GCRI · Science and methods
Geospatial science
Almost every risk question has a where: where hazards strike, where people and assets are, where services reach, where dependencies run. Geospatial science joins Earth observation, geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial statistics to answer it. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) states the limits too: coordinate systems, scale, data gaps and boundaries that change a result. Part of science and methods.
Geospatial science in seven parts.
- 01MethodsThe geospatial toolkit
- 02Units and reference systemsThe reference systems and units that make spatial risk results comparable
- 03Spatial validationWhy spatial models need spatial cross-validation
- 04GCRI’s partInteroperable spatial evidence, with national geography kept national
- 05LimitationsWhere geospatial results can mislead
- 06PracticeHow GCRI keeps spatial work checkable
- 07RelatedConnected pages
The geospatial toolkit.
Geospatial work combines observation, mapping and statistics. Each method has its own assumptions, and results are reported with the choices made.
Mapping and overlay
Combining hazard, exposure and service layers with geospatial information systems.
Spatial patterns
Clustering, interpolation and spatial dependence with spatial statistics and geostatistics.
Networks and reach
Travel time to hospitals, shelters and markets over real road and transport networks.
Earth observation worldwide.
Land cover and vegetation across the world, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
Earth observation, for this page
About this layer
- Evidence
- Observed
- Source
- VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance (NASA LANCE)
- Provider
- NASA LANCE
- Licence
- NASA open data
- Vintage
- daily; Satellite image
- Newest at build
- 2026-10-14
- Resolution
- about 250 m grid
- Uncertainty
- Satellite image. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
- Reached through
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
- Evidence
- Modelled (latest year GIBS publishes)
- Source
- MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1) (NASA LP DAAC)
- Provider
- NASA LP DAAC
- Licence
- NASA open data
- Vintage
- yearly; Satellite classification; latest year GIBS publishes
- Newest at build
- 2024-01-01
- Resolution
- about 500 m grid
- Uncertainty
- Satellite land cover classes for the year shown, including croplands; a classification with known errors, not a farm register.
- Reached through
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
- Evidence
- Observed (clouds leave gaps)
- Source
- MODIS Terra EVI (NASA LANCE)
- Provider
- NASA LANCE
- Licence
- NASA open data
- Vintage
- daily; Satellite index; clouds leave gaps
- Newest at build
- 2026-10-13
- Resolution
- about 250 m grid
- Uncertainty
- Satellite vegetation index for the 8 days to the date shown, a habitat condition indicator; not a measure of species or biodiversity.
- Reached through
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
- Evidence
- Observed (clouds leave gaps)
- Source
- MODIS Terra NDVI (NASA LANCE)
- Provider
- NASA LANCE
- Licence
- NASA open data
- Vintage
- daily; Satellite index; clouds leave gaps
- Newest at build
- 2026-10-13
- Resolution
- about 250 m grid
- Uncertainty
- Satellite greenness index over the 8 days to the date shown; an indicator of crop and pasture condition, not a yield estimate or a food security warning.
- Reached through
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
- Evidence
- Observed (clouds and night leave gaps)
- Source
- VIIRS NOAA-20 NDSI (NASA LANCE)
- Provider
- NASA LANCE
- Licence
- NASA open data
- Vintage
- daily; Satellite detection; clouds and night leave gaps
- Newest at build
- 2026-10-14
- Resolution
- about 500 m grid
- Uncertainty
- Satellite detection; clouds and night leave gaps. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
- Reached through
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
- Evidence
- Observed
- Source
- GHRSST MUR (NASA JPL PO.DAAC)
- Provider
- NASA JPL PO.DAAC
- Licence
- NASA open data
- Vintage
- daily; Satellite analysis
- Newest at build
- 2026-10-12
- Resolution
- about 1 km grid
- Uncertainty
- Satellite analysis. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
- Reached through
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
Earth observation, framed on the world.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.
Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERTSources and licences
- We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
- We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
- VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
- MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
- GHRSST Level 4 MUR analyses, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory; distributed by the NASA Physical Oceanography DAAC (PO.DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
- ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
- Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
- © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
- Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
- Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
- Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
- Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
- Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
- NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
- Past year, daily temperature and sunshine (NASA POWER): These data were obtained from the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) POWER Project funded through the NASA Earth Science/Applied Science Program..
- Weather data by Open-Meteo.com (https://open-meteo.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
- Optional layers (11 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.
Layers and dates
- True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
- Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024
- Enhanced vegetation index, rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra EVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
- Vegetation greenness (NDVI), rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra NDVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
- Snow cover: VIIRS NOAA-20 NDSI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
- Sea ice concentration: GHRSST MUR, NASA JPL PO.DAAC · 12 Oct 2026
The reference systems and units that make spatial risk results comparable.
| Element | Practice | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Coordinate reference system | Stated by its EPSG code; distances and areas computed in an equal-area or local projected system | Areas computed in geographic degrees are wrong away from the equator |
| Resolution | Grid cell size in metres or arc-seconds, and the scale of the source | A coarse population grid smears exposure across a floodplain edge |
| Vertical datum | Heights tied to a named datum and geoid model | Flood and sea-level work fails silently when datums differ by decimetres |
| Units of analysis | Administrative areas, catchments, hexagonal grids or networks, chosen for the question | The modifiable areal unit problem (Openshaw, 1984): results change with the zoning |
| Accuracy | Positional and thematic accuracy reported against reference data | A map without accuracy is a picture, not evidence |
Why spatial models need spatial cross-validation.
Nearby places resemble each other, so a model tested on points close to its training points looks better than it is. Roberts and colleagues showed in 2017 that blocked cross-validation, which holds out whole regions, gives a more honest estimate of how a model will perform in a place it has not seen. The same applies to building-footprint extraction, crop maps and flood susceptibility models.
- Hold out blocks or whole administrative units, not random points.
- Report accuracy per region and per class, not only overall accuracy.
- State where the model should not be used: outside the range of its training conditions.
Interoperable spatial evidence, with national geography kept national.
GCRI follows the UN Integrated Geospatial Information Framework, under which national geospatial agencies hold authoritative boundaries and base data. It uses Open Geospatial Consortium standards so layers move between systems. GCRI maps are research products; legal boundaries and authoritative base maps remain with national authorities. Geospatial datasets would carry ISO 19115 and NS-3b metadata under the proposed Nexus Standards, and released layers feed the Country Systems Risk and Resilience series. Contributions that help: corrections to base data in places maps miss, local field validation and reference samples for accuracy checks.
Where geospatial results can mislead.
Maps persuade easily, which is why their limits are stated beside them.
- Scale and aggregation: the same data grouped into different areas can show different patterns
- Boundaries: administrative units rarely match watersheds, grids or labour markets
- Distance is not access: straight-line buffers can misstate how far people really are from services
- Data gaps: informal settlements, rural areas and recent change are often missing from base maps
- Interpolation: surfaces built from sparse samples carry uncertainty that must be shown
How GCRI keeps spatial work checkable.
- 01
State the coordinate reference system
So layers align and distances are correct.
- 02
Test sensitivity to scale
Results are checked at more than one level of aggregation.
- 03
Validate spatially
Models are tested on places they were not trained on.
- 04
Respect sensitivity
Restricted infrastructure locations and protected community sites are never published.
Connected pages.
See Earth observation for sensors and imagery, and risk science for how spatial layers combine into risk. Spatial and common-picture work runs in Foundry, including NXS-NST (civilian common operating picture).
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
- UN Integrated Geospatial Information Framework, Part 1 (UN-GGIM, 2018)
- Openshaw, The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography 38 (1984)
- Roberts and others, Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical or phylogenetic structure, Ecography 40 (2017)
- OGC API standards, including OGC API Features (Open Geospatial Consortium)
- ISO 19115-1:2014 Geographic information, metadata, fundamentals (ISO)
- NS-3b, Dataset and product metadata profile (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O), a proposed standard
Questions and answers.
Do GCRI maps replace the maps of mandated agencies?
How are boundaries shown?
Can I get GIS layers?
Why does scale matter so much?
Can communities contribute local mapping?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GCRISend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGCRISee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.