Seasonal production outlooks
Seasonal climate forecasts and current crop condition are combined in statistical or crop models to give the probability of below-normal production by region, updated as the season progresses.
GCRI · Food Nexus
Forecasting gives food systems lead time: seasonal production outlooks, projections of lean-season food insecurity, staple price outlooks and pest alerts. Its value lies in the lead time it gives and the skill it can demonstrate on past seasons, not in point predictions.
Forecasting and time-series analysis predict future values of variables from past observations and explanatory information. They support early warning and planning across hazards, markets and health. In food and agriculture, trade, resources and supply chains and climate and hazards, forecasts trigger early action and anticipatory finance before shocks materialise. Probabilistic forecasts allow decisions to account for uncertainty across connected systems. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.
Seasonal climate forecasts and current crop condition are combined in statistical or crop models to give the probability of below-normal production by region, updated as the season progresses.
Time-series and structural models project staple prices in monitored markets from world prices, exchange rates, harvests and seasonality, with forecast intervals that widen with lead time.
Thresholds on forecast indicators are set and tested on past seasons, so agencies know the expected hits and false alarms before committing finance.
Crop greenness, rain, flood water and true-colour imagery over the Black Sea region, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 4
Growing conditions, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
Growing conditions, framed on the Black Sea region.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.
Layers and dates
Datasets and records used by forecasting and time-series analysis on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.
| Data | Role | Label |
|---|---|---|
| Seasonal climate forecasts (Copernicus C3S, NMME) | Forcing for outlooks | FORECAST |
| Market price time series | Price model training | Published statistics |
| Crop condition indicators | In-season predictors | OBSERVED |
| Past IPC and FEWS NET classifications | Verification of food insecurity projections | Published statistics |
A loss of output in one sector propagates through the technical coefficients to its suppliers and customers, and recovers at the rate you set; the coefficients are teaching values, not national accounts. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction. The map on this page shows The Black Sea region; the model itself is not tied to a place.
Controls
Readouts
| Sector | Peak inoperability (%) | Output weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Farming | 30.44 | 11.7 |
| Fertiliser and inputs | 1.68 | 17.1 |
| Food processing | 2.34 | 19.0 |
| Transport | 3.39 | 12.3 |
| Wholesale and retail | 0.66 | 27.4 |
| Energy | 2.88 | 12.5 |
The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page's map can draw:
Across the six pillars, led by Nexus Consortium
Forecasts are evaluated out of sample with proper scoring rules and reliability diagrams. Rolling-origin evaluation tests performance over time.
| Check | How it is done |
|---|---|
| Hindcast verification | Skill is measured on past forecasts by lead time, region and season |
| Reliability and sharpness | Probabilities are checked for calibration as well as for resolution |
| Rolling-origin evaluation | Models are re-trained and tested through time to expose structural breaks |
| Trigger performance record | Hits, misses and false alarms are published for every trigger |
Structural breaks and regime changes undermine models trained on the past. Forecast skill typically declines rapidly with lead time.
Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile FAO and food security: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.
Hazards
Systems and couplings
Controls
NS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)NS-10 Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations: definition, binding, evaluation and enforcement)NRS-N3 Food and agriculture risk and resilienceNRS-C7 Early warning, triggers and anticipatory actionNRS-H61 Hazard family: Cascading failure (NHS-1 sys.cascade)NRS-K40 Domain pack profile: Islands small states (DOMAIN-040)NRS-S9 System profile: NXS-AAP (Anticipatory action and triggers)NRS-H57 Hazard family: Humanitarian crises (NHS-1 soc.humanitarian)Observation
Example geography
The sectors forecasting for food security touches and how strongly they depend on each other: what a study has to observe and model together.
Signature
Food and its partners
Food gives nutrition to health (0.7), land conversion to biodiversity (0.6) and withdrawals and runoff to water (0.3).
W · E · I · F · H · B
Climate and Hazards stewards forecasting and time-series analysis for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.
The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.
The couplings between the systems in forecasting for food security: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information. We run no advertising. You can review your choices at any time through Privacy choices at the foot of every page.