Skip to content

GCRI · Climate and Hazards

Climate services and warnings

Climate services turn observations, forecasts and projections into information people can use: daily forecasts, seasonal outlooks, warnings and climate guidance for sectors. A warning only works if it reaches people in time, in a form they understand, and if they know what to do. This page sets out how services and warning systems are organised, how forecasts are verified, and what evidence serves the services and authorities that run them.

01Canvas

How the work runs.

Systems · around this subjectIllustrative
Multi-hazard outlook: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Climate services and warnings.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.

Fig.Multi-hazard outlook: example names and illustrative values, not a record or a live system.

02The question

Climate services and warnings: how the risk develops.

Forecast-to-user pathways and authority. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Detection and forecasting

Observing networks, radar, satellites and numerical models detect developing hazards and forecast them. Lead time and skill vary by hazard, from days for cyclones to minutes for flash floods.

Mechanism

Impact-based warnings

Warnings that describe what the weather will do, such as roads flooding or buildings at risk, prompt more action than warnings that only give rainfall amounts or wind speeds.

Mechanism

The last mile

Warnings must reach everyone through broadcast, mobile alerts, sirens and community networks, in local languages and accessible formats. Gaps fall hardest on remote, poor and marginalised people.

Mechanism

Trust and response

People act on warnings they trust and understand. False alarms, unclear authority and conflicting messages erode trust, while drills and preparedness turn warnings into action.

03Geography

Hazards now worldwide.

Flood water, population density and active fires across the world, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

Hazards now, for this page

About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds leave gaps)
Source
VIIRS Global Flood Product (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite detection; clouds leave gaps. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University))
Provider
NASA SEDAC (CIESIN, Columbia University)
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Vintage
null; Census-based estimate, static (2020)
Resolution
about 1 km grid
Uncertainty
Census-based estimate of people per square kilometre in 2020, shown as exposure context; not a count of people affected by any hazard.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed (clouds and overpass timing leave gaps)
Source
VIIRS NOAA-20 375 m (FIRMS) (NASA LANCE FIRMS)
Provider
NASA LANCE FIRMS
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite detection; clouds and overpass timing leave gaps
Newest at build
2026-10-13
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite hot-spot detections for the day shown, including gas flares and industrial heat; not a confirmed fire, an incident report or a warning.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Observed
Source
VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance (NASA LANCE)
Provider
NASA LANCE
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite image
Newest at build
2026-10-14
Resolution
about 250 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite image. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Estimated
Source
GPM IMERG (NASA GES DISC)
Provider
NASA GES DISC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
daily; Satellite estimate, near real time
Newest at build
2026-10-12
Resolution
about 2 km grid
Uncertainty
Satellite estimate, near real time. Satellite or model raster as the provider publishes it. Clouds, swath gaps and retrieval error leave gaps and noise; values are indicators, not measurements at a place.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map
About this layer
Evidence
Modelled (latest year GIBS publishes)
Source
MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1) (NASA LP DAAC)
Provider
NASA LP DAAC
Licence
NASA open data
Vintage
yearly; Satellite classification; latest year GIBS publishes
Newest at build
2024-01-01
Resolution
about 500 m grid
Uncertainty
Satellite land cover classes for the year shown, including croplands; a classification with known errors, not a farm register.
Reached through
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov, only after you allow the live map

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

Hazards now, framed on the world.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · U.S. Geological Survey · NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERTSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS), VIIRS 375 m active fire product, NASA LANCE; vector tiles via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • GPM IMERG precipitation, NASA Precipitation Processing System; distributed by the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
  • Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Live: U.S. Geological Survey Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Observed (EO): NASA JPL OPERA DIST-ALERT (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • River discharge forecast, 30 days with range (GloFAS via Open-Meteo): Contains modified Copernicus Emergency Management Service information 2026; not a flood warning.
  • Weather data by Open-Meteo.com (https://open-meteo.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
  • Optional layers (20 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Flood water, 3-day composite: VIIRS Global Flood Product, NASA LANCE · 14 Oct 2026
  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Active fires and thermal anomalies: VIIRS NOAA-20 375 m (FIRMS), NASA LANCE FIRMS · 13 Oct 2026
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Precipitation rate, daily mean: GPM IMERG, NASA GES DISC · 12 Oct 2026
  • Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024

04Across the domains

Climate services are useful only when each domain can act on them.

Service evaluations are designed for the Evidence Brief series. The Global Framework for Climate Services and Early Warnings for All frame the work; warnings use the Common Alerting Protocol and are issued only by mandated agencies.

  • User evaluations of climate services.
  • Records of how a warning was received and acted on.
05Simulator

Stocks, flows, delays and a tipping threshold.

Two stocks, pressure and adaptive capacity, joined by a reinforcing growth loop, a delayed balancing response and damage when pressure outruns capacity; past the threshold the system can tip. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction.

Controls

Growth of pressure
6.0% a year
Efficacy of capacity in reducing pressure
4.0% a year
Investment response to perceived pressure
20%
Perception delay
4.0 years
Tipping threshold of pressure
60 index
Amplification past the threshold
2.0 times
Years simulated
50 years

Readouts

Peak pressure
113 index
Capacity at the end
186 index
Years over the threshold
15.8 years
Numbers, methods and sources
YearPressureCapacityPerceived
020.050.020.0
423.344.921.2
827.242.224.0
1231.742.327.7
1636.845.532.2
2042.351.537.2
2447.960.342.6
2853.271.348.0
3257.884.353.1
3666.498.458.4
4082.7115.969.7
4497.8139.783.8
48109.1169.497.3

Methods

  1. System dynamics Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
  2. Critical transitions and tipping points Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
  3. Causal loop diagram Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
  4. Uncertainty fan (parameter Monte Carlo) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  5. One-at-a-time sensitivity (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

Stocks, flows, delays and a tipping threshold. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: System dynamics (Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics); Critical transitions and tipping points (Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461); Causal loop diagram (Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill).
06Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Forecast skillcontinuous ranked probability skill score against a referenceper verification cycleForecast verificationOBSERVED
Warning lead timehours between warning issue and hazard onsetper eventWarning logs and event recordsOBSERVED
Population covered by multi-hazard early warningpercent of populationannualSendai Framework Monitor target GPublished statistics
Warnings in Common Alerting Protocolpercent of warnings issued in CAPannualAlert feeds and WMO Register of Alerting AuthoritiesOBSERVED
False alarm ratioratio of warnings without the hazardper verification cycleWarning verificationOBSERVED
People who received and acted on a warningpercent of surveyed populationper surveyPost-event surveysREPORTED
07Twin and cascade simulator

Model climate services and warnings as a system. Run the cascade.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Climate risk standards: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

  • Sea-level rise
  • Coastal flood (set off downstream)
  • Storm surge (set off downstream)
  • High-tide flooding (set off downstream)
  • Coastal erosion (set off downstream)
  • Saltwater intrusion (set off downstream)
  • Estuary flood (set off downstream)
  • Coastal habitat squeeze (set off downstream)
  • Wetland loss (set off downstream)
  • Mangrove loss (set off downstream)
  • Groundwater flood (set off downstream)
  • Climate-driven migration and relocation (set off downstream)
  • Mass displacement (set off downstream)

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-1 The UNI and the artefact catalogue (grammar v0.2: domain, sector, region and environment segments)
  • NS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)
  • NS-3b Dataset and product metadata profile (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O)
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NS-14 Conformance and crosswalk to external standards
  • NRS-H65 Hazard family: Planetary boundary transgressions (NHS-1 planet.boundary)
  • NRS-H62 Hazard family: Compound and multi-hazard events (NHS-1 sys.compound)
  • NRS-H71 Hazard family: Deep-time and cosmic catastrophes (NHS-1 planet.deep-time)
  • NRS-H79 Hazard family: Mental health crises (NHS-1 health.mental)
  • NRS-H75 Hazard family: Climate-sensitive illness (NHS-1 health.climate-sensitive)
  • NRS-H7 Hazard family: Large-scale circulation anomalies (NHS-1 atmo.climate-mode)

Observation

  • ERA5 reanalysis (Copernicus Climate Data Store) (listed for reference)
  • CMIP6 climate projections (Copernicus Climate Data Store) (listed for reference)
  • NGFS Scenario Explorer (listed for reference)
  • INFORM Risk Index (listed for reference)
  • Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population
  • Total greenhouse gas emissions per year
  • Direct economic loss attributed to disasters in relation to global GDP

Example geography

  • Pacific Island states: 150 hexagonal cells
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
  • Vegetation disturbance alerts, 30 m (OPERA DIST-ALERT), NASA GIBS
08Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
WMO State of Climate Services reportsStatus of climate services capacity by country and sectorPublic, WMO terms of use
Sendai Framework Monitor, target GNational reporting on early warning coverage and risk informationPublic, UN terms of use
WMO Register of Alerting AuthoritiesAlerting authorities and their CAP feedsPublic, WMO terms
Early Warnings for All initiative reportsProgress on the four pillars of early warningPublic, terms per publishing agency
Copernicus Emergency Management Service early warning systemsEuropean and global flood, drought and fire forecastsFree, Copernicus terms
09Methods and evidence

How climate services and warnings is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

Uncertainty bands

How far the outlook for climate services and warnings could spread, shown as ranges rather than a single line.

Now+5+10+15+20+25+30 yhighlowvery likely rangelikely range
Central estimate
median of the ensemble
Ranges
likely and very likely, in IPCC calibrated language
Ensemble
members, scenarios and initial conditions stated
Read with
the sensitivity of the result to each input
Illustrative ensemble spread on an index scale; the form follows IPCC uncertainty guidance. Not a projection.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
10Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Climate and Hazards prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
National meteorological and hydrological servicesWhere to invest in observing, forecasting and warning capacityVerification results; service maturity profiles
Civil protection authoritiesHow warnings translate into protective action and evacuationWarning chain reviews; post-event surveys
Telecommunications regulatorsHow mobile networks carry public alertsWarning dissemination coverage; CAP adoption
Development partnersWhich early warning gaps to supportEarly Warnings for All pillar assessments

Outputs this topic produces

  • Verification summaries of forecast and warning performance
  • Warning chain reviews from detection to community response
  • Service maturity profiles against the Global Framework for Climate Services
  • Communication guides for impact-based warnings
11Core questions

What experts ask.

The questions follow information from forecast to action.

  • How skilful are forecasts at the lead times that matter for a given action?
  • Who has the legal mandate to issue a warning, and does everyone know who that is?
  • Do warnings describe likely impacts, not only weather, and say what to do?
  • Do they reach everyone at risk, including people without phones, in other languages or with disabilities?
  • What happens when a warning turns out to be a false alarm or a miss?
12Mechanisms

Mechanisms and drivers.

Forecast skill declines with lead time and varies by hazard: large-scale storms can be forecast days ahead, while intense local downpours are hard to pin down even hours before. Seasonal forecasts give probabilities, not certainties. Impact-based warnings combine hazard forecasts with exposure and vulnerability to describe what the weather will do, which people find easier to act on.

Warnings fail most often in the last mile: unclear authority, conflicting messages, messages that do not reach people, or advice that is impossible to follow. Trust is built over time, and repeated false alarms or missed events erode it. A single authoritative voice, consistent messages and clear actions are widely recognised as essential.

13Methods and data

How it is studied, and where the methods stop.

Method or dataWhat it showsLimits
Forecast verificationSkill, reliability and bias at given lead timesRare extremes give few cases for verification
Warning chain and stakeholder mappingWho issues, relays and acts on warningsFormal arrangements may differ from practice
Post-event reviewsWhether warnings were received, understood and acted onRely on recall and partial data
Social and behavioural researchWhy people do or do not actFindings are context-specific
14Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

15Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

16Questions

Questions and answers.

What is an impact-based forecast?
A forecast or warning that describes the expected effects of a hazard on people and assets, such as flooded roads, rather than only meteorological values.
What is the Common Alerting Protocol?
An international data standard for public warnings, maintained by OASIS and adopted by ITU, that lets one warning be sent consistently across many channels.
Who issues weather warnings?
The national meteorological and hydrological service or another authority designated by law. Other sources should point people to those authority warnings.
Why do warnings need a single authoritative voice?
Because conflicting messages cause confusion and delay. Recognised warning authorities exist so that people know whose information to act on.
What is an impact-based warning?
A warning that describes the expected effects of a hazard, such as flooded roads or power cuts, and what people should do, rather than only the weather values.
Does Climate and Hazards issue warnings?
No. It studies how warning systems work and publishes research. Warnings come from competent national and local authorities.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIClimate and HazardsGlobal Systems Risk and ResilienceObservatory SignalScenario and Stress-Test
Climate and Hazards

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.