | 연간 | Press freedom monitors | 보고됨 |
| Local news outlets | count per region | 평가별 | Media mapping studies | 추정 |
| Rumours tracked in crisis response | count by theme | 사건별 | Community feedback 시스템 | 보고됨 |
| Population reached by authority crisis messages | percent | 사건별 | Post-event surveys | 보고됨 |
근거의 출처.
이름이 명시된 공개 데이터셋과 기관 기록으로, 각각 라이선스 등급이 있습니다. 협약에 따른 출처는 그 조건에 따라서만 사용하며 결코 재게시하지 않습니다.
| 출처 | 제공하는 것 | 라이선스 등급 |
|---|---|---|
| Reuters Institute Digital News Report | News use and trust across countries | Public report, terms per publisher |
| UNESCO Observatory of Killed Journalists and World Trends in Freedom of Expression | Safety of journalists and media freedom | Public, UNESCO terms |
| Committee to Protect Journalists data | Journalists killed and imprisoned | Public, terms to check |
| WHO infodemic management resources | Methods for managing information in health emergencies | Public, WHO terms of use |
| IFRC and partner community feedback and rumour tracking guidance | Methods for listening to communities in crises | Public, IFRC terms (to check) |
누가 결정하며 근거는 무엇에 쓰이는지.
Society and Human Development prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 결정 주체 | 질문 | 이 페이지가 제공하는 근거 |
|---|---|---|
| Public health and emergency authorities | How to reach people with accurate information in crises | Ecosystem assessments; trust profiles |
| Media organisations and regulators | How to support local journalism and information quality | Media mapping and freedom evidence |
| Humanitarian agencies | How to listen to and respond to community concerns | Rumour tracking evidence |
이 주제가 생산하는 산출물
- Information ecosystem assessments for crisis communication
- Rumour tracking and community feedback methods
- Media access and trust profiles
- Evidence notes for risk communication
전문가가 묻는 질문.
- How is the information ecosystem structured, and who controls its key channels?
- What happens to public knowledge when local news declines?
- How do information flows behave during crises, and where do they break?
- Which communities are poorly served by mainstream channels?
- How do economic models of media affect the quality of risk information?
The ecosystem and its fragilities.
Information ecosystems combine professional media, platforms, messaging apps, community channels and authority sources. The decline of local journalism in many places has reduced coverage of local government, hazards and public health. Platforms have become major gatekeepers, and their ranking and moderation choices shape exposure to information. Encrypted messaging networks carry both community support and rumour, and are hard to observe.
During crises, demand for information surges while normal channels may fail through power and network outages. Rumours fill gaps when authority information is slow or distrusted. Language, literacy, disability and connectivity determine who receives timely information. Concentration of ownership and dependence on advertising revenue influence what is covered and how.
Resilient information 시스템 share some features: diverse sources, trusted local intermediaries, channels that work without the internet such as radio, information in the languages people speak, and authority communicators who are open about uncertainty and correct themselves quickly. These features can be studied, compared and strengthened.
Public service and community media often play an outsized role in crises because they reach people without internet access and are locally trusted. Their funding and independence are therefore part of a society’s risk infrastructure, a point the field documents with comparative evidence across countries.
Methods and limits.
Ecosystem mapping
Mapping outlets, audiences and flows of information in a place.
Content analysis
Systematic analysis of coverage and narratives; large-scale methods need careful validation.
Audience research
Surveys and qualitative work on how people find and judge information.
Limits: platform data access is restricted, private messaging is largely unobservable, and rapidly changing technology dates findings quickly.
Where this page’s references lead.
이 페이지를 읽을 때 기준이 되는 기구와 문서. 상태와 판은 바뀌며, 각 링크는 발행 기구로 연결됩니다.
질문과 답변.
What is an infodemic?
Why does local journalism matter in a crisis?
What is rumour tracking?
Does the platform rate media outlets?
How is this different from the chapter?
Is GCRI a media regulator?
이 페이지에서 증거를 기여하십시오.
보고서 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 이메일게이트웨이 GW-GCRI이 페이지에서 보내기증거, 정정, 사례, 방법, 검토, 번역 또는 프로필 입력 자료. 이 페이지의 태그가 붙어 도착하므로, 이를 담당하는 편집자가 받게 됩니다.
- Zenodo개방형 예치기탁하고 커뮤니티에 제출하기ORCID iD로 Zenodo에 직접 기록을 게시한 뒤, 그곳의 Reports 커뮤니티에 제출하십시오. 큐레이터가 검토하며, DOI는 귀하의 것으로 남습니다.
- 보고서GCRI모든 기여 방법 보기기여 유형, 각각의 검토 방식, 받게 되는 크레디트, 라이선스, 그리고 절대 받지 않는 것.
개인정보, 민감한 인프라 세부 정보, 공유할 권리가 없는 자료는 절대 보내지 마십시오. 기여물은 사용 전에 검토됩니다. 기여물을 보낸다고 해서 저작자 지위나 편집 권한이 부여되지 않으며, 후원으로 조사 결과를 얻을 수 없습니다.
방법, 데이터세트 또는 질문을 가져오십시오.
정보와 문의는 오늘부터 열려 있습니다. 문의에는 참조 번호가 부여되고 다음 단계가 안내됩니다. 신청, 결제, 컴퓨팅 할당, 등록은 해당 팀, 약관, 심사 역량이 갖추어졌을 때만 열립니다.
법률 문서.
이 사이트의 지도, 데이터와 그림은 맥락과 일반 정보로 제시됩니다. 조언, 예보 또는 경보가 아니며, 정보의 한계는 면책 고지와 데이터 고지에 나와 있습니다.