GCRI · Agency

Institutional support

Institutional support aims to strengthen an organisation’s ability to perform its mandate: its systems, people, rules and the environment it operates in. It is scoped to eligible organisations, those with a lawful mandate, clean sanctions status and the governance to absorb help. This page sets out how capacity is assessed, how support can weaken the institution it serves, how capacity erodes after support ends, and what the evidence serves for those who decide.

02The question

Institutional support: how the risk develops.

Scoped support to eligible organisations. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Capacity is systemic

Capacity sits at three levels: individuals, the organisation and the enabling environment of laws, budgets and incentives. Training individuals without changing systems or incentives rarely changes performance.

Mechanism

Parallel structures substitute

Project units with salary supplements draw skilled staff out of the line ministry. Work gets done, but in a structure that closes when funding ends, leaving the ministry weaker than before.

Mechanism

Reform meets interests

Changes to procurement, payroll or revenue systems shift power and rents. Resistance can stall or hollow out a reform while formal milestones are still met, so compliance on paper and change in practice diverge.

Mechanism

Capacity erodes after exit

When support ends, unfunded recurrent costs, staff turnover and unmaintained systems erode gains. Weak financial management then shows up in audit qualifications and service failures, and in the next diagnostic.

03Geography

People and hazards in East Africa.

Population density, night lights and flood water over East Africa, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

People and hazards, for this page

About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University))
Provider
NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University)
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Vintage
null; Census-based estimate, static (2020)
Resolution
about 1 km grid
Uncertainty
Census-based estimate of people per square kilometre in 2020, shown as exposure context; not a count of people affected by any hazard.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2) (NASA LAADS DAAC)
Provider
NASA LAADS DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite radiance, corrected for moonlight and atmosphere
Newest at build
2026-10-12
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite night-time radiance for the date shown; lights are a proxy for electricity use and outages, not a measurement of supply or access.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
VIIRS Global Flood Product (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite image
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite image. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Modelled (latest year GIBS publishes)
Source
MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1) (NASA LP DAAC)
Provider
NASA LP DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
yearly; Satellite classification; latest year GIBS publishes
Newest at build
2024-01-01
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite land cover classes for the year shown, including croplands; a classification with known errors, not a farm register.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
MODIS Terra EVI (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite index; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-13
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite vegetation index for the 8 days to the date shown, a habitat condition indicator; not a measure of species or biodiversity.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

People and hazards, framed on East Africa.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERTSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS Black Marble night-time lights, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; distributed by the NASA Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
  • Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • Optional layers (5 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Night-time lights, daily: VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2), NASA LAADS DAAC · 12 Oct 2026
  • Flood water, 3-day composite: VIIRS Global Flood Product, NASA LANCE · 14 Oct 2026
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024
  • Enhanced vegetation index, rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra EVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026

04In the five domains

Institutional support strengthens each domain’s agencies.

05Monitor

Assignment and team board.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Assignment and team board

Institutional support · Assignment pool · Quarter 1

One team awaiting independence reviewGCRI · Agency

Assignments

Request02
Flood recovery planning supportCountry team A
Data system reviewInstitution B
Scoping01
Heat-health plan review5 experts proposed
Independence check01
Water utility auditDeclaration pending
In field01
Early warning assessmentWeek 2 of 10
Close-out01
Agriculture data auditReview signed

Team record

Team leadDisaster risk managementNone declaredConfirmed
HydrologistFlood modellingDeclared, managedConfirmed
Data engineerPipelinesNone declaredInvited
ReviewerIndependentNone declaredConfirmed

Scope

Requester
Requesting institution
Duration
6 weeks
Authority
stays with the requester
Fee
no fee stated
Assignment and team board: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Institutional support.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
06Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Public expenditure and financial accountability indicator scoresordinal score, A to Dper assessmentPEFA assessmentsPublished statistics
Public sector management and institutions cluster ratingrating on a six-point scaleannualWorld Bank CPIAESTIMATED
Government effectiveness estimatestandard normal units with standard errorannualWorldwide Governance IndicatorsESTIMATED
Procurement system assessment results by pillarassessment findings and gapsper assessmentMAPS assessmentsPublished statistics
Vacancy rate in established posts of the supported unitpercent of postsannualEstablishment and payroll recordsPublished statistics
Positions funded by external programmescount of positionsannualPayroll and programme recordsREPORTED
Recurrent costs of supported functions covered by the national budgetpercent of recurrent costannualBudget documentsPublished statistics
Staff turnover in counterpart unitspercent of staff per yearannualHuman resource recordsREPORTED
07Twin and cascade simulator

Model institutional support as a system. Run the cascade.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Disaster risk reduction: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

  • Tropical cyclone
  • Flash flood
  • Heatwave
  • Ice-jam flood
  • HIV epidemic
  • Earthquake
  • Storm surge (set off downstream)
  • Intense rainfall (set off downstream)
  • River flood (set off downstream)
  • Dangerous surf (set off downstream)
  • Widespread power outage (set off downstream)
  • Mass displacement (set off downstream)
  • Coastal flood (set off downstream)
  • Extreme fire weather (set off downstream)
  • Wildfire (set off downstream)
  • Heat-driven grid stress (set off downstream)
  • Agricultural drought (set off downstream)
  • Flash drought (set off downstream)

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-1 The UNI and the artefact catalogue (grammar v0.2: domain, sector, region and environment segments)
  • NS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)
  • NS-3b Dataset and product metadata profile (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O)
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NS-14 Conformance and crosswalk to external standards
  • NRS-C15 Loss, damage and impact accounting
  • NRS-H114 Hazard family: Macroeconomic and fiscal shocks (NHS-1 soc.macro-fiscal)
  • NRS-K20 Domain pack profile: Climate adaptation (DOMAIN-020)
  • NRS-H54 Hazard family: Signal and platform disruption (NHS-1 cyber.platform)
  • NRS-H65 Hazard family: Planetary boundary transgressions (NHS-1 planet.boundary)
  • NRS-H119 Hazard family: Cultural heritage loss (NHS-1 soc.heritage)

Observation

  • DesInventar disaster loss databases (listed for reference)
  • INFORM Risk Index (listed for reference)
  • Global SDG Indicators Database (listed for reference)
  • EM-DAT international disaster database (listed for reference)
  • Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population
  • Number of directly affected people attributed to disasters per 100,000 population
  • Direct economic loss attributed to disasters in relation to global GDP
  • Damage to critical infrastructure attributed to disasters
  • Number of countries that adopt and implement national DRR strategies
  • Total public international support for national disaster risk reduction actions (Sendai indicator F-1)
  • Number of countries that have multi-hazard early warning systems
  • Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population

Example geography

  • Bangladesh: 134 hexagonal cells
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Surface air temperature, daytime (AIRS), NASA GIBS
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
08Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
PEFA assessments (PEFA Secretariat)Assessments of public financial management performance against a common frameworkPublic reports where the government consents to publication
Worldwide Governance Indicators (World Bank)Composite estimates of government effectiveness, regulatory quality and control of corruptionOpen, CC BY 4.0
Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (World Bank)Ratings of policy and institutional frameworks, including public sector managementOpen, CC BY 4.0
MAPS assessments (MAPS Secretariat, OECD)Assessments of public procurement systems by pillar and indicatorPublic reports where the government consents to publication
SIGMA monitoring reports (OECD and European Union)Assessments against the Principles of Public AdministrationPublic reports, OECD terms
National civil service and budget recordsEstablishment, payroll, vacancy and recurrent cost dataPublic records, terms per government
09Methods and evidence

How institutional support is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

Datasets and provenance

The data classes behind institutional support and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Data classProvenance recordedResolution statedLicence checked
Satellite imagery, optical and radarsensor, processing level, acquisition datepixel size and revisitper scene
Reanalysis and climate model outputmodel, experiment, member, versiongrid and time stepper release
In-situ sensors and gaugesstation, instrument, calibration recordpoint and sampling rateper network
Population and asset exposuremethod, vintage, input sourcescell size and unitper release
Boundaries and reference geographyproducer, edition, datescaleper edition
Lineage
W3C PROV record from source to figure
Principles
FAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable
Gaps
shown as missing, never filled silently
Data classes and the provenance fields recorded for each; a dataset is listed by name only once its licence admits the use.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
10Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Agency prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
Ministry of finance or public service commissionWhether the institution can fund and staff the supported functions after the programmeRecurrent cost coverage, vacancy rates and positions funded externally
Governing board or head of the beneficiary institutionWhich reforms to own and sequence, and which support to declineCapacity map at three levels; diagnostic findings by indicator
Funding agencyWhether an organisation is eligible for support and what conditions applyEligibility checklist; diagnostic and safeguard evidence
Parliamentary public accounts committeeWhether supported institutions are improving in practice, not only on paperRepeat diagnostic results with methods kept comparable

Outputs this topic produces

  • Capacity maps across individual, organisational and enabling-environment levels
  • Eligibility checklists covering mandate, governance and sanctions status
  • Sustainability notes on recurrent costs, staffing and system ownership
  • Exit plans that set what the institution must fund and run after support ends
11Core questions

What frames institutional support.

  • Is the organisation eligible, and does it hold a mandate for the work?
  • What capability does it need, and what does it already have?
  • How will the organisation sustain the capability after support ends?
  • How is the work governed, and who on the host side owns it?
12Mechanisms

Capacity that lasts.

Capability rests on people, processes, tools and authority working together. Support that delivers a tool without the staff to run it, or trains staff who then have no mandate or budget to apply their skills, rarely lasts. Staff turnover, procurement constraints and changes in leadership can unwind progress quickly.

Lasting support therefore begins with a baseline of current capability, agrees a small number of priority gaps, pairs outside experts with named host counterparts and leaves documented processes and maintainable tools behind.

13Good practice

Signals that capability will last.

  • Named host counterparts for every outside specialist, with time allocated to the work.
  • Processes documented in the host’s own systems and language.
  • Tools the host can operate, maintain and procure support for without the original team.
  • Leadership sponsorship that survives a change of personnel.
14Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

  1. Systems engineeringTracing terms of reference to deliverables · Managing interfaces in multidisciplinary teamsApplied here
  2. Decision analysis under uncertaintyMulti-criteria assessment of expert fit · Value of information before deploymentApplied here
15Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

16Questions

Questions and answers.

What makes an organisation eligible for institutional support?
Each funder sets its own rules, usually covering legal mandate, governance, financial management, sanctions status and safeguard capacity. Eligibility is decided by the funder, not by the organisation asking for help.
Why can project implementation units weaken ministries?
They often pay more and recruit the ministry’s best staff. Work moves to a structure that ends with the project, and the ministry loses the people it needs to sustain the function.
Can governance indicators show whether support worked?
Rarely on their own. They are broad composites with wide error. Function-specific diagnostics repeated with the same method say more about a supported institution.
Who is eligible for institutional support?
Organisations with a mandate for the work, subject to the programme’s sanctions and eligibility policy and to safeguarding rules. Eligibility is confirmed when applications open.
Can a private company receive support?
Support is designed for organisations with a public-interest mandate. Any participation by a private operator is scoped so that it confers no commercial advantage.
Does support continue indefinitely?
No. Each engagement has a term and a closeout. The aim is that the host can continue without outside help.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIAgencyPortfolio and Readiness
Agency

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.