Public-interest communication, participation and campaign-specific knowledge mobilization. Nexus Campaigns is an established platform published by The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation.
Risk communication is the real-time exchange of information, advice and opinions between experts or officials and people facing a threat, so they can take informed decisions, in WHO usage. Nexus Campaigns studies how public understanding, participation and trust form and spread, and how public-interest campaigns keep claims honest, participation voluntary and outcomes on record.
Educators; civic groups; researchers; community partners; programme teams.
Audience research; consented participation; public communication evaluation.
Campaign explainers; responsible participation guides; campaign outcome records.
The working screen behind this platform: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
Wave 2 · Campaign area North
| Prepare a water reserve | A | 41 | Revise |
| Know your warning levels | B | 58 | Revise |
| Check on neighbours | A | 36 | Keep |
For nexus campaigns, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on population density, true-colour imagery and night lights with true colour from NASA GIBS, framed on South Asia; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
People and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For nexus campaigns, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on population density, true-colour imagery and night lights with true colour from NASA GIBS, framed on South Asia; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Teaching complex risks with clear evidence.
TopicCampaigns rooted in life-support systems.
TopicPreparedness information and community safeguards.
TopicPractical understanding of AI risks.
TopicSponsor neutrality and public claims.
TopicVoluntary roles and privacy.
TopicLearning metrics and demonstrable outcomes.
TopicRecords, reflection and exit pathways.
Decades of research on risk perception show that people do not weigh hazards the way models do. Familiar, voluntary and visible risks feel smaller than unfamiliar, imposed and invisible ones. Trust in the messenger shapes belief in the message, and trust is lost faster than it is earned. Numbers alone rarely move behaviour; people act when they understand what a risk means for them, what they can do and that the action is within reach.
Failures cascade. A water advisory that reaches only those who read one language leaves others exposed. A preparedness campaign that overstates certainty erodes trust for the next one. A well-meant message that names an institution without permission creates a false impression of authority, and a campaign that collects personal data it does not need creates a privacy risk of its own. In a crisis, unclear messages compete with rumour and with deliberate disinformation, and the people with the least time, money or connection are the most exposed to the gap.
Campaigns therefore need the same discipline as any other intervention: a stated purpose, evidence that holds, a defined audience, a way to measure effect and an honest record of what did not work.
A question becomes evidence, a governed build, an organized community, a controlled test, a reviewed publication and, finally, a decision taken by the competent authority under its own rules.
Fig.The Nexus cycle on this platform, from question to renewal. Design, not a record of a run.
Nexus Campaigns serves educators, civic groups, researchers, community partners and programme teams who want to explain a risk, invite participation or mobilize knowledge for public benefit.
Plain-language material on a risk, with each claim sourced and its uncertainty stated.
Voluntary, accessible and consented routes for people to contribute, with a way to withdraw.
Measured results against aims agreed before launch, including results that fall short.
Campaigns explain and prepare. They never issue warnings: warnings come only from the authorities mandated to give them, and campaign material points people to those authorities.
The platform rests on two canonical methods in the STEM Commons: social and behavioural science, which supplies audience research, survey design and evaluation, and decision analysis under uncertainty, which helps a campaign say what a person can reasonably do when the evidence is incomplete. Their application here is described on social and behavioural science in Nexus Campaigns and decision analysis under uncertainty in Nexus Campaigns.
The same field is governed at The Global Risks Forum (GRF) through Information Integrity, which convenes institutions on misinformation, crisis information and public trust. The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) connects through Institutional Funds Nexus, where long-horizon investors examine how public understanding of risk shapes stewardship. The method behind every campaign is set out in how campaigns work, and lessons can feed the Evidence Brief series of Nexus Reports.
Nexus Campaigns studies how public understanding, participation and trust in information form, degrade and spread, and how public-interest campaigns can keep their claims honest, their participation voluntary and their outcomes on record. Its pages cover risk literacy, life-support awareness, preparedness, AI literacy, governance, consent, evidence and completion, setting out the science, data, methods and decisions for each, with every measure labelled by its evidence.
How people read probabilities, forecasts and evidence about uncertain harm, and which presentation formats reduce misreading.
Trust in sources, the spread of false and misleading content, and how corrections and information voids shape understanding.
Public understanding of water and food systems, the advisories issued about them, and rumour during shortages.
How preparedness information and warnings travel, where the chain breaks, and safeguards for people who are hard to reach.
Practical understanding of AI systems, synthetic media, provenance and rights over automated decisions.
Voluntary roles, informed and revocable consent, privacy and safeguarding in public engagement.
Sponsor disclosure, editorial independence, evidence behind public claims and correction when claims are wrong.
Measuring reach, understanding and outcomes honestly, and closing campaigns with records, reflection and exit pathways.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Risk communication | The real-time exchange of information, advice and opinions between experts or officials and people facing a threat to their health, economic or social well-being. |
| Risk literacy | The ability to find, understand and weigh information about uncertain harms, such as probabilities, relative risks and hazard maps. |
| Information integrity | An information ecosystem in which accurate, reliable information is available and people can exercise freedom of expression, as the UN Global Principles describe it. |
| Informed consent | Agreement to take part given freely by a person who understands what participation involves and can withdraw without penalty. |
Every claim on Nexus Campaigns rests on methods with a canonical page in the STEM Commons, so readers can see what a finding depends on and where its limits lie.
The platform does not set standards. It reads its evidence against the frameworks that competent bodies have adopted, so a finding can be placed where a decision-maker already works.
| Framework or standard | Body | What it sets |
|---|---|---|
| Communicating risk in public health emergencies | World Health Organization | Recommendations on trust, community engagement, listening, message development and managing rumours in emergencies |
| Media and information literacy curriculum and competency framework | UNESCO | Competencies for accessing, evaluating, creating and sharing information responsibly |
| Spectrum of Public Participation | International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) | Levels of participation from inform to empower, each with a stated promise to the public |
| Recommendation of the Council on Open Government | OECD | Principles for transparency, integrity, accountability and stakeholder participation in public decisions |
| Global Principles for Information Integrity | United Nations | Principles on societal trust, healthy incentives, public empowerment, independent media, transparency and research access |
| Aarhus Convention | UNECE | Rights of access to environmental information, public participation in decisions and access to justice |
| General Data Protection Regulation | European Union | Lawful bases, conditions for consent, rights of withdrawal, access and erasure, and protection of children's data |
| Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) | Testable criteria for perceivable, operable, understandable and robust web content |
| Evaluation criteria | OECD Development Assistance Committee | Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability as the basis for evaluation |
| Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence | UNESCO | Values and policy actions for AI, including public awareness and AI literacy |
GCRI studies a field as science, GRF governs it and GRA builds shared financial understanding of it. Nexus Campaigns links to its counterparts so that work on one side is visible on the others.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.