Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Systems and sectors at baseline

6 min read0 figures2 tables12 notesNR-STRATEGIC-INVESTMENT-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Money meets risk
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
    1. 3.1 Where each system stood at evidence close
    2. 3.2 Domain posture
    3. 3.3 Sector screens
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5A loss year that meets tight public budgets
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

ENE · Energy

Global energy investment, 2026 estimate

3.4USD trillion

electricity supply and infrastructure 1.6 trillion.

Estimated2026IEA1

INF · Assets

US ten-year infrastructure gap

3.6USD trillion

overall grade C.

Reported2025ASCE2

CLI · Losses

Overall natural disaster losses

224USD billion

about USD 108 billion insured.

Reported2025Munich Re3

FIN · Risk transfer

Catastrophe bonds outstanding

61.3USD billion

record issuance of 25.6 billion in 2025.

Reported2025Artemis tracker5

DEV · Adaptation

Adaptation finance tracked

65USD billion

likely an underestimate.

Reported2023CPI6

SYS · Cross-system

IMF resilience commitments

10.3SDR billion

27 arrangements to end-February 2026.

Reported2026IMF9

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through resilience investment, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries resilience investment risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATWater works compete with power for capital; no consolidated series here.ENE → WATExpert input EQL 2
ENEEnergy investment is estimated at USD 3.4 trillion in 2026; electricity supply and infrastructure at USD 1.6 trillion.ENE → allReported EQL 4
FOOFood systems depend on energy and finance; adaptation finance for them is not consolidated here.ENE → FOOExpert input EQL 2
HLTHospital upkeep sits in national budgets; not consolidated here.ENE, WAT → HLTInferred EQL 2
BIONatural infrastructure can buffer hazards; investment evidence not consolidated here.BIO → WATExpert input EQL 2
CLIOverall disaster losses of about USD 224 billion in 2025; weather made up 92%.CLI → INFReported EQL 4
INFUS grade C and a USD 3.6 trillion ten-year gap.INF → FINReported EQL 3
FINThe core system: cat bonds at USD 61.3 billion and IMF resilience commitments of SDR 10.3 billion.the core systemReported EQL 4
DATPublic and private investment data are not on a common basis.DAT ↔ FINInferred EQL 2
AICApprovals for new gas-fired plants rose to a 25-year high in 2025, in a year of strong power demand growth1.AIC → ENEReported EQL 3
MINGrid and storage build-out depends on refined minerals; the evidence sits in the sibling edition on critical minerals.MIN → INFExpert input EQL 2
TRDInvestment flows follow trade in equipment; chokepoint data sit in the sibling edition on supply chains.INF ↔ TRDInferred EQL 2

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on resilience investment, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systeminvestment, losses and cover form one loop13loss year with tight budgetsPARTIAL
GS-01Waterwater works compete for capitaldeferred upkeepTHIN
GS-02EnergyUSD 3.4 trillion estimated in 20261security-driven shifts in spendingGOOD
GS-03Food and agrifoodadaptation finance for food systemsloss in a heat yearTHIN
GS-04Healthhospital upkeep in national budgetsdeferred upkeepTHIN
GS-05Finance and economyUSD 61.3 billion of cat bonds outstanding5cover withdrawal after lossesGOOD
GS-06Developmentadaptation finance of USD 65 billion in 20236debt-heavy financePARTIAL
GS-07Climatelosses of about USD 224 billion in 20253floods, storms, wildfireGOOD
GS-08Disasterrecovery fund pledges of USD 790.24 million8slow paymentPARTIAL
GS-09InfrastructureUS grade C and USD 3.6 trillion gap2ageing assetsGOOD
GS-10Citiesdense exposure and local budgetsmulti-hazard lossTHIN
GS-11Biodiversitynatural buffers for assetsloss of buffersTHIN
GS-12Earth observationhazard data underpin pricing and planningdata gapsTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitalinvestment data systemspoor comparabilityTHIN
GS-14Policybudget rules and climate finance goals715implementation gapsPARTIAL
GS-15Scienceadaptation economics is mature223839data at portfolio scalePARTIAL

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), World Energy Investment 2026, launch presentation (11 pages, Paris, 28 May 2026; global energy investment USD 3.4 trillion in 2026 estimate against USD 2.6 trillion in 2015; electricity supply and infrastructure USD 1.6 trillion). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (overall grade C; ten-year investment gap USD 3.6 trillion; energy D+, drinking water C−, dams D+). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3Munich Re (ed.), Natural disaster figures for 2025 (media information, 2026; overall losses about USD 224 billion; insured losses about USD 108 billion; weather events 92% of overall losses; Los Angeles wildfires about USD 53 billion overall). Munich Re, Munich. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 5Artemis (ed.), Catastrophe bond market records that were broken in 2025 (issuance about USD 25.6 billion; outstanding market just over USD 61.3 billion; 122 new 144A and private deals). Artemis, Bermuda. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 6Climate Policy Initiative (ed.), Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2025 (publication page, 23 June 2025; global climate finance USD 1.9 trillion in 2023; adaptation finance USD 65 billion, likely an underestimate; international flows to emerging and developing economies USD 196 billion, 78% public). Climate Policy Initiative, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 9IMF (ed.), 2026 Update of Resource Adequacy of the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust, Resilience and Sustainability Trust, and Debt Relief Trusts, policy paper, 6 March 2026 (27 RSF arrangements; commitments SDR 10.3 billion, about USD 14 billion; five new RSFs in 2025 for SDR 3.4 billion). International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 8UNFCCC (ed.), Report of the Board of the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage, addendum FCCC/CP/2025/10/Add.1, 10 November 2025 (pledges USD 790.24 million and amount received USD 397.74 million at 23 September 2025; 27 contributors). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 7UNFCCC (ed.), New collective quantified goal on climate finance, decision text FCCC/PA/CMA/2024/L.22, 24 November 2024 (at least USD 300 billion a year by 2035; call for USD 1.3 trillion a year from all sources; adaptation finance needs USD 215 to 387 billion a year to 2030). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 15Noerr (ed.), Bundestag approves exemption from the debt brake for defence spending and special funds for investments in infrastructure and climate protection (law-firm note; Bundestag vote 18 March 2025, Bundesrat 21 March 2025; EUR 100 billion for the Climate and Transformation Fund and EUR 100 billion for the states; twelve-year term). Noerr, Berlin. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 22World Resources Institute (ed.), 4 things to know about the global adaptation challenge (commentary of 10 September 2019 on the Global Commission on Adaptation; USD 1.8 trillion invested 2020 to 2030 could yield USD 7.1 trillion net benefits; benefit-cost ratios about 2 to 1 to 10 to 1). World Resources Institute, Washington. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Walsh, B., Building Back Better: Achieving Resilience through Stronger, Faster, and More Inclusive Post-Disaster Reconstruction. World Bank, Washington, 2018, cited from memory. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Rozenberg, J. and Fay, M., Beyond the Gap: How Countries Can Afford the Infrastructure They Need while Protecting the Planet. World Bank, Washington, 2019, cited from memory. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 3: Systems and sectors at baseline. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Resilience Investment and National Portfolios (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-INVESTMENT-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Resilience Investment and National Portfolios.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.