GCRI · Water Nexus

Shared river basins

Many of the world’s largest rivers, lakes and aquifers cross national borders, and a large share of the world’s people live in shared basins. A dam, a diversion or a drought upstream changes what arrives downstream. This page sets out how shared basins are observed, how the evidence is made comparable across borders, and what joint institutions need before they can decide.

01Register

Shared river basins on the record.

02The question

Shared river basins: how the risk develops.

Transboundary evidence and institutions. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Upstream use, downstream effect

Storage changes timing, abstraction changes volume, and both change the sediment and nutrient loads that deltas and fisheries depend on.

Mechanism

Asymmetric information

Each riparian measures its own reach with its own methods. Evidence that is not comparable across the border cannot settle a dispute; it feeds one.

Mechanism

Climate shifts the baseline

Treaties written for a historical flow regime meet a changed one. Allocation rules fixed in volumes fail when the volume is no longer there.

Mechanism

Joint institutions

Basin commissions work when they hold a shared data platform, agreed methods and a procedure for notification. The evidence is the institution’s first product.

03Geography

Water now in the Nile Basin.

Flood water, rain and root-zone soil moisture over the Nile Basin, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

Water now, for this page

About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
VIIRS Global Flood Product (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
GPM IMERG (NASA GES DISC)
Provider
NASA GES DISC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite estimate, near real time
Newest at build
2026-10-12
Resolution
about 2 km grid
Uncertainty
Satellite estimate, near real time. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Modelled
Source
SMAP Level 4 (NASA NSIDC DAAC)
Provider
NASA NSIDC DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Model with satellite data assimilated
Newest at build
2026-10-11
Resolution
about 2 km grid
Uncertainty
Model with satellite data assimilated. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite image
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite image. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University))
Provider
NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University)
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Vintage
null; Census-based estimate, static (2020)
Resolution
about 1 km grid
Uncertainty
Census-based estimate of people per square kilometre in 2020, shown as exposure context; not a count of people affected by any hazard.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Modelled (latest year GIBS publishes)
Source
MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1) (NASA LP DAAC)
Provider
NASA LP DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
yearly; Satellite classification; latest year GIBS publishes
Newest at build
2024-01-01
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite land cover classes for the year shown, including croplands; a classification with known errors, not a farm register.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

Water now, framed on the Nile Basin.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · NASA GPM IMERG Early · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERTSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • GPM IMERG precipitation, NASA Precipitation Processing System; distributed by the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • SMAP Level 4 soil moisture and snow mass, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office; distributed by the NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center DAAC; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
  • Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Live: NASA GPM IMERG Early. We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • River discharge forecast, 30 days with range (GloFAS via Open-Meteo): Contains modified Copernicus Emergency Management Service information 2026; not a flood warning.
  • Past year, daily temperature (ERA5 via Open-Meteo): Contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2026.
  • Past year, daily temperature and sunshine (NASA POWER): These data were obtained from the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) POWER Project funded through the NASA Earth Science/Applied Science Program..
  • Weather data by Open-Meteo.com (https://open-meteo.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
  • Optional layers (14 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Flood water, 3-day composite: VIIRS Global Flood Product, NASA LANCE · 14 Oct 2026
  • Precipitation rate, daily mean: GPM IMERG, NASA GES DISC · 12 Oct 2026
  • Root-zone soil moisture, 0 to 100 cm: SMAP Level 4, NASA NSIDC DAAC · 11 Oct 2026
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024

04Couplings

Why a shared basin couples countries as well as sectors.

DomainHow it couples hereWhat to watch
EnergyUpstream dams change the timing of flow for downstream irrigation and fisheries. See hydropower and water.Reservoir operating rules shared between riparian states
FoodDownstream deltas depend on flow and sediment for farming and fisheries.Sediment delivery and salinity intrusion in deltas
HealthWater quality and disease risks cross borders with the river.Joint water quality monitoring stations
BiodiversityMigratory fish and floodplain ecosystems need basin-wide flow regimes. See wetlands and freshwater.Fish passage and environmental flow agreements

Two global conventions frame cooperation: the UN Watercourses Convention of 1997, in force since 2014, and the UNECE Water Convention of 1992, open to all UN member states since 2016. SDG indicator 6.5.2 measures the share of transboundary basin area covered by an operational arrangement.

05Monitor

Shared basin data exchange.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Shared basin data exchange

Shared river basins · Shared basin · Riparian states A, B, C

Exchange on scheduleGCRI · Water Nexus

Joint fact-finding

  1. Data protocolagreed
  2. Gauge harmonisationdone
  3. Joint modelrunning
  4. Scenario setdraft
  5. Commission review
  6. Publication

Data exchange status

per agreement annex

Border gauge 1ADailyOn time
Border gauge 2BDailyOn time
Dam release logCWeeklyOn time
Water quality setBMonthlyMissing

Flow at border points

  • State A
  • State B
  • State C

Notifications under the agreement

  1. N-1Planned release change, reservoir C2Prior notice period running10 d
  2. N-2New abstraction scheme, State AConsultation open15 d
Shared basin data exchange: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Shared river basins.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
06Reports, standards and contributions

Basin evidence, regional reports and shared data.

Basin studies are designed for the Regional Systems series. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) takes no position in any water dispute and allocates no water; that belongs to the riparian states and their basin organisations. Data shared between states keeps its originating agency and terms, catalogued under the proposed Nexus Standards.

  • Basin organisation data products offered for joint analysis.
  • Historical treaty and agreement records with their sources.
  • Corrections where a basin is described inaccurately.
07Simulator

Route a storm through a river network.

Rain becomes runoff by the curve number method, drains each sub-catchment through a linear reservoir and travels down the main stem by Muskingum routing; play it to watch the flood wave move and flatten. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction. The map on this page shows The Nile Basin; the model itself is not tied to a place.

Controls

Storm rainfall depth
120 mm
Storm duration
12 h
Curve number (soil and land cover)
78
Catchment area
800 km²
Reaches on the main stem
5
Travel time per reach (Muskingum K)
6.0 h
Muskingum X (storage weighting)
0.20
Channel capacity per unit area
300 L/s per km²

Readouts

Peak discharge at the outlet
452 m³/s
Time to peak
21.6 h
Attenuation by the channel
61%
Hours over capacity
26.4 h
Runoff coefficient
52%
Numbers, methods and sources
HourOutlet (m³/s)Unrouted (m³/s)Upper reach (m³/s)
2.40.0678.90.0
12.0308.31,151.4181.8
21.6452.435.173.7
31.2363.31.111.1
40.8198.80.01.5
50.479.30.00.2
60.025.40.00.0
69.66.90.00.0
79.21.70.00.0
88.80.40.00.0
98.40.10.00.0
108.00.00.00.0
117.60.00.00.0
127.20.00.00.0
136.80.00.00.0

Methods

  1. Curve number runoff USDA Soil Conservation Service (1972), National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology
  2. Linear reservoir Nash (1957), The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph, IAHS 45
  3. Muskingum channel routing McCarthy (1938); Cunge (1969), Journal of Hydraulic Research 7
  4. Uncertainty fan (parameter Monte Carlo) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  5. One-at-a-time sensitivity (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Rivers Natural Earth
  • Lakes and reservoirs Natural Earth
  • Cities Natural Earth
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG) NASA GPM IMERG Early · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • River discharge forecast, 30 days with range (GloFAS via Open-Meteo) Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), Copernicus GloFAS · register open-meteo.public-pages
  • Surface soil moisture (SMAP) NASA SMAP · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • Surface water, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-HLS) NASA JPL OPERA DSWx-HLS (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026) · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar) NASA JPL OPERA DSWx-S1 (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel-1 data 2026) · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
Route a storm through a river network. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: Curve number runoff (USDA Soil Conservation Service (1972), National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology); Linear reservoir (Nash (1957), The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph, IAHS 45); Muskingum channel routing (McCarthy (1938); Cunge (1969), Journal of Hydraulic Research 7).

Across the six pillars, led by Nexus Consortium

08Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Border-crossing flowcubic metres per seconddailyGauges at agreed pointsPublished statistics
Reservoir storage in the basincubic kilometresmonthlyOperator reports, satellite altimetry and extentESTIMATED
Sediment loadtonnes per yearannualSampling, turbidity proxiesESTIMATED
Delta salinity intrusion lengthkilometresdry seasonStation salinity, modelsOBSERVED
Basin precipitation by countrymillimetres per monthmonthlyGauge and satellite rainfallESTIMATED
Environmental flow compliancepercent of months meeting the agreed flowannualGauges against the agreed regimePublished statistics
09Twin and cascade simulator

Model shared river basins as a system. Run the cascade.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Water utilities and basins: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

  • Dam failure
  • River flood (set off downstream)
  • Flash flood (set off downstream)
  • Mass displacement (set off downstream)
  • Widespread power outage (set off downstream)
  • Water supply shortfall (set off downstream)

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-10 Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations: definition, binding, evaluation and enforcement)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NRS-N1 Water risk and resilience
  • NRS-U28 Universe platform profile: Water Nexus
  • NRS-H85 Hazard family: Water and wastewater system failure (NHS-1 infra.water-systems)
  • NRS-H53 Hazard family: Cyber-physical disruption (NHS-1 cyber.cyber-physical)
  • NRS-H48 Hazard family: Utility and communication network outage (NHS-1 infra.utilities)
  • NRS-H84 Hazard family: Energy system instability and shortfall (NHS-1 infra.energy)

Observation

  • Aqueduct 4.0 Water Risk Atlas (listed for reference)
  • AQUASTAT (listed for reference)
  • World Development Indicators (listed for reference)
  • GloFAS global flood forecasts (listed for reference)
  • Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services
  • Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources
  • Proportion of transboundary basin area with an operational arrangement for water cooperation
  • Number of disruptions to basic services attributed to disasters
  • People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population)

Example geography

  • The Ganges and Brahmaputra Basin: 178 hexagonal cells
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
  • Surface soil moisture (SMAP), NASA GIBS
10Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
River basin organisationsAgreed gauge records, notifications, joint assessmentsTerms per organisation
Satellite altimetry (Copernicus, NASA)River and reservoir levels where gauges are absent or unsharedFree and open, attribution
JRC Global Surface WaterReservoir extent change over decadesFree and open, attribution
Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (Oregon State University)Treaties and events in shared basinsTerms per database
CHIRPS and ERA5Basin rainfall independent of any single riparianPublic domain; free and open
11Sector signature

The sector signature of shared river basins.

The sectors shared river basins touches and how strongly they depend on each other: what a study has to observe and model together.

Select corners · hover lines6 / 15 relations

Signature

Water and its partners

Water gives irrigation to food (0.8), cooling water and hydropower to energy (0.6) and environmental flows to biodiversity (0.6).

W · E · I · F · H · B

Sectors
4 of 6
Relations
6 of 15
Coupling
0.43 share of total

Strongest relations in play

  • Food → Biodiversity · land conversion0.6
  • Water → Energy · cooling water and hydropower0.6
  • Water → Food · irrigation0.8
  • Water → Biodiversity · environmental flows0.6
Teaching values for a typical city-region, not measurements for any place. Coupling is the summed strength of the relations in play, as a share of all fifteen.
12Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Water Nexus prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
Basin commissions and riparian ministriesWhether a planned dam or diversion changes flows beyond the agreed regimeIndependent storage and flow estimates, scenario sets with the regime as reference
Delta authoritiesWhen dry-season intrusion threatens drinking water and crops, and what releases would relieve itSalinity intrusion length against upstream storage and release schedules
Development finance institutionsWhether a project’s basin-wide effects are evidenced before financingBasin accounts and scenarios with labels; readiness questions prepared with the Global Risks Alliance (GRA)

Outputs this topic produces

  • Comparable basin-wide water accounts
  • Independent flow and storage estimates where records are not shared
  • Scenario sets for allocation under changed regimes
  • Notification-ready evidence packs
13Methods and evidence

How shared river basins is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

System model

The couplings between the systems in shared river basins: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−++WaterClimateCritical infrastructureCommunitiesEconomyR reinforcingB balancing
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
14Core questions

What basin scientists ask.

  • How do upstream abstraction, storage and land use affect downstream flow and quality?
  • What data exist on each side of a border, and are they compatible?
  • How can evidence be produced that all riparian parties can examine and accept as a common basis?
  • How will climate change alter flows that existing agreements assume?
15Mechanisms

How upstream and downstream connect.

Dams and reservoirs change the timing of flow, storing wet-season water for dry-season use or power generation. Irrigation withdrawals reduce flow and return water of lower quality. Sediment trapped behind dams starves downstream deltas, which can then subside and suffer salinisation.

Agreements often allocate fixed volumes or proportions based on historical records. When climate change alters the flow regime, those allocations can become impossible to meet, and disputes turn on whose data and models are right. Shared, transparent evidence does not resolve disputes, but it narrows them.

16Methods and data

Building a shared evidence base.

  1. 01

    Joint monitoring

    Coordinated gauging and water quality sampling with agreed methods. Data sharing may be limited by national security or commercial considerations.

  2. 02

    Independent observation

    Earth observation provides consistent observations of reservoirs, river width, irrigation and snow across borders, with lower precision than ground data.

  3. 03

    Basin models

    Whole-basin models used to test scenarios of development and climate, with uncertainty quantification. Their credibility depends on transparent assumptions accepted by all parties.

20Questions

Questions and answers.

Can satellites replace shared gauges?
No, but they give every riparian an independent estimate with a stated error, which is often enough to start a conversation that unshared gauges cannot.
Does Water Nexus mediate disputes?
No. It prepares comparable evidence. Mediation and negotiation belong to the riparians and their institutions.
Why are flow volumes a weak basis for treaties?
Because the climate changes the volume. Shares of actual flow, with agreed environmental minimums, survive a changed regime better than fixed quantities.
Does Water Nexus mediate water disputes?
No. GCRI does science. Convening and dialogue are the role of The Global Risks Forum (GRF), and decisions remain with the riparian parties.
Can satellite data settle disagreements about flow?
It can provide a consistent, independent view, but it has its own uncertainty and needs ground validation. It informs, rather than settles, disagreements.
What makes transboundary evidence credible?
Agreed methods, transparent assumptions, open documentation of data gaps and the ability of each party to re-run or inspect the analysis. Evidence that one side cannot examine is rarely accepted as a common basis.
Are basin data published openly?
Data are published only where the providers’ terms allow. Each dataset carries its source, licence and limitations in the source register.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIWater NexusGlobal Sector Risk and ResilienceCountry Systems Risk and ResilienceObservatory Signal
Water Nexus

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.