GCRI · Registry

Keamanan siber untuk registri

Cybersecurity and cryptography protect a registry’s integrity: that records are not altered without trace, that only authorised people change them, and that what a reader receives is what the issuer published. In registries the main threat is often quiet tampering rather than outage, so integrity and audit matter as much as availability.

02Permohonan

What cybersecurity and cryptography does here.

Cybersecurity and cryptography protect information sistem and data from unauthorised access, disruption and manipulation. They address threats that can spread rapidly across interconnected digital and physical systems. In governance and institutions and research and evidence, cybersecurity analysis identifies how a single compromise can propagate across sectors that share software, vendors or networks. It informs resilience requirements and cyber insurance. The canonical description is on STEM Commons.

Tamper-evident record history

Each version of a record is hashed and the hashes are chained or anchored in an append-only log, so any later change to history is detectable by anyone holding an earlier hash.

Signed exports and releases

Exports and data releases are signed with keys whose public halves are published, so consumers can verify origin and integrity before ingesting, and a compromised mirror cannot pass off altered content.

Threat modelling of edit paths

Every route by which a record can change, from the interface and bulk import to administrator tools and pipelines, is modelled for abuse, including insiders and stolen credentials, and each route is logged.

03Pantau

Security assessment.

Layar yang akan digunakan sebuah tim untuk mengikuti metode ini: ukuran, status, dan keputusannya. Nama adalah contoh dan nilai bersifat ilustratif.

Security assessment

Registry · Cybersecurity for registries · Run R-3129

Two high findingsGCRI · Registri

Temuan

Weak key rotationIdentity serviceTinggiPR.AABuka
Unpatched gatewayEdgeTinggiPR.PSFixing
Logging gapAPI pembayaranSedangDE.CMBuka
Stale accountsDirektoriRendahPR.AADitutup

Kartu metode

Metode
Keamanan siber dan kriptografi
Kerangka
Fungsi CSF 2.0
Lingkup
37 assets
Label
DIMODELKAN

Control coverage by function

Security assessment: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Registry.Nama contoh dan nilai ilustratif; sebuah rancangan, bukan catatan atau sistem yang aktif.
04Data

Apa yang digunakan metode ini.

Datasets and records used by cybersecurity and cryptography on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in register sumber.

DataPeranLabel
Security event and audit logsDetection and reconstruction of changesTERAMATI
Content hashes and transparency logsIntegrity verification of records and releasesTERAMATI
Vulnerability databases such as CVE and OSVKnown weaknesses in registry software dependenciesDILAPORKAN
Incident reportsLessons from past compromises and near missesDILAPORKAN
05Simulator

Efek berantai melalui jaringan yang saling bergantung.

A Jejak bahaya melumpuhkan aset yang berada di lokasi sama pada setiap lapisan; fragmentasi, ketergantungan antarlapisan, dan kelebihan beban pada yang selamat kemudian menyebarkan kegagalan. Tampilan 3D memisahkan lapisan menurut kedalaman. Model pengajaran dengan nilai ilustratif yang dinyatakan, bukan prediksi.

Kendali

Aset per lapisan
18
Jejak bahaya
8% dari luas wilayah
Aset yang bergantung pada lapisan lain
60%
Kapasitas cadangan (toleransi)
30%

Pembacaan

Aset yang terdampak bahaya
6%
Aset yang masih berfungsi
48%
Penguatan kerusakan awal
9.3 times
Langkah menuju stabil
3
Angka, metode, dan sumber
LangkahDaya berfungsi (%)Water working (%)Telekomunikasi berfungsi (%)
010010083
16110056
2615639
3614439

Metode

  1. Jaringan yang saling bergantung Buldyrev dan lainnya (2010), Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464
  2. Rambatan kelebihan beban Motter and Lai (2002), Physical Review E 66
  3. Beban keantaraan Brandes (2001), Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25
  4. Jaringan multilapis Kivela and others (2014), Journal of Complex Networks 2
  5. Saling ketergantungan infrastruktur Rinaldi, Peerenboom and Kelly (2001), IEEE Control Systems 21(6)
  6. Kipas ketidakpastian (Monte Carlo parameter) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  7. Sensitivitas satu per satu (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Jalan utama Natural Earth
  • Jalur kereta api Natural Earth
  • Pelabuhan laut Natural Earth
  • Bandar udara Natural Earth
  • Luasan perkotaan Natural Earth
  • Cahaya malam hari ini, pemadaman (VIIRS Day/Night Band) NASA/NOAA VIIRS (Suomi NPP) · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • Peristiwa alam (NASA EONET) NASA EONET · register nasa.eonet.events
Efek berantai (kaskade) melalui jaringan yang saling bergantung. Model pengajaran ilustratif: model ini berjalan pada nilai yang ditetapkan oleh kontrol, bukan pada data terukur. Metode: Jaringan yang saling bergantung (Buldyrev dan lainnya (2010), Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464); Kaskade kelebihan beban (Motter dan Lai (2002), Physical Review E 66); Beban keantaraan (Brandes (2001), Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25).

Di seluruh enam pilar, dipimpin oleh Nexus Consortium

06Validasi

Cara hasil diperiksa.

Controls are tested through red-team exercises, audits and formal analysis of cryptographic schemes. Incident data are used to check whether defences performed as intended.

PemeriksaanCara pelaksanaannya
Hash verificationPublished records and exports are re-hashed on a schedule and compared with the logged values
Access reviewAccounts with edit and administrator rights are reviewed against current roles, and stale access is removed
Penetration testingEdit paths and interfaces are tested by an independent team against the threat model
Restore drillsBackups are restored to a clean environment and compared with the live registry

Adversaries adapt, so historical data may not reflect future attacks. Software supply chains and legacy systems introduce weaknesses that are hard to inventory.

07Metode dan bukti

How cybersecurity for registries is modelled, measured and tested.

Model, asumsi, data, dan ketidakpastiannya, dalam bentuk yang akan diperiksa ilmuwan atau insinyur. Strukturnya mengikuti metode yang dipublikasikan. Nilai yang digambar bersifat ilustratif, bukan temuan.

Set data dan asal-usul

The data classes behind cybersecurity for registries and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Kelas dataAsal-usul tercatatResolusi dinyatakanLisensi diperiksa
Citra satelit, optik dan radarsensor, tingkat pemrosesan, tanggal akuisisiukuran piksel dan kunjungan ulangper adegan
Reanalisis dan keluaran model iklimmodel, eksperimen, anggota, versigrid dan langkah waktuper rilis
Sensor dan alat ukur in situstasiun, instrumen, catatan kalibrasititik dan laju pengambilan sampelper jaringan
Keterpaparan penduduk dan asetmetode, tahun terbit, sumber masukanukuran sel dan satuanper rilis
Batas dan geografi acuanprodusen, edisi, tanggalskalaper edisi
Garis keturunan
Catatan W3C PROV dari sumber hingga gambar
Prinsip
FAIR: dapat ditemukan, dapat diakses, interoperabel, dapat digunakan ulang
Kesenjangan
ditampilkan sebagai hilang, tidak pernah diisi diam-diam
Kelas data dan bidang asal-usul yang dicatat untuk masing-masing; sebuah set data hanya dicantumkan namanya setelah lisensinya mengizinkan penggunaan tersebut.
Prinsip panduan FAIR · GO FAIR dan FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumPanduan penanganan ketidakpastian secara konsisten · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
09Pengelolaan

Siapa yang memelihara metode ini.

Keamanan Siber dan Ketahanan Digital stewards cybersecurity and cryptography for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Pertanyaan

Tanya jawab.

What are the limits of cybersecurity and cryptography in this field?
Adversaries adapt, so historical data may not reflect future attacks. Software supply chains and legacy systems introduce weaknesses that are hard to inventory.
Bagaimana hasil diperiksa?
Controls are tested through red-team exercises, audits and formal analysis of cryptographic schemes. Incident data are used to check whether defences performed as intended.
Apakah nilai di halaman ini nyata?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Di mana lagi metode ini diterapkan?
Observatory Halaman metode kanonis mencantumkan setiap platform yang menerapkannya.
LaporanBerkontribusi

Kontribusikan bukti dari halaman ini.

Laporan is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIRegistriMetode dan Teknis
Registri

Bawa metode, dataset, atau pertanyaan.

Informasi dan pertanyaan sudah terbuka hari ini. Sebuah pertanyaan menerima nomor referensi dan menyebutkan langkah berikutnya; lamaran, pembayaran, alokasi komputasi, dan pendaftaran hanya dibuka ketika tim, ketentuan, dan kapasitas tinjauannya tersedia.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.