GCRI · Registry

Hak dan pengungkapan

Every record carries rights: who owns the content, under what licence it may be reused, who may see it and when it may be withdrawn. Openness serves verification and reuse, but some records hold personal, sensitive, culturally protected or commercially restricted information. This page sets out how licences, access classes, embargoes and withdrawals are recorded, where they conflict, and what rights holders and reviewers need before a record is disclosed to a wider audience.

02Pertanyaannya

Rights and disclosure: how the risk develops.

Publication rights, withdrawal and audience. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mekanisme

Licence ambiguity

A record has no licence, a licence in prose only, or one licence on the landing page and another in the metadata. Careful reusers avoid it, careless ones reuse it wrongly, and holders cannot enforce terms that were never stated clearly.

Mekanisme

Audience leakage

A record meant for a programme team is exported, cached or indexed alongside public ones. Restricted fields appear in search results or partner copies, and once harvested the disclosure cannot be reversed.

Mekanisme

Embargo slippage

Embargo end dates can be recorded without being enforced, or enforced without being recorded. Content is then released early against agreements, or stays closed long after obligations end, defeating the openness that funders require.

Mekanisme

Withdrawal against the record

A rights holder asks for removal while the scholarly record calls for persistence. Erasure rights, takedown notices and retraction norms pull in different directions, and an unrecorded removal leaves citations pointing at nothing.

03Pantau

Interoperability console.

Layar yang akan digunakan sebuah tim untuk mengikuti subjek ini: ukuran, status, dan keputusannya. Nama adalah contoh dan nilai bersifat ilustratif.

Interoperability console

Rights and disclosure · Crosswalk · Profile v2

Test suite runningGCRI · Registri

Field mappings

identifieridcopyLintasan
evidence_labelquality.labelenum mapLintasan
licencerights.licenceSPDX idAmbiguous
versionversionsemverLintasan

Kesesuaian

Required fields97 of 100 requiredControlled terms97 of 95 requiredRound trip83 of 95 required
Interoperability console: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Rights and disclosure.Nama contoh dan nilai ilustratif; sebuah rancangan, bukan catatan atau sistem yang aktif.
04In the five domains

Rights decide what each domain’s data may be used for.

05Simulator

Stok, aliran, jeda, dan ambang titik balik.

Dua stok, tekanan dan kapasitas adaptif, dihubungkan oleh lingkar pertumbuhan yang saling menguatkan, respons penyeimbang yang tertunda, dan kerusakan ketika tekanan melampaui kapasitas; melewati ambang, sistem dapat berbalik. Model pengajaran dengan nilai ilustratif yang dinyatakan, bukan prediksi.

Kendali

Pertumbuhan tekanan
6,0% per tahun
Efektivitas kapasitas dalam menurunkan tekanan
4,0% per tahun
Respons investasi terhadap tekanan yang dirasakan
20%
Jeda persepsi
4.0 tahun
Ambang titik balik tekanan
indeks 60
Penguatan setelah melewati ambang
2.0 kali
Tahun yang disimulasikan
50 tahun

Pembacaan

Tekanan puncak
113 indeks
Kapasitas di akhir
indeks 186
Tahun di atas ambang
15.8 tahun
Angka, metode, dan sumber
TahunTekananKapasitasDirasakan
020.050.020.0
423.344.921.2
827.242.224.0
1231.742.327.7
1636.845.532.2
2042.351.537.2
2447.960.342.6
2853.271.348.0
3257.884.353.1
3666.498.458.4
4082.7115.969.7
4497.8139.783.8
48109.1169.497.3

Metode

  1. Dinamika sistem Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
  2. Transisi kritis dan titik balik Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
  3. Diagram lingkaran kausal Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
  4. Kipas ketidakpastian (Monte Carlo parameter) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  5. Sensitivitas satu per satu (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

Stok, aliran, tundaan, dan ambang titik kritis. Model pengajaran ilustratif: model ini berjalan pada nilai yang ditetapkan oleh kontrol, bukan pada data terukur. Metode: Dinamika sistem (Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics); Transisi kritis dan titik kritis (Scheffer dan lainnya (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461); Diagram lingkar kausal (Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill).

Di seluruh enam pilar, dipimpin oleh Nexus Consortium

06Indikator

Apa yang diukur, dan seberapa baik.

Setiap indikator membawa satuan, frekuensi, jenis sumber di baliknya, dan label bukti yang akan dibawa suatu nilai. Tidak ada nilai yang ditampilkan: sebuah program menyediakannya berdasarkan wewenangnya sendiri.

IndikatorUnitKadensiJenis sumberLabel
Records with a machine-readable licenceshare of recordssetiap bulanLicence metadataTERAMATI
Records with an access classshare of recordssetiap bulanSchema validationTERAMATI
Licence conflicts between metadata and landing pagejumlahsetiap kuartalSampled comparisonTERAMATI
Embargoes past their end date and unreleasedjumlahsetiap mingguEmbargo registerTERAMATI
Withdrawal and takedown requestscount by stated groundsetiap kuartalCase recordsREPORTED
Time to act on a takedown requesthariper caseCase recordsTERAMATI
Disclosure reviews completed before wider releaseshare of releasessetiap bulanReview recordsTERAMATI
07Metode dan bukti

How rights and disclosure is modelled, measured and tested.

Model, asumsi, data, dan ketidakpastiannya, dalam bentuk yang akan diperiksa ilmuwan atau insinyur. Strukturnya mengikuti metode yang dipublikasikan. Nilai yang digambar bersifat ilustratif, bukan temuan.

Set data dan asal-usul

The data classes behind rights and disclosure and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Kelas dataAsal-usul tercatatResolusi dinyatakanLisensi diperiksa
Citra satelit, optik dan radarsensor, tingkat pemrosesan, tanggal akuisisiukuran piksel dan kunjungan ulangper adegan
Reanalisis dan keluaran model iklimmodel, eksperimen, anggota, versigrid dan langkah waktuper rilis
Sensor dan alat ukur in situstasiun, instrumen, catatan kalibrasititik dan laju pengambilan sampelper jaringan
Keterpaparan penduduk dan asetmetode, tahun terbit, sumber masukanukuran sel dan satuanper rilis
Batas dan geografi acuanprodusen, edisi, tanggalskalaper edisi
Garis keturunan
Catatan W3C PROV dari sumber hingga gambar
Prinsip
FAIR: dapat ditemukan, dapat diakses, interoperabel, dapat digunakan ulang
Kesenjangan
ditampilkan sebagai hilang, tidak pernah diisi diam-diam
Kelas data dan bidang asal-usul yang dicatat untuk masing-masing; sebuah set data hanya dicantumkan namanya setelah lisensinya mengizinkan penggunaan tersebut.
Prinsip panduan FAIR · GO FAIR dan FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumPanduan penanganan ketidakpastian secara konsisten · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
08Sumber

Asal bukti.

Set data publik bernama dan catatan kelembagaan, masing-masing dengan kelas lisensinya. Sumber berdasarkan perjanjian hanya digunakan sesuai ketentuannya dan tidak pernah diterbitkan ulang.

SumberApa yang diberikannyaKelas lisensi
Creative Commons licence suiteStandard licences with machine-readable identifiers for reuse termsLicence texts free to use
Daftar Lisensi SPDXStandard short identifiers for software and data licencesOpen data, free to reuse
RightsStatements.orgStandard statements of copyright and reuse status for cultural and research objectsOpen, free to apply
Local Contexts HubTraditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices attached to recordsFree to use under Local Contexts terms
Sherpa RomeoPublisher and journal policies on self-archiving and embargoesFree to search, Jisc terms
W3C ODRL Information ModelA vocabulary for permissions, prohibitions and duties in machine-readable formW3C document licence, free to implement
cOAlition S Journal Checker ToolRoutes to compliance with funder open access requirementsFree to use
09Keputusan

Siapa yang memutuskan, dan apa yang dilayani bukti.

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Siapa yang memutuskanPertanyaannyaBukti yang dilayani halaman ini
Rights holders and authorsUnder which licence and to which audience a record may be releasedFunder requirements, publisher policies and the record’s sensitive fields
Data protection officersWhether personal data in a record may be disclosed, restricted or erasedAccess class, lawful basis, retention and the public interest in a persistent record
Indigenous data governance bodiesWhether and how community data or knowledge may be sharedCARE principles, Local Contexts labels and the community’s recorded terms
Platform publishers and repository managersWhether to act on a takedown or withdrawal requestThe request’s grounds, the rights record and the policy for leaving a tombstone

Keluaran yang dihasilkan topik ini

  • Rights panels showing licence, rights holder, access class and embargo for every record
  • A disclosure review step before any record moves to a wider audience
  • A withdrawal and takedown route with its grounds and the tombstone it leaves
  • Machine-readable licence identifiers carried in every export
10Pertanyaan inti

What experts ask about disclosure.

  • Who holds the right to publish a record, and who can veto it?
  • How should audiences be defined when a record is useful but sensitive?
  • When does a public interest in disclosure outweigh a private interest in protection?
  • How is protected and Indigenous knowledge kept under its holders’ control?
  • What remains visible after a record is withdrawn?
11Mekanisme

Why disclosure decisions are hard.

Disclosure risk is cumulative. A record that is harmless alone can identify a person or a vulnerable site when combined with others, which is why statistical agencies apply disclosure control before releasing data. Rights are also layered: an author may hold copyright, a funder may require open access, a community may hold collective rights over traditional knowledge, and a data subject holds privacy rights that override both.

Research data communities summarise the aim as findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, while principles for Indigenous data governance add collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility and ethics. The Registry’s three classes, public, restricted and protected, are described on rights and visibility.

12Metode dan batasan

How rights are applied.

  1. 01

    Classification at entry

    Each record receives a visibility class and licence before release, decided by its owner within the law.

  2. 02

    Audience control

    Restricted records are visible only to people authorised for a purpose, enforced with access controls from keamanan siber dan kriptografi.

  3. 03

    Penarikan

    Withdrawal removes a record from public view; its identifier resolves to a notice with the date and any replacement.

  4. 04

    Batasan

    Nothing published can be fully recalled. Disclosure judgements involve values as well as rules, and re-identification risk changes as other data becomes available.

13Metode

Cara hal ini dikaji, dan apa yang tidak dapat dinyatakan metodenya.

  1. Keamanan siber dan kriptografiRiwayat catatan yang menunjukkan perubahan · Ekspor dan rilis yang ditandatangani · Pemodelan ancaman pada jalur penyuntinganDiterapkan di sini
  2. Identitas digital dan sistem digital publikAutentikasi dan kewenangan penerbit · Disambiguasi kontributor oleh yang bersangkutanDiterapkan di sini
  3. Rekayasa data, interoperabilitas, dan pengelolaan dataPenyerapan data tervalidasi skema · Rekonsiliasi pengenal persisten · Perekaman silsilah dalam alur pemrosesanDiterapkan di sini
14Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

Badan dan dokumen yang menjadi acuan halaman ini. Status dan edisi berubah; setiap tautan menuju badan penerbitnya.

15Pertanyaan

Tanya jawab.

Why is a record without a licence a problem?
Because by default most jurisdictions reserve all rights, so careful reusers cannot rely on it and careless ones reuse it anyway. A clear licence protects both the holder and the reuser.
What is left when a record is withdrawn?
A tombstone: the identifier, basic citation metadata and the reason for withdrawal where it can be stated. The content is removed or restricted, and citations still resolve to an explanation.
How do the CARE principles relate to open data?
They complement FAIR by asking who benefits and who decides. For Indigenous data, openness follows the community’s authority to control rather than being assumed by default.
Can a published record be made private again?
Its access class can be narrowed, but copies already harvested may persist elsewhere. That is why disclosure review happens before release, not after.
Can the Registry publish a record because it is in the public interest?
No. The Registry cannot make a record public on its own initiative. The record owner decides, within the law.
Where do privacy requests go?
Ke formulir permintaan privasi. Tanda terima memberikan nomor referensi dan menyebutkan langkah berikutnya.
Are restricted records listed publicly?
Their existence is disclosed only where the owner allows. Their content is never shown in public views.
LaporanBerkontribusi

Kontribusikan bukti dari halaman ini.

Laporan is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIRegistriMetode dan Teknis
Registri

Bawa metode, dataset, atau pertanyaan.

Informasi dan pertanyaan sudah terbuka hari ini. Sebuah pertanyaan menerima nomor referensi dan menyebutkan langkah berikutnya; lamaran, pembayaran, alokasi komputasi, dan pendaftaran hanya dibuka ketika tim, ketentuan, dan kapasitas tinjauannya tersedia.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.