GCRI · Campaigns

Campaign completion

Campaigns end, but their material, their data and the relationships they created remain. Campaign completion covers what happens at the end: telling participants what came of their input, archiving or deleting records on schedule, retiring public material that would otherwise go stale, handing over roles and services, and reflecting honestly on what was learned. This page sets out how poor endings erode trust and leave risks behind, how completion is recorded, and who decides what is kept.

02The question

Campaign completion: how the risk develops.

Records, reflection and exit pathways. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Closing the loop keeps trust

People who gave time, stories or data expect to know what happened. When outcomes are never reported back, participation fatigue sets in and the next invitation is refused. The IAP2 spectrum treats a stated promise to the public as part of every level of participation.

Mechanism

Stale material becomes misinformation

Advice pages, hotlines and social posts left online after a campaign ends keep circulating. Out-of-date preparedness guidance, superseded health advice and dead contact numbers can mislead long after the sponsor has moved on.

Mechanism

Dependencies are left behind

Volunteers, partner organisations and communities may rely on roles, groups or services the campaign created. Ending them without notice or handover leaves people exposed and shifts the burden to local organisations that may lack the resources.

Mechanism

Learning leaks away

Staff move, files scatter and unflattering findings go unpublished. Without an after-action review and a deposited record, the next campaign repeats the same errors and the evidence base keeps only the successes.

03Geography

Connected activity in South Asia.

Night lights, population density and land cover over South Asia, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

Connected activity, for this page

About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2) (NASA LAADS DAAC)
Provider
NASA LAADS DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite radiance, corrected for moonlight and atmosphere
Newest at build
2026-10-12
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite night-time radiance for the date shown; lights are a proxy for electricity use and outages, not a measurement of supply or access.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University))
Provider
NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University)
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Vintage
null; Census-based estimate, static (2020)
Resolution
about 1 km grid
Uncertainty
Census-based estimate of people per square kilometre in 2020, shown as exposure context; not a count of people affected by any hazard.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite image
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite image. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Modelled (latest year GIBS publishes)
Source
MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1) (NASA LP DAAC)
Provider
NASA LP DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
yearly; Satellite classification; latest year GIBS publishes
Newest at build
2024-01-01
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite land cover classes for the year shown, including croplands; a classification with known errors, not a farm register.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
MODIS Terra EVI (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite index; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-13
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite vegetation index for the 8 days to the date shown, a habitat condition indicator; not a measure of species or biodiversity.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
MODIS Terra NDVI (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite index; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-13
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite greenness index over the 8 days to the date shown; an indicator of crop and pasture condition, not a yield estimate or a food security warning.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

Connected activity, framed on South Asia.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · NASA/NOAA VIIRS · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERTSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS Black Marble night-time lights, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; distributed by the NASA Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
  • Observed (EO): NASA/NOAA VIIRS (Suomi NPP). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • Optional layers (5 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Night-time lights, daily: VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2), NASA LAADS DAAC · 12 Oct 2026
  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024
  • Enhanced vegetation index, rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra EVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Vegetation greenness (NDVI), rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra NDVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026

04In the five domains

Completion records close each campaign with what it did and did not achieve.

05Monitor

Campaign wave tracker.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Campaign wave tracker

Campaign completion · Wave 4 · Campaign area North

  • People reached
    313129Active
  • Consent complete, % of participants
    96Normal
  • Knowledge score change
    0.4pointsNormal
  • Open feedback items
    12Watch
Wave in fieldGCRI · Campaigns

Preparedness actions by area

050100share of households after the wave, surveyNSSchoolsTownsCoast

Messages under test

Prepare a water reserveA33Revise
Know your warning levelsB26Revise
Check on neighboursA62Keep

Safeguarding and consent

  1. S-1Minor enrolled without guardian recordPause and verify1 d
  2. S-2Withdrawal requestData deleted, logged2 d
Campaign wave tracker: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Campaign completion.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
06Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Participants informed of outcomesparticipants sent a closing summary, of participantsper campaignCommunication logDECLARED
Public pages reviewed at closepages retired, archived or marked, of pages publishedper campaignContent inventoryOBSERVED
Data closed on scheduledatasets deleted or archived on time, of datasets heldper campaignRetention logDECLARED
After-action review completedcompleted or not, with dateper campaignReview recordDECLARED
Roles and services handed overitems with a named successor, of items open at closeper campaignHandover registerREPORTED
Final report depositeddeposited or not, with repository and identifierper campaignRepository recordOBSERVED
Participant reflection responsesresponses received, by groupper campaignClosing survey or session notesREPORTED
07Twin and cascade simulator

Model campaign completion as a system. Run the cascade.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Information integrity and trust: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

  • Civil unrest
  • Ice-jam flood
  • Tropical cyclone
  • Heatwave
  • HIV epidemic
  • Dam failure
  • Storm surge (set off downstream)
  • Intense rainfall (set off downstream)
  • River flood (set off downstream)
  • Flash flood (set off downstream)
  • Dangerous surf (set off downstream)
  • Widespread power outage (set off downstream)
  • Mass displacement (set off downstream)
  • Coastal flood (set off downstream)
  • Extreme fire weather (set off downstream)
  • Wildfire (set off downstream)
  • Heat-driven grid stress (set off downstream)
  • Agricultural drought (set off downstream)

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-2 Citation and attribution format for UNIs
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NS-12 Software, model and AI/ML artefacts (supply chain, model cards, dataset sheets)
  • NRS-H52 Hazard family: Information-integrity attacks (NHS-1 cyber.integrity)
  • NRS-X7 Information integrity and public trust
  • NRS-U23 Universe platform profile: Reports
  • NRS-A4 Zero-trust verification of standards and conformance
  • NRS-H65 Hazard family: Planetary boundary transgressions (NHS-1 planet.boundary)
  • NRS-H72 Hazard family: Novel entities and emerging contaminants (NHS-1 poll.novel-entities)

Observation

  • GDELT event database and global knowledge graph (listed for reference)
  • Our World in Data datasets (listed for reference)
  • Number of countries that adopt and implement guarantees for public access to information

Example geography

  • The Horn of Africa: 253 hexagonal cells
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
  • Surface air temperature, daytime (AIRS), NASA GIBS
08Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
OSF and Zenodo repositoriesPersistent deposits of reports, instruments and data with identifiersOpen; licence per deposit
UK Data ServiceArchiving and tiered access for social survey and qualitative dataAccess by licence tier
Internet Archive Wayback MachineArchived copies of public web pages for the recordFree to access; terms of use
IATI RegistryPublished results and closure data for funded activitiesOpen licence per publisher
National archives records retention schedulesRules for keeping and disposing of public recordsPublic records; reuse per national archive
OECD DAC Evaluation Resource CentreFinal evaluations of development programmesFree to read
09Methods and evidence

How campaign completion is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

System model

The couplings between the systems in campaign completion: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−+InformationSocietyCommunitiesEconomyR reinforcingB balancing
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
10Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Campaigns prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
Campaign sponsors and lead organisationsWhen to end a campaign and what remains public afterwardsContent inventory; handover register; after-action review
Records managers and national archivesWhich records to keep, for how long, and which to destroyRetention schedules; data maps; consent terms
Data protection officersWhether personal data are deleted or anonymised as promisedRetention log; withdrawal records; consent terms
Community partnersWhether to take on roles or groups the campaign createdHandover register; resources and support on offer

Outputs this topic produces

  • Campaign outcome records deposited with persistent identifiers
  • Closing summaries for participants in plain language
  • Retirement notices on public material, pointing to the authority that holds current information
  • Exit and handover pathways for volunteers and partners
11Core questions

What experts ask.

  1. 01

    What is the record?

    What was delivered, what changed, what it cost in effort and what did not work, written while memory is fresh.

  2. 02

    What happens to data?

    Which data is deleted, which is kept in aggregate and for how long, as the consent protocol promised.

  3. 03

    Who continues the work?

    Whether a local institution takes over, materials are handed on or the activity simply stops.

  4. 04

    What did participants learn?

    How people involved are told the results and asked what they would change.

12Mechanisms

What drives the outcome.

Campaigns often end abruptly when funding stops. Communities that gave time and trust may hear nothing further, which damages willingness to take part next time. Research on community engagement treats feedback of results as an ethical duty, not a courtesy.

Materials outlive campaigns. Explainers keep circulating after their evidence is out of date, and a campaign page left online without a status can mislead. A completion record marks material as archived and points to current sources.

Exit can also be a success. A campaign that hands its work to a local institution with the capacity to sustain it has done more than one that continues indefinitely without purpose.

13Methods and limits

How evidence is gathered, and where it stops.

MethodWhat it showsIts limit
Completion reportActivities, outcomes and lessonsWritten by those with a stake in success
Participant feedbackHow the campaign was experiencedResponse rates fall after closure
Data disposal logWhat was deleted or retainedDepends on accurate records throughout
Archive reviewWhich materials remain publicRequires periodic checking
14Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

  1. Decision analysis under uncertaintyCommunicating before the evidence settles · Choosing channels and audiencesApplied here
  2. Social and behavioural scienceAudience research before a campaign · Pre-testing material for comprehensionApplied here
15Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

16Questions

Questions and answers.

Why plan the end at the start?
Because consent terms, retention periods, handover and the closing report all depend on commitments made at launch. Promises that cannot be kept at the end should not be made at the beginning.
What should happen to old campaign pages?
They should be retired, archived with a clear notice or updated, and point to the authority that now holds current information. Leaving them live without notice risks spreading outdated advice.
What is an after-action review?
A structured discussion at the close of a campaign about what was intended, what happened, why, and what to change. Its record is kept and deposited, including findings that reflect badly on the campaign.
Can volunteers keep their roles after a campaign ends?
Only if a partner takes them on with resources and a named contact. Otherwise the exit pathway should say clearly what ends, when, and where volunteers can continue.
Do closed campaigns stay online?
Their record stays, marked as closed, with pointers to current sources. Out-of-date material is archived rather than left to circulate as current.
Can a campaign be reopened?
A new phase is treated as a new campaign, with its own aims, measures and review.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRICampaignsEvidence Brief
Campaigns

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.