GCRI · Registry

Catatan partisipasi

Participation records name the people and organisations involved in a programme or a work: contributors, participants, partners and reviewers. They carry recognition, but also obligations, because naming someone discloses something about them. This page sets out how consent is recorded and honoured, how contributions are credited with standard roles and identifiers, how programme boundaries are stated, and what happens when consent is withdrawn or attribution is disputed.

02Pertanyaannya

Participation records: how the risk develops.

Consent, recognition and programme boundaries. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mekanisme

Consent scope creep

Consent is given for one purpose, such as listing in a programme, and the record is later reused for another, such as publicity, analytics or a partner directory. Without the scope recorded beside the name, reuse quietly exceeds what the person agreed to.

Mekanisme

Identity collision

Two contributors with similar names are merged, or one person appears as several. Credit goes to the wrong person, a withdrawal request misses some records, and a disclosure meant for one person reaches another.

Mekanisme

Boundary blur

A partner named in one project is listed as a member of the whole programme, or an adviser appears as an endorser. Readers infer affiliation, endorsement or responsibility that no one agreed to.

Mekanisme

Withdrawal does not propagate

A person withdraws consent and the primary record is updated, but exports, caches, partner copies and search indexes still carry the name. The harm the withdrawal was meant to prevent continues downstream.

03Metode dan bukti

How participation records is modelled, measured and tested.

Model, asumsi, data, dan ketidakpastiannya, dalam bentuk yang akan diperiksa ilmuwan atau insinyur. Strukturnya mengikuti metode yang dipublikasikan. Nilai yang digambar bersifat ilustratif, bukan temuan.

Set data dan asal-usul

The data classes behind participation records and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Kelas dataAsal-usul tercatatResolusi dinyatakanLisensi diperiksa
Citra satelit, optik dan radarsensor, tingkat pemrosesan, tanggal akuisisiukuran piksel dan kunjungan ulangper adegan
Reanalisis dan keluaran model iklimmodel, eksperimen, anggota, versigrid dan langkah waktuper rilis
Sensor dan alat ukur in situstasiun, instrumen, catatan kalibrasititik dan laju pengambilan sampelper jaringan
Keterpaparan penduduk dan asetmetode, tahun terbit, sumber masukanukuran sel dan satuanper rilis
Batas dan geografi acuanprodusen, edisi, tanggalskalaper edisi
Garis keturunan
Catatan W3C PROV dari sumber hingga gambar
Prinsip
FAIR: dapat ditemukan, dapat diakses, interoperabel, dapat digunakan ulang
Kesenjangan
ditampilkan sebagai hilang, tidak pernah diisi diam-diam
Kelas data dan bidang asal-usul yang dicatat untuk masing-masing; sebuah set data hanya dicantumkan namanya setelah lisensinya mengizinkan penggunaan tersebut.
Prinsip panduan FAIR · GO FAIR dan FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumPanduan penanganan ketidakpastian secara konsisten · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
04In the five domains

Participation records show who took part in each domain’s work, and nothing more.

05Indikator

Apa yang diukur, dan seberapa baik.

Setiap indikator membawa satuan, frekuensi, jenis sumber di baliknya, dan label bukti yang akan dibawa suatu nilai. Tidak ada nilai yang ditampilkan: sebuah program menyediakannya berdasarkan wewenangnya sendiri.

IndikatorUnitKadensiJenis sumberLabel
Participation records with a current consent statusshare of records naming a personsetiap bulanConsent registerDINYATAKAN
Records with consent scope statedshare of records naming a personsetiap bulanSchema validationTERAMATI
Contributors with a persistent identifiershare of contributorssetiap bulanIdentifier linkageTERAMATI
Contributions described with CRediT rolesshare of contributionsper outputContributor metadataDINYATAKAN
Records with a stated programme boundaryshare of participation recordssetiap kuartalSchema validationTERAMATI
Withdrawal requests completed within the policy periodshare of requestssetiap kuartalCase recordsTERAMATI
Attribution disputes raisedjumlahsetiap kuartalIntegrity office recordsREPORTED
06Sumber

Asal bukti.

Set data publik bernama dan catatan kelembagaan, masing-masing dengan kelas lisensinya. Sumber berdasarkan perjanjian hanya digunakan sesuai ketentuannya dan tidak pernah diterbitkan ulang.

SumberApa yang diberikannyaKelas lisensi
CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104)Standard roles describing each contributor’s part in a research outputOpen standard, free to use
ORCID registryPersistent identifiers and consent-based connections between researchers and their recordsCC0 for the public data file
ROR (Research Organization Registry)Identifiers for partner organisations and their relationshipsCC0
W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV)Terms for purposes, legal bases, consent states and processing operationsW3C community licence, free to use
GA4GH Data Use OntologyMachine-readable terms for consent-based conditions on data useOpen ontology, attribution
ICMJE recommendationsCriteria for authorship and for acknowledging non-author contributorsFree to read
07Keputusan

Siapa yang memutuskan, dan apa yang dilayani bukti.

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Siapa yang memutuskanPertanyaannyaBukti yang dilayani halaman ini
Research ethics boardsWhether consent covers the proposed listing, reuse or disclosure of participantsRecorded consent scope, its date and the uses each record supports
Data protection officersWhether a lawful basis exists for processing and publishing personal data in a recordPurpose, legal basis, retention and withdrawal history for each record
Journal editors and research integrity officesHow to resolve an authorship or attribution disputeContributor roles, identifiers and the history of changes to the contributor list
Programme stewardsWho may be listed as a partner, member or contributor, and in what capacitySigned participation terms and the stated boundary of each role

Keluaran yang dihasilkan topik ini

  • Participation views showing each named party’s role, identifier and programme boundary
  • Consent status and scope recorded beside every personal name
  • A withdrawal route listing the records and known copies it reaches
  • Contributor role records using CRediT terms where they apply
08Pertanyaan inti

What experts ask about participation records.

  • What consent is needed before a person or institution is named, and how is it withdrawn?
  • How should roles be described so that credit is accurate and comparable?
  • How can recognition be given without creating a credential or an employment record?
  • How much personal data does a participation record need?
  • How are institutional names protected from implied endorsement?
09Mekanisme

Where participation records go wrong.

Contribution records fail in predictable ways. Gift and honorary authorship overstate some contributions, while data collectors, community researchers and technical staff are often left out. Lists of participating institutions are read as partnerships or endorsements. Records collected for one purpose are reused for another without consent. Research communities have responded with contributor-role taxonomies that describe what each person actually did, and with persistent identifiers that people control themselves.

Data protection law and research ethics add a further rule: collect only what the purpose requires. Methods from identitas digital dan sistem digital publik show how a person can be identified reliably while disclosing as little as possible.

10Metode dan batasan

How the Registry approaches it.

  1. 01

    Consent first

    A person or institution is named only as they agreed, for the purpose they agreed, and consent can be withdrawn.

  2. 02

    Described roles

    Roles follow a published vocabulary of contribution types, never titles that imply authority.

  3. 03

    Minimal data

    Records hold the least personal data needed, and protected details stay out of public views.

  4. 04

    Batasan

    A participation record is not a licence, a qualification, an appointment or an employment record. Self-reported roles can be inaccurate, and recognition norms differ between disciplines and cultures.

11Metode

Cara hal ini dikaji, dan apa yang tidak dapat dinyatakan metodenya.

  1. Identitas digital dan sistem digital publikAutentikasi dan kewenangan penerbit · Disambiguasi kontributor oleh yang bersangkutanDiterapkan di sini
  2. Rekayasa data, interoperabilitas, dan pengelolaan dataPenyerapan data tervalidasi skema · Rekonsiliasi pengenal persisten · Perekaman silsilah dalam alur pemrosesanDiterapkan di sini
  3. Keamanan siber dan kriptografiRiwayat catatan yang menunjukkan perubahan · Ekspor dan rilis yang ditandatangani · Pemodelan ancaman pada jalur penyuntinganDiterapkan di sini
12Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

Badan dan dokumen yang menjadi acuan halaman ini. Status dan edisi berubah; setiap tautan menuju badan penerbitnya.

13Pertanyaan

Tanya jawab.

Can I be listed without my consent?
A person should not be named in a public participation record without a lawful basis, usually consent. Where another basis applies, such as published authorship, that basis is recorded beside the name.
What happens when I withdraw consent?
The record is updated or removed under the programme’s terms, the withdrawal is logged without restating the withdrawn details, and known downstream recipients are notified.
Why use CRediT roles rather than a plain contributor list?
Because a list does not say who did what. Standard roles let credit and responsibility be read precisely, and they travel with the record into registration metadata.
Does being listed as a partner mean endorsement?
No. A partner record states a defined role within a stated boundary. It does not imply endorsement of the whole programme unless the partner has recorded one explicitly.
Does a participation record make me a member or an employee?
No. It records a consented contribution or role within a programme’s boundaries, and nothing more.
Can I ask to be removed?
Yes. You can withdraw consent to be named in public views. See rights and disclosure and the Registry’s rights page.
Is an institution named in a record a partner?
Only if a current agreement says so and the institution has given permission. A listing alone never implies partnership or endorsement.
LaporanBerkontribusi

Kontribusikan bukti dari halaman ini.

Laporan is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIRegistriMetode dan Teknis
Registri

Bawa metode, dataset, atau pertanyaan.

Informasi dan pertanyaan sudah terbuka hari ini. Sebuah pertanyaan menerima nomor referensi dan menyebutkan langkah berikutnya; lamaran, pembayaran, alokasi komputasi, dan pendaftaran hanya dibuka ketika tim, ketentuan, dan kapasitas tinjauannya tersedia.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.