GCRI · 인공지능과 자율 시스템
노동과 사회적 영향
AI changes which tasks people do, how work is organised, which skills are valued and how information spreads. Effects differ by occupation, country, gender and age, and depend on how firms and governments choose to deploy it. This page sets out how AI affects work and society, how exposure and impacts are measured, and what evidence serves the labour ministries, employers, unions and educators involved.
Labour and social effects on the record.
Labour and social effects: how the risk develops.
Work, education, public trust and inclusion. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Tasks change before jobs do
AI automates or assists specific tasks within occupations. Jobs are reorganised around remaining tasks before they disappear or new ones form.
Exposure is uneven
Clerical and some professional tasks are highly exposed to generative AI, while manual and interpersonal work is less exposed. Women are over-represented in some highly exposed clerical jobs.
Skills and training lag
Workers need new skills to use AI well, and those displaced need retraining. Training 시스템 often respond more slowly than technology adoption.
Information ecosystems shift
Generated content, recommendation systems and synthetic media change how people find and judge information, with effects on trust and public debate.
How labour and social effects is modelled, measured and tested.
모형, 그 가정, 데이터, 불확실성을 과학자나 엔지니어가 확인할 형태로 제시합니다. 구조는 발행된 방법을 따릅니다. 제시된 값은 예시이며 결과가 아닙니다.
시스템 모형
The couplings between the systems in labour and social effects: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
AI’s effects on work vary across domains.
Labour studies are designed for the 기하급수적 기술 시리즈. The ILO’s 2023 working paper estimates exposure, not job loss, and finds clerical work most exposed.
- Firm-level adoption studies.
- Worker surveys on task change.
측정되는 것과 그 정확도.
각 지표에는 단위, 주기, 그 뒤의 출처 종류, 값에 붙을 근거 표시가 있습니다. 값은 표시하지 않습니다. 값은 프로그램이 자체 권한으로 제공합니다.
| 지표 | 단위 | 주기 | 출처 유형 | 라벨 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment in occupations highly exposed to AI | percent of employment | 평가별 | Exposure studies using occupational data | 추정 |
| Firms using AI | percent of firms | 연간 | Business surveys | 보고됨 |
| Workers using AI tools at work | percent of workers | per survey | Labour force and worker surveys | 보고됨 |
| AI-related job postings | share of postings | 월별 | Online job posting data | 관측 |
| Participation in AI skills training | percent of workforce | 연간 | Training surveys | 보고됨 |
| Wage changes in exposed occupations | percent change | 연간 | Wage statistics | 공표 통계 |
근거의 출처.
이름이 명시된 공개 데이터셋과 기관 기록으로, 각각 라이선스 등급이 있습니다. 협약에 따른 출처는 그 조건에 따라서만 사용하며 결코 재게시하지 않습니다.
| 출처 | 제공하는 것 | 라이선스 등급 |
|---|---|---|
| ILO studies on generative AI exposure of occupations | Occupational exposure estimates by country and gender | Public, ILO terms |
| OECD Employment Outlook and AI in work studies | Evidence on AI adoption and labour effects | Public, OECD terms |
| Eurostat ICT usage in enterprises survey | Share of enterprises using AI | Open, Eurostat reuse policy |
| Online job posting data such as Lightcast summaries | Demand for AI skills | Commercial; public summaries (to check) |
| Stanford AI Index | Compiled indicators on AI adoption, investment and labour | Public, licence to check |
누가 결정하며 근거는 무엇에 쓰이는지.
인공지능과 자율 시스템 prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 결정 주체 | 질문 | 이 페이지가 제공하는 근거 |
|---|---|---|
| Labour ministries | Which workers and sectors need transition support | Exposure analyses; adoption tracking |
| Employers and unions | How to introduce AI at work and share its gains | Adoption and wage evidence |
| 교육 and training bodies | Which skills to teach and to whom | Skills demand evidence |
이 주제가 생산하는 산출물
- Occupational exposure analyses by sector, gender and region
- Adoption tracking from business and worker surveys
- Evaluation designs for AI training programmes
- Evidence notes for social dialogue on AI at work
What researchers ask about social effects.
- Which tasks can current AI perform well, and how does that map onto occupations?
- Does AI substitute for workers, complement them or change what their jobs consist of?
- How does AI change learning and assessment in education?
- How do errors, opacity and misuse affect trust, and who is excluded?
Tasks, not jobs.
Jobs are bundles of tasks. AI tends to automate or assist specific tasks, such as drafting, summarising, coding or classifying images, which changes the content of jobs rather than simply removing them. Whether that raises productivity and wages or displaces workers depends on how organisations redesign work and how gains are shared.
In education, AI can personalise support but also undermine assessment and the learning that comes from effort. Trust depends on experience: visible errors, unexplained decisions and synthetic content erode it, while accountable use can build it. People with limited digital access, skills or language support risk exclusion.
Evidence on social effects.
- 01
Task exposure analysis
Mapping AI capabilities onto occupational task data. Exposure is not the same as displacement.
- 02
Field and natural experiments
Studying workplaces and classrooms that adopt AI, using 사회 및 행동 과학. Early studies may not generalise.
- 03
Surveys of trust and use
Measuring how people use and perceive AI. Attitudes change quickly and vary by context.
- 04
역량 평가
Linking what 시스템 can actually do, from AI 평가 및 보증 공학, to claims about social effects.
연구되는 방식과 방법이 말할 수 없는 것.
Where this page’s references lead.
이 페이지를 읽을 때 기준이 되는 기구와 문서. 상태와 판은 바뀌며, 각 링크는 발행 기구로 연결됩니다.
질문과 답변.
Will AI take jobs?
What is occupational exposure to AI?
Who is most exposed to generative AI?
Will AI cause mass unemployment?
Which workers are most exposed?
How does this topic relate to Future of Work and Skills?
Does the platform advise employers?
이 페이지에서 증거를 기여하십시오.
보고서 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 이메일게이트웨이 GW-GCRI이 페이지에서 보내기증거, 정정, 사례, 방법, 검토, 번역 또는 프로필 입력 자료. 이 페이지의 태그가 붙어 도착하므로, 이를 담당하는 편집자가 받게 됩니다.
- Zenodo개방형 예치기탁하고 커뮤니티에 제출하기ORCID iD로 Zenodo에 직접 기록을 게시한 뒤, 그곳의 Reports 커뮤니티에 제출하십시오. 큐레이터가 검토하며, DOI는 귀하의 것으로 남습니다.
- 보고서GCRI모든 기여 방법 보기기여 유형, 각각의 검토 방식, 받게 되는 크레디트, 라이선스, 그리고 절대 받지 않는 것.
개인정보, 민감한 인프라 세부 정보, 공유할 권리가 없는 자료는 절대 보내지 마십시오. 기여물은 사용 전에 검토됩니다. 기여물을 보낸다고 해서 저작자 지위나 편집 권한이 부여되지 않으며, 후원으로 조사 결과를 얻을 수 없습니다.
방법, 데이터세트 또는 질문을 가져오십시오.
정보와 문의는 오늘부터 열려 있습니다. 문의에는 참조 번호가 부여되고 다음 단계가 안내됩니다. 신청, 결제, 컴퓨팅 할당, 등록은 해당 팀, 약관, 심사 역량이 갖추어졌을 때만 열립니다.
법률 문서.
이 사이트의 지도, 데이터와 그림은 맥락과 일반 정보로 제시됩니다. 조언, 예보 또는 경보가 아니며, 정보의 한계는 면책 고지와 데이터 고지에 나와 있습니다.