Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Money meets risk

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

6 min read2 figures1 table10 notesNR-STRATEGIC-INVESTMENT-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Money meets risk
    1. 1.1 The questions this part answers
    2. 1.2 The argument
    3. 1.3 Twenty couplings between five systems
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5A loss year that meets tight public budgets
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is resilience investment risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry resilience investment shocks into other systems?
  • Which resilience investment capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five mechanism chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Resilience investment is usually reported in pieces: energy budgets, infrastructure plans, insurance markets, adaptation funds. The 2025 and 2026 evidence reads them as one system. Energy investment builds the grids, the grids carry the loads, and losses decide how much of each budget goes to repair13.

The signals repeat. Energy investment is estimated at USD 3.4 trillion in 20261. The US report card shows a USD 3.6 trillion ten-year gap2. Overall disaster losses were about USD 224 billion in 20253. Tracked adaptation finance was USD 65 billion in 2023 against costed needs of USD 215 to 387 billion a year67.

National portfolios differ in kind. Japan sets a five-year plan of more than 20 trillion yen16. Australia holds a AUD 1 billion fund to 202819. Germany sets EUR 100 billion for a climate fund and EUR 100 billion for the states15. The units, periods and scopes differ, so the figures are read side by side and never added.

The edition therefore asks the same four questions of every portfolio: what was the common cause of the need, how does money move between systems, what is shared, and what threshold is crossed. It rates no government and recommends no fund.

Figure 1.1How large are the published investment and gap markers? USD billion

Investment, gap and loss figures are large and drawn from different sources. The four bars use different periods and methods, so they show scale only and are not added1236.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
US infrastructure gap, ten years3600
Global energy investment, 2026 estimate, one year3400
Global climate finance, 2023, one year1900
Overall disaster losses, 2025, one year224

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2025.

Figure ID FIG-STRATEGIC-INVESTMENT-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

3.4USD trillion

energy investment, 2026e1

3.6USD trillion

US ten-year gap2

1.9USD trillion

climate finance, 20236

224USD billion

overall disaster losses, 20253

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The resilience investment-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their resilience investment content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·MODERATE
cooling · hydropower capex		MODERATE
irrigation · processing		STRONG
safe supply · hospitals		WEAK
flows
ENE EnergySTRONG
pumping · treatment capex		·STRONG
cold chain · processing		STRONG
hospitals · cooling · telecoms		WEAK
land use
FOO FoodWEAK
withdrawals		WEAK
bioenergy		·MODERATE
nutrition · food safety		WEAK
land conversion
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce		WEAK
workforce		WEAK
labour		·WEAK
residues
BIO BiodiversitySTRONG
natural infrastructure		WEAK
hydrology		WEAK
pollination		WEAK
zoonoses		·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    FIN → ENE → INF

    Investment in grids and storage sets how well power, water and hospitals ride out a shock.

    Reported IEA 20261

  2. 02

    CLI → INF → FIN

    Hazards damage assets and the cost lands on budgets and insurers.

    Reported Munich Re 20253

  3. 03

    FIN → DEV

    Climate finance goals set how much adaptation money reaches developing countries.

    Reported UN decision 20247

  4. 04

    CLI → DEV → FIN

    Recovery funds depend on pledges turning into payments.

    Reported loss and damage fund 20258

  5. 05

    FIN → FIN

    Risk transfer shifts loss from budgets to markets.

    Reported cat bonds 20255

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), World Energy Investment 2026, launch presentation (11 pages, Paris, 28 May 2026; global energy investment USD 3.4 trillion in 2026 estimate against USD 2.6 trillion in 2015; electricity supply and infrastructure USD 1.6 trillion). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 3Munich Re (ed.), Natural disaster figures for 2025 (media information, 2026; overall losses about USD 224 billion; insured losses about USD 108 billion; weather events 92% of overall losses; Los Angeles wildfires about USD 53 billion overall). Munich Re, Munich. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 2ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (overall grade C; ten-year investment gap USD 3.6 trillion; energy D+, drinking water C−, dams D+). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6Climate Policy Initiative (ed.), Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2025 (publication page, 23 June 2025; global climate finance USD 1.9 trillion in 2023; adaptation finance USD 65 billion, likely an underestimate; international flows to emerging and developing economies USD 196 billion, 78% public). Climate Policy Initiative, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 7UNFCCC (ed.), New collective quantified goal on climate finance, decision text FCCC/PA/CMA/2024/L.22, 24 November 2024 (at least USD 300 billion a year by 2035; call for USD 1.3 trillion a year from all sources; adaptation finance needs USD 215 to 387 billion a year to 2030). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 16Tribune India (ed.), Japan approves 20 trillion yen plan for disaster resilient infrastructure (press agency report of 7 June 2025; more than 20 trillion yen over fiscal 2026 to 2030). Tribune India, Chandigarh. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 19NSW Government (ed.), Disaster Ready Fund (page on the Commonwealth programme; AUD 1 billion nationally over five years from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2028). New South Wales Government, Sydney. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 15Noerr (ed.), Bundestag approves exemption from the debt brake for defence spending and special funds for investments in infrastructure and climate protection (law-firm note; Bundestag vote 18 March 2025, Bundesrat 21 March 2025; EUR 100 billion for the Climate and Transformation Fund and EUR 100 billion for the states; twelve-year term). Noerr, Berlin. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 8UNFCCC (ed.), Report of the Board of the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage, addendum FCCC/CP/2025/10/Add.1, 10 November 2025 (pledges USD 790.24 million and amount received USD 397.74 million at 23 September 2025; 27 contributors). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 5Artemis (ed.), Catastrophe bond market records that were broken in 2025 (issuance about USD 25.6 billion; outstanding market just over USD 61.3 billion; 122 new 144A and private deals). Artemis, Bermuda. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 1: Money meets risk. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Resilience Investment and National Portfolios (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-INVESTMENT-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Resilience Investment and National Portfolios.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Corrections policy

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.

Privacy choices