Skip to content

GCRI · 气候与灾害

气候服务与预警

Climate services turn observations, forecasts and projections into information people can use: daily forecasts, seasonal outlooks, warnings and climate guidance for sectors. A warning only works if it reaches people in time, in a form they understand, and if they know what to do. This page sets out how services and warning 系统 are organised, how forecasts are verified, and what evidence serves the services and authorities that run them.

01画布

工作如何开展。

系统 · 围绕本主题示意
Multi-hazard outlook: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Climate services and warnings.示例名称和示意数值;是设计方案,并非记录或实时系统。

图Multi-hazard outlook: example names and illustrative values, not a record or a live system.

02问题

Climate services and warnings: how the risk develops.

Forecast-to-user pathways and authority. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

机制

Detection and forecasting

Observing networks, radar, satellites and numerical models detect developing hazards and forecast them. 提前量 and skill vary by hazard, from days for cyclones to minutes for flash floods.

机制

Impact-based warnings

Warnings that describe what the weather will do, such as roads flooding or buildings at risk, prompt more action than warnings that only give rainfall amounts or wind speeds.

机制

The last mile

Warnings must reach everyone through broadcast, mobile alerts, sirens and community networks, in local languages and accessible formats. Gaps fall hardest on remote, poor and marginalised people.

机制

Trust and response

People act on warnings they trust and understand. False alarms, unclear authority and conflicting messages erode trust, while drills and preparedness turn warnings into action.

03地理

Hazards now worldwide.

全球的洪水水体、人口密度和活跃火点,来自 NASA GIBS。每个图层均标有各自日期。

交互式地图需要JavaScript;图层列表和来源见下文。

图层 3

本页面的当前危害

关于本图层
证据
观测(云层造成缺口)
来源
VIIRS 全球洪水产品(NASA LANCE)
提供方
NASA LANCE
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;卫星探测;云层造成缺口
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-14
处理结果
约 250 米网格
不确定性
卫星探测;云层造成缺口。卫星或模型栅格数据,按提供方发布的原样呈现。云层、条带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声;数值是指标,而非某地的测量值。
经由以下途径到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许实时地图后访问
关于本图层
证据
估计值
来源
世界网格化人口 v4.11(NASA SEDAC(哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN))
提供方
NASA SEDAC(哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN)
许可协议
CC BY 4.0
年份版本
null;基于人口普查的估算,静态(2020)
处理结果
约 1 公里网格
不确定性
基于人口普查的 2020 年每平方公里人口估算,作为风险暴露背景展示;不是受任何危害影响的人数。
经由以下途径到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许实时地图后访问
关于本图层
证据
观测(云层和过境时间造成缺口)
来源
VIIRS NOAA-20 375 米(FIRMS)(NASA LANCE FIRMS)
提供方
NASA LANCE FIRMS
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;卫星探测;云层和过境时间造成缺口
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-13
处理结果
约 500 米网格
不确定性
所示日期的卫星热点探测结果,包括天然气火炬和工业热源;并非已确认的火情、事件报告或预警。
经由以下途径到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许实时地图后访问
关于本图层
证据
观测
来源
VIIRS NOAA-20 校正反射率(NASA LANCE)
提供方
NASA LANCE
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;卫星图像
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-14
处理结果
约 250 米网格
不确定性
卫星图像。卫星或模型栅格数据,按提供方发布的原样呈现。云层、条带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声;数值是指标,而非某地的测量值。
经由以下途径到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许实时地图后访问
关于本图层
证据
估计值
来源
GPM IMERG(NASA GES DISC)
提供方
NASA GES DISC
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;近实时卫星估算
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-12
处理结果
约 2 公里网格
不确定性
近实时卫星估算。卫星或模型栅格数据,按提供方发布的原样呈现。云层、条带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声;数值是指标,而非某地的测量值。
经由以下途径到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许实时地图后访问
关于本图层
证据
模型生成(GIBS 发布的最新年份)
来源
MODIS Terra 和 Aqua 土地覆盖(MCD12Q1)(NASA LP DAAC)
提供方
NASA LP DAAC
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每年;卫星分类;GIBS 发布的最新年份
构建时的最新内容
2024-01-01
处理结果
约 500 米网格
不确定性
所示年份的卫星土地覆盖类别,含农田;该分类存在已知误差,并非农场登记册。
经由以下途径到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许实时地图后访问

最新可用

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap贡献者 (ODbL) · Natural Earth

正在加载最新的NASA影像。

拖动以移动。按住 Ctrl 或 ⌘ 并滚动、双指缩放或使用按钮缩放;悬停可查看指针下的数值;重置可返回该区域。

Hazards now, framed on the world.NASA 发布的卫星和模型产品,各带自己的日期。它们是指标,而非对任何地点的评估。

数据:NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap 贡献者 · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · 美国地质调查局 · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT来源与许可

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA 开放数据
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA 开放数据
  • VIIRS 近实时产品(洪水、地表温度、积雪覆盖、校正反射率),NASA LANCE;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). 采用 CC BY 4.0 许可。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • NASA 资源管理火灾信息系统(FIRMS),VIIRS 375 m 活跃火点产品,NASA LANCE;矢量瓦片来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • GPM IMERG 降水,NASA 降水处理系统;由 NASA 戈达德地球科学数据和信息服务中心(GES DISC)分发;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • MODIS 陆地产品(植被指数、总初级生产力、土地覆盖),NASA LP DAAC 和 LANCE;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • ASTER GDEM 是 METI 和 NASA 的产品(ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003,NASA LP DAAC);影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。引用格式:NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA 开放数据
  • 使用 Natural Earth 制作。免费矢量和栅格地图数据,见 naturalearthdata.com。 公有领域
  • © OpenStreetMap 贡献者(ODbL),经由 NASA GIBS(海岸线、边界、道路和地名)。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 ODbL
  • Blue Marble,NASA Earth Observatory;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • 地球仪和平面地图上的背景信息:海岸线、边界、道路和地名来自 NASA GIBS 参考图层(OpenStreetMap 数据,ODbL,© OpenStreetMap contributors);Blue Marble 影像可作为可选底图;3D 地形和高程读数来自 ASTER GDEM 高程色彩指数(5 m 至 200 m 分级,为便于辨识而作了夸张处理)。边界按已发布的样式绘制,不代表对任何领土的立场。
  • 实时事件:NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker(EONET);事件仅供参考,并保留其原始来源链接。
  • 实时:NASA EONET。事件仅供参考,不是主管机构的预警。
  • 实时:美国地质调查局。事件仅供参考,不是主管机构的预警。
  • Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • 河流流量预报,30天及区间(GloFAS,经Open-Meteo):包含经修改的Copernicus Emergency Management Service 2026年信息;非洪水警报。
  • 天气数据来自 Open-Meteo.com (https://open-meteo.com/), 依据 CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 授权。
  • 可选图层(图层列表中有 20 个数据源:实时、预报、观测和背景)在开启时,会在地图上和此处注明其提供方;预报为模型输出,衍生指数为估算值。

图层与日期

  • 洪水水体,3 日合成:VIIRS 全球洪水产品,NASA LANCE · 2026年10月14日
  • 人口密度,2020 年:人口:哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN,世界网格化人口 v4.11(2018),NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · 静态
  • 活跃火点与热异常:VIIRS NOAA-20 375 m(FIRMS),NASA LANCE FIRMS · 2026年10月13日
  • 真彩色:VIIRS NOAA-20 校正反射率,NASA LANCE · 2026年10月13日
  • 降水率,日均值:GPM IMERG,NASA GES DISC · 2026年10月12日
  • 土地覆盖类型(IGBP),年度:MODIS Terra 和 Aqua 土地覆盖(MCD12Q1),NASA LP DAAC · 2024

04跨领域

Climate services are useful only when each domain can act on them.

Service evaluations are designed for the 证据简报系列. The Global Framework for Climate Services and Early Warnings for All frame the work; warnings use the Common Alerting Protocol and are issued only by mandated agencies.

  • User evaluations of climate services.
  • Records of how a warning was received and acted on.
05模拟器

存量、流量、延迟和一个临界阈值。

两个存量,即压力和 适应能力,由一个增强的增长回路、一个延迟的平衡响应以及压力超过能力时产生的损害相连;越过阈值后,系统可能发生突变。这是使用明示示例数值的教学模型,不是预测。

控制措施

压力增长
每年 6.0%
能力在降低压力方面的效力
每年 4.0%
对感知压力的投资响应
20%
感知延迟
4.0 年
压力的临界阈值
60 项指数
越过阈值后的放大
2.0 倍
模拟年数
50 年

读数

峰值压力
113 指数
期末能力
186 指数
超过阈值的年数
15.8 年
数字、方法与来源
年份压力能力感知
020.050.020.0
423.344.921.2
827.242.224.0
1231.742.327.7
1636.845.532.2
2042.351.537.2
2447.960.342.6
2853.271.348.0
3257.884.353.1
3666.498.458.4
4082.7115.969.7
4497.8139.783.8
48109.1169.497.3

方法

  1. 系统动力学 Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
  2. 临界转变与临界点 Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
  3. 因果回路图 Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
  4. 不确定性扇形图(参数蒙特卡罗) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  5. 单因素敏感性(龙卷风图) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

数据

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

存量、流量、延迟和临界阈值。示意性教学模型:它依据控件设定的数值运行,而非实测数据。方法:System dynamics (Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics);Critical transitions and tipping points (Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461);Causal loop diagram (Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill)。
06指标

衡量什么,以及衡量得如何。

每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值:数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。

指标单位节奏来源类型标签
预报技巧continuous ranked probability skill score against a referenceper verification cycle预报检验观测
警告 lead timehours between warning issue and hazard onset每个事件Warning logs and event records观测
Population covered by multi-hazard 早期预警percent of population年度《仙台框架》 Monitor target G已发布统计
Warnings in Common Alerting Protocolpercent of warnings issued in CAP年度Alert feeds and WMO Register of Alerting Authorities观测
False alarm ratioratio of warnings without the hazardper verification cycleWarning verification观测
People who received and acted on a warningpercent of surveyed populationper surveyPost-event surveys已报告
07孪生与级联模拟器

Model climate services and warnings as a system. Run the cascade.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile 气候风险标准: the hazards it names, the 系统 and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

灾害

  • 海平面上升
  • Coastal flood (在下游引发)
  • 风暴潮 (在下游引发)
  • High-tide flooding (set off downstream)
  • Coastal erosion (set off downstream)
  • Saltwater intrusion (set off downstream)
  • Estuary flood (set off downstream)
  • Coastal habitat squeeze (set off downstream)
  • Wetland loss (set off downstream)
  • Mangrove loss (set off downstream)
  • Groundwater flood (set off downstream)
  • Climate-driven migration and relocation (set off downstream)
  • 大规模流离失所(在下游引发)

控制措施

  • NS-0 章程与原则
  • NS-1 维持社会运转的 UNI 与制品目录(语法 v0.2:领域、部门、区域和环境分段)
  • NS-3 风险记录 UNI(语法、旧编码对照、分配机构)
  • NS-3b 数据集与产品元数据规范(STAC、DCAT、PROV-O)
  • NS-9 情境 UNI(部署、实例、计划实例)
  • NS-11 验证与监测(证据、证明、零信任符合性观测)
  • NS-14 符合性及与外部标准的对照
  • NRS-H65 危害类别:超越行星边界(NHS-1 planet.boundary)
  • NRS-H62 危害类别:复合与多危害事件(NHS-1 sys.compound)
  • NRS-H71 危害类别:深时与宇宙灾难(NHS-1 planet.deep-time)
  • NRS-H79 危害类别:精神卫生危机(NHS-1 health.mental)
  • NRS-H75 危害类别:气候敏感性疾病(NHS-1 health.climate-sensitive)
  • NRS-H7 危害类别:大尺度环流异常(NHS-1 atmo.climate-mode)

观测

  • ERA5 再分析(Copernicus Climate Data Store)(仅列作参考)
  • CMIP6 气候预估(Copernicus Climate Data Store)(仅列作参考)
  • NGFS Scenario Explorer(仅列作参考)
  • INFORM Risk Index(仅列作参考)
  • 每100,000人中因灾害死亡、失踪和直接受影响的人数
  • Total greenhouse gas emissions per year
  • 灾害造成的直接经济损失与全球国内生产总值之比

示例地理范围

  • 太平洋岛国:150 个六边形网格
  • 今夜夜间灯光与停电(VIIRS 昼夜波段),NASA GIBS
  • 穿透云层的地表水,30 m(OPERA DSWx-S1 雷达),NASA GIBS
  • 过去半小时降雨率(IMERG),NASA GIBS
  • Vegetation disturbance alerts, 30 m (OPERA DIST-ALERT), NASA GIBS
08来源

证据来自何处。

具名公共数据集与机构记录,各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用,绝不再次发布。

来源它提供什么许可类别
WMO State of Climate Services reportsStatus of climate services capacity by country and sectorPublic, WMO terms of use
《仙台框架》 Monitor, target GNational reporting on 早期预警 coverage and risk information公开,联合国使用条款
WMO Register of Alerting AuthoritiesAlerting authorities and their CAP feedsPublic, WMO terms
Early Warnings for All initiative reportsProgress on the four pillars of early warningPublic, terms per publishing agency
Copernicus Emergency Management Service early warning 系统European and global flood, drought and fire forecastsFree, Copernicus terms
09方法与证据

How climate services and warnings is modelled, measured and tested.

模型、其假设、数据和不确定性,以科学家或工程师会核查的形式呈现。结构遵循已发表的方法。所取数值仅为示意,不是研究发现。

不确定性区间

How far the outlook for climate services and warnings could spread, shown as ranges rather than a single line.

现在+5+10+15+20+25+30 y高低很可能区间可能区间
中心估计值
集合的中位数
范围
IPCC 校准用语中的“可能”和“很可能”
集合
明示成员、情景和初始条件
配合阅读
结果对每项输入的敏感性
示意性的指数尺度集合离散度;形式遵循 IPCC 不确定性指南。并非预测。
FAIR 指导原则 · GO FAIR 和 FORCE11W3C PROV · 万维网联盟关于一致处理不确定性的指南 · IPCCCEOS 分析就绪数据 · 地球观测卫星委员会
10决定

由谁决定,以及证据服务于什么。

Climate and Hazards prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

谁来决定问题本页面服务的证据
National meteorological and hydrological servicesWhere to invest in observing, forecasting and warning capacityVerification results; service maturity profiles
民防主管机构How warnings translate into protective action and evacuationWarning chain reviews; post-event surveys
Telecommunications regulatorsHow mobile networks carry public alertsWarning dissemination coverage; CAP adoption
Development partners哪些 早期预警 gaps to supportEarly Warnings for All pillar assessments

该主题产生的产出

  • Verification summaries of forecast and warning performance
  • Warning chain reviews from detection to community response
  • Service maturity profiles against the Global Framework for Climate Services
  • Communication guides for impact-based warnings
11核心问题

专家提出的问题。

The questions follow information from forecast to action.

  • How skilful are forecasts at the lead times that matter for a given action?
  • Who has the legal mandate to issue a warning, and does everyone know who that is?
  • Do warnings describe likely impacts, not only weather, and say what to do?
  • Do they reach everyone at risk, including people without phones, in other languages or with disabilities?
  • What happens when a warning turns out to be a false alarm or a miss?
12机制

机制与驱动因素。

Forecast skill declines with lead time and varies by hazard: large-scale storms can be forecast days ahead, while intense local downpours are hard to pin down even hours before. Seasonal forecasts give probabilities, not certainties. Impact-based warnings combine hazard forecasts with exposure and vulnerability to describe what the weather will do, which people find easier to act on.

Warnings fail most often in the last mile: unclear authority, conflicting messages, messages that do not reach people, or advice that is impossible to follow. Trust is built over time, and repeated false alarms or missed events erode it. A single authoritative voice, consistent messages and clear actions are widely recognised as essential.

13方法与数据

如何研究,以及方法止于何处。

方法或数据显示内容局限
预报检验Skill, reliability and bias at given lead timesRare extremes give few cases for verification
Warning chain and stakeholder mappingWho issues, relays and acts on warningsFormal arrangements may differ from practice
Post-event reviewsWhether warnings were received, understood and acted onRely on recall and partial data
Social and behavioural researchWhy people do or do not actFindings are context-specific
14方法

如何研究,以及方法无法说明的内容。

  1. 预测与时间序列分析集合预报解读 · 季节展望的应用 · 预报检验在此应用
  2. 气候与大气科学变化的检测与归因 · 极端事件归因 · 基于过程的模型评估在此应用
  3. 高性能计算、云计算与边缘计算集合的运行与存储 · 贴近数据的分析 · 观测的边缘处理在此应用
  4. 空间系统与卫星服务观测连续性规划 · 用于预警的卫星通信在此应用
15Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

阅读本页时所对照的机构和文件。状态和版本会变化;每个链接都指向发布机构。

16问题

问题与解答。

What is an impact-based forecast?
A forecast or warning that describes the expected effects of a hazard on people and assets, such as flooded roads, rather than only meteorological values.
What is the Common Alerting Protocol?
An international data standard for public warnings, maintained by OASIS and adopted by ITU, that lets one warning be sent consistently across many channels.
Who issues weather warnings?
The national meteorological and hydrological service or another authority designated by law. Other sources should point people to those authority warnings.
Why do warnings need a single authoritative voice?
Because conflicting messages cause confusion and delay. Recognised warning authorities exist so that people know whose information to act on.
What is an impact-based warning?
A warning that describes the expected effects of a hazard, such as flooded roads or power cuts, and what people should do, rather than only the weather values.
Does Climate and Hazards issue warnings?
No. It studies how warning systems work and publishes research. Warnings come from competent national and local authorities.
报告贡献

从本页贡献证据。

报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRI气候与灾害全球系统风险与韧性观测站信号情景与压力测试
气候与灾害

带来一种方法、一个数据集或一个问题。

信息和咨询现已开放。每项咨询都会获得一个编号,并告知下一步;申请、付款、算力分配和注册只有在相应团队、条款和审查能力就绪时才会开放。