GCRI · Agency

Technical assistance scope

Technical assistance supplies knowledge, skills and analysis to an institution that holds a public mandate. It does not transfer that mandate. Scope sets the problem, the deliverables, the counterpart, the acceptance criteria and the decisions reserved to the client. Scope that is vague at the start is where delivery risk first enters a programme. This page sets out how scope is defined, how scope risk develops and spreads, and what evidence the holders of the mandate use to decide.

01Register

Technical assistance scope on the record.

02The question

Technical assistance scope: how the risk develops.

What support can and cannot authorise. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Advice drifts into authority

Advisers placed to fill a capacity gap are gradually asked to draft, then approve, then sign. The institution’s own staff stop exercising the function, and the line between advice and decision disappears from the record.

Mechanism

Terms of reference leave gaps

Objectives without acceptance criteria, deliverables without a named counterpart, and timelines without decision points mean no one can say whether the work is done. Variations, extensions and payment disputes follow.

Mechanism

Supply shapes the demand

When assistance is designed around what a funder or firm can supply rather than what the institution asked for, ownership is weak and outputs sit unused. Parallel units built to deliver the assistance can drain the system it was meant to strengthen.

Mechanism

Unscoped work cascades

A draft regulation enacted without legal review, or a design signed by an adviser without authority, moves risk from the assignment into the institution. Audit observations, safeguard breaches and suspended financing can follow, each with its own holder and remedy.

03Geography

People and hazards in East Africa.

Population density, night lights and flood water over East Africa, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

People and hazards, for this page

About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University))
Provider
NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University)
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Vintage
null; Census-based estimate, static (2020)
Resolution
about 1 km grid
Uncertainty
Census-based estimate of people per square kilometre in 2020, shown as exposure context; not a count of people affected by any hazard.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2) (NASA LAADS DAAC)
Provider
NASA LAADS DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite radiance, corrected for moonlight and atmosphere
Newest at build
2026-10-12
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite night-time radiance for the date shown; lights are a proxy for electricity use and outages, not a measurement of supply or access.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
VIIRS Global Flood Product (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite image
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite image. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Modelled (latest year GIBS publishes)
Source
MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1) (NASA LP DAAC)
Provider
NASA LP DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
yearly; Satellite classification; latest year GIBS publishes
Newest at build
2024-01-01
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite land cover classes for the year shown, including croplands; a classification with known errors, not a farm register.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
MODIS Terra EVI (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite index; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-13
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite vegetation index for the 8 days to the date shown, a habitat condition indicator; not a measure of species or biodiversity.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

People and hazards, framed on East Africa.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERTSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS Black Marble night-time lights, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; distributed by the NASA Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
  • Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • Optional layers (5 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Night-time lights, daily: VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2), NASA LAADS DAAC · 12 Oct 2026
  • Flood water, 3-day composite: VIIRS Global Flood Product, NASA LANCE · 14 Oct 2026
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024
  • Enhanced vegetation index, rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra EVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026

05Monitor

Assignment and team board.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Assignment and team board

Technical assistance scope · Assignment pool · Quarter 4

One team awaiting independence reviewGCRI · Agency

Assignments

Request02
Flood recovery planning supportCountry team A
Data system reviewInstitution B
Scoping01
Heat-health plan review4 experts proposed
Independence check01
Water utility auditDeclaration pending
In field01
Early warning assessmentWeek 8 of 10
Close-out01
Agriculture data auditReview signed

Team record

Team leadDisaster risk managementNone declaredConfirmed
HydrologistFlood modellingDeclared, managedConfirmed
Data engineerPipelinesNone declaredInvited
ReviewerIndependentNone declaredConfirmed

Scope

Requester
Requesting institution
Duration
5 weeks
Authority
stays with the requester
Fee
no fee stated
Assignment and team board: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Technical assistance scope.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
06Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Technical cooperation in bilateral development assistance (ODA)percent of gross disbursementsannualOECD Creditor Reporting System type-of-aid codesPublished statistics
Assignments mobilised with signed terms of referencepercent of assignmentsquarterlyEngagement and contract recordsREPORTED
Deliverables accepted against stated acceptance criteriapercent of deliverablesper assignmentClient acceptance recordsREPORTED
Terms-of-reference amendmentscount per assignmentper assignmentContract variation recordsPublished statistics
Assignments with a named counterpart in the client institutionpercent of assignmentsquarterlyEngagement recordsDECLARED
Advisory positions performing line functionscount of positionsannualFunctional reviews, audit findingsREPORTED
Development co-operation using country public financial management and procurement systemspercent of disbursementsper monitoring roundGlobal Partnership monitoringPublished statistics
07Twin and cascade simulator

Model technical assistance scope as a system. Run the cascade.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Disaster risk reduction: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

  • Tropical cyclone
  • Flash flood
  • Heatwave
  • Ice-jam flood
  • HIV epidemic
  • Earthquake
  • Storm surge (set off downstream)
  • Intense rainfall (set off downstream)
  • River flood (set off downstream)
  • Dangerous surf (set off downstream)
  • Widespread power outage (set off downstream)
  • Mass displacement (set off downstream)
  • Coastal flood (set off downstream)
  • Extreme fire weather (set off downstream)
  • Wildfire (set off downstream)
  • Heat-driven grid stress (set off downstream)
  • Agricultural drought (set off downstream)
  • Flash drought (set off downstream)

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-1 The UNI and the artefact catalogue (grammar v0.2: domain, sector, region and environment segments)
  • NS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)
  • NS-3b Dataset and product metadata profile (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O)
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NS-14 Conformance and crosswalk to external standards
  • NRS-C15 Loss, damage and impact accounting
  • NRS-H114 Hazard family: Macroeconomic and fiscal shocks (NHS-1 soc.macro-fiscal)
  • NRS-K20 Domain pack profile: Climate adaptation (DOMAIN-020)
  • NRS-H54 Hazard family: Signal and platform disruption (NHS-1 cyber.platform)
  • NRS-H65 Hazard family: Planetary boundary transgressions (NHS-1 planet.boundary)
  • NRS-H119 Hazard family: Cultural heritage loss (NHS-1 soc.heritage)

Observation

  • DesInventar disaster loss databases (listed for reference)
  • INFORM Risk Index (listed for reference)
  • Global SDG Indicators Database (listed for reference)
  • EM-DAT international disaster database (listed for reference)
  • Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population
  • Number of directly affected people attributed to disasters per 100,000 population
  • Direct economic loss attributed to disasters in relation to global GDP
  • Damage to critical infrastructure attributed to disasters
  • Number of countries that adopt and implement national DRR strategies
  • Total public international support for national disaster risk reduction actions (Sendai indicator F-1)
  • Number of countries that have multi-hazard early warning systems
  • Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population

Example geography

  • Bangladesh: 134 hexagonal cells
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Surface air temperature, daytime (AIRS), NASA GIBS
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
08Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
OECD Creditor Reporting SystemActivity-level aid records, including type-of-aid categories for donor experts and other technical assistanceFree and open, attribution under OECD terms
IATI Datastore and d-portalPublished activity data: objectives, participating organisations, budgets, documents and resultsOpen, licence declared per publisher
Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation monitoringCountry-led data on ownership, use of country systems and results frameworksOpen, attribution
World Bank Independent Evaluation Group evaluationsEvaluations of advisory services, analytics and technical assistance operationsPublic documents under the World Bank access to information policy
UN Joint Inspection Unit reportsSystem-wide reviews of consultants and non-staff personnel in UN organisationsPublic documents
National supreme audit institution reportsAudits of externally funded programmes, advisory contracts and decision authorityPublic records, terms per audit office
09Methods and evidence

How technical assistance scope is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

Datasets and provenance

The data classes behind technical assistance scope and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Data classProvenance recordedResolution statedLicence checked
Satellite imagery, optical and radarsensor, processing level, acquisition datepixel size and revisitper scene
Reanalysis and climate model outputmodel, experiment, member, versiongrid and time stepper release
In-situ sensors and gaugesstation, instrument, calibration recordpoint and sampling rateper network
Population and asset exposuremethod, vintage, input sourcescell size and unitper release
Boundaries and reference geographyproducer, edition, datescaleper edition
Lineage
W3C PROV record from source to figure
Principles
FAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable
Gaps
shown as missing, never filled silently
Data classes and the provenance fields recorded for each; a dataset is listed by name only once its licence admits the use.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
10Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Agency prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
Requesting ministry or public agencyWhether the need is for advice, implementation support or a function the institution must staff itselfMandate map; scope statement with the decisions reserved to the institution
Funding agency task team or programme managerWhether the terms of reference are specific enough to finance and to accept deliverables againstTerms-of-reference checklist, acceptance criteria and counterpart commitment
Supreme audit institution or internal audit functionWhether decisions were taken by persons holding the legal authority to take themRecords of who advised, who decided and who signed
Public service commission or establishment officeWhether externally funded advisers are substituting for posts the institution should fillFunctional review findings; advisory positions against the establishment

Outputs this topic produces

  • Scope statements that separate advice, implementation support and decisions reserved to the client
  • Terms-of-reference checklists with acceptance criteria, counterpart and decision points
  • Mandate maps showing which office holds which decision right
  • Scope-risk notes for requesting institutions and funders
11Core questions

What a good scope answers.

  • Which institution holds the mandate for this work, and who in it is accountable for using the results?
  • What question does the assistance answer, and what deliverables will show it has been answered?
  • What is explicitly outside the scope?
  • What capability should remain with the host when the assistance ends?
12Why boundaries matter

How assistance goes wrong.

The best-documented failure of technical assistance is substitution: advisers do the work instead of building the host’s capacity, and the host is no better able to act when they leave. A second failure is authority creep, where an adviser’s recommendation is treated as a decision, or where assistance becomes a channel for steering procurement or financing towards particular suppliers.

Clear scope protects all parties. The host keeps control of its decisions, the expert knows the limits of their responsibility, and affected communities can see who answers for what. For that reason assistance offered through the Consortium’s programme carries a stated limit for each type of work, such as ‘a blueprint is not an installed environment’ or ‘testing is not certification or procurement status’.

14Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

  1. Systems engineeringTracing terms of reference to deliverables · Managing interfaces in multidisciplinary teamsApplied here
  2. Decision analysis under uncertaintyMulti-criteria assessment of expert fit · Value of information before deploymentApplied here
15Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

16Questions

Questions and answers.

What is the difference between technical assistance and a decision?
Technical assistance produces analysis, options, drafts and training. A decision is an act of an office that holds the legal authority for it. The assistance can inform the decision; it cannot take it or sign for it.
Why do acceptance criteria matter so much?
Without them, neither the client nor the expert can show that a deliverable meets the need. Acceptance becomes a negotiation, and payment, extension and quality disputes follow.
Can an adviser fill a vacant post?
Only where the engagement says so explicitly and the institution’s rules allow it. Otherwise the adviser should support the post holder, not replace them, so that accountability stays with the institution.
Does Agency decide what support is provided?
No. Requesting institutions and funders decide what is provided and under which mandate. Agency pages set out how scope is defined and what evidence those decisions can draw on.
Can assistance include drafting legislation or regulations?
Assistance can provide evidence, comparisons and options to the competent authority. Drafting and adopting legal instruments remains the authority’s own work and decision.
What happens if the host asks for work outside the scope?
The request is treated as a scope change. It is assessed and agreed in writing, or declined, rather than absorbed informally.
Who owns the outputs?
Ownership and licensing of outputs are stated in the written terms of each engagement. The default intent is that the host can use and maintain what was produced for it.
Is technical assistance free?
Cost and who bears it are set out in the terms of each engagement. Recording an enquiry carries no fee.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIAgencyPortfolio and Readiness
Agency

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.