Skip to content

GCRI · Registry

Cybersecurity for registries

Cybersecurity and cryptography protect a registry’s integrity: that records are not altered without trace, that only authorised people change them, and that what a reader receives is what the issuer published. In registries the main threat is often quiet tampering rather than outage, so integrity and audit matter as much as availability.

02Application

What cybersecurity and cryptography does here.

Cybersecurity and cryptography protect information pergalan and data from unauthorised access, disruption and manipulation. They address threats that can spread rapidly across interconnected digital and physical systems. In governance and institutions and research and evidence, cybersecurity analysis identifies how a single compromise can propagate across sectors that share software, vendors or networks. It informs resilience requirements and cyber insurance. The canonical description is on STEM Commons.

Tamper-evident record history

Each version of a record is hashed and the hashes are chained or anchored in an append-only log, so any later change to history is detectable by anyone holding an earlier hash.

Signed exports and releases

Exports and data releases are signed with keys whose public halves are published, so consumers can verify origin and integrity before ingesting, and a compromised mirror cannot pass off altered content.

Threat modelling of edit paths

Every route by which a record can change, from the interface and bulk import to administrator tools and pipelines, is modelled for abuse, including insiders and stolen credentials, and each route is logged.

03Çavdêrî bike

Security assessment.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Security assessment

Registry · Cybersecurity for registries · Run R-3129

Two high findingsGCRI · Registry

Encam

Weak key rotationIdentity serviceBilindPR.AAVekirî
Unpatched gatewayEdgeBilindPR.PSFixing
Logging gapAPI ya dayînêNavînDE.CMVekirî
Stale accountsRêberKêmPR.AAClosed

Method card

Rêbaz
Ewlehiya sîber û kriptografî
Framework
Fonksiyonên CSF 2.0
Çarçove
37 assets
Nîşan
MODELKIRÎ

Control coverage by function

Security assessment: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Registry.Nav û nirxên nimûneyî; sêwiran e, ne qeyd an pergaleke zindî ye.
04Dane

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by cybersecurity and cryptography on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DaneRolNîşan
Security event and audit logsDetection and reconstruction of changesÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ
Content hashes and transparency logsIntegrity verification of records and releasesÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ
Vulnerability databases such as CVE and OSVKnown weaknesses in registry software dependenciesREPORTED
Incident reportsLessons from past compromises and near missesREPORTED
05Simulator

Kaskadeyek di tevahiya torên girêdayî de.

A Şopa metirsîyê hebûnên li heman cihî di her qatê de ji holê radike; perçebûn, girêdayîbûna di navbera qatan de û barkirina zêde ya yên mayî paşê têkçûnê belav dikin. Dîmena 3D qatan bi kûrahiyê ji hev vediqetîne. Modela hînkirinê bi nirxên ronîker ên diyarkirî, ne pêşbînî.

Kontrol

Mal û milk her qat
18
Metirsî: şop
8% ya qadê
Mal û milkên ku bi qateke din ve girêdayî ne
60%
Kapasîteya zêde (tolerans)
30%

Xwendin

Mal û milkên ku metirsî bandor li wan kiriye
6%
Mal û milkên ku hê dixebitin
48%
Mezinbûna zerara destpêkê
9.3 times
Gavên çareserkirinê
3
Jimar, rêbaz û çavkanî
GavHêz dixebite (%)Water working (%)Têlekomunîkasyon dixebitin (%)
010010083
16110056
2615639
3614439

Rêbaz

  1. Torên girêdayî Buldyrev û yên din (2010), Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464
  2. Zincîra barkêşiya zêde Motter and Lai (2002), Physical Review E 66
  3. Barê navbeynkariyê Brandes (2001), Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25
  4. Torên pirqat Kivela and others (2014), Journal of Complex Networks 2
  5. Girêdayîbûnên binesazê Rinaldi, Peerenboom and Kelly (2001), IEEE Control Systems 21(6)
  6. Pankeya nediyarîyê (Monte Carlo ya parametreyan) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  7. Hesasiyeta yek-yek (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Dane

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Rêyên sereke Natural Earth
  • Rêhesin Natural Earth
  • Benderên behrê Natural Earth
  • Balafirgeh Natural Earth
  • Dirêjahiyên bajarî Natural Earth
  • Ronahiya şevê îşev, qutbûn (VIIRS Day/Night Band) NASA/NOAA VIIRS (Suomi NPP) · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • Bûyerên xwezayî (NASA EONET) NASA EONET · tomar nasa.eonet.events
Zincîra bandorê di torên girêdayî de. Modela fêrkirinê ya nimûneyî: ew li ser nirxên ku kontrol destnîşan dikin dimeşe, ne li ser daneyên pîvandî. Rêbaz: Torên girêdayî (Buldyrev and others (2010), Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464); Zincîra barkêşiya zêde (Motter and Lai (2002), Physical Review E 66); Barê navbeynkariyê (Brandes (2001), Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25).

Li seranserê şeş stûnan, bi pêşengiya Nexus Consortium

06Erêkirin

How results are checked.

Controls are tested through red-team exercises, audits and formal analysis of cryptographic schemes. Incident data are used to check whether defences performed as intended.

Kontrol bikinHow it is done
Hash verificationPublished records and exports are re-hashed on a schedule and compared with the logged values
Access reviewAccounts with edit and administrator rights are reviewed against current roles, and stale access is removed
Penetration testingEdit paths and interfaces are tested by an independent team against the threat model
Restore drillsBackups are restored to a clean environment and compared with the live registry

Adversaries adapt, so historical data may not reflect future attacks. Software supply chains and legacy systems introduce weaknesses that are hard to inventory.

07Rêbaz û delîl

How cybersecurity for registries is modelled, measured and tested.

Model, texmînên wî, daneyên wî û nediyariya wî, bi şeweyê ku zanyar an endezyar kontrol bike. Avahî rêbazên weşandî dişopînin. Nirxên hatine xêzkirin nimûneyî ne, ne encam in.

Daneset û çavkanî

The data classes behind cybersecurity for registries and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Çîna daneyêÇavkanî hatiye tomarkirinBiryar hatiye diyarkirinLîsans hatiye kontrolkirin
Wêneyên peykî, optîk û radarsensor, asta pêvajoyê, dîroka wergirtinêmezinahiya pîkselê û vegera çavdêriyêher dîmen
Vekolîna nû û derxistina modela avhewamodel, ceribandin, endam, guhertoyêtor û gava demêher weşan
Sensor û pîvanên cihê xwestasyon, amûr, tomara kalîbrasyonêxal û rêjeya nimûnegirtinêher tor
Rûbirûbûna nifûs û mal û milkanrêbaz, berhema salê, çavkaniyên têketinêmezinahiya şaneyê û yekeya wêher weşan
Sînor û erdnîgariya referansêhilberîner, çap, dîrokpîvanher çap
Xetên eslê daneyê
Qeyda W3C PROV ji çavkaniyê heta wêneyê
Prensîp
FAIR: dîtbar, gihîştbar, hevgirtî, ji nû ve bikaranîn
Valahî
wekî winda tê nîşandan, tu carî bi bêdengî nayê dagirtin
Çînên daneyê û qadên çavkaniyê yên ji bo her yekê têne tomarkirin; danehevek tenê bi nav tê lîstekirin dema ku lîsansa wê karanînê qebûl dike.
Prensîbên rêber ên FAIR · GO FAIR û FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumRêwerzên ji bo birêvebirina hevgirtî ya nediyarîyan · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
09Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Ewlehiya sîber û berxwedana dîjîtal stewards cybersecurity and cryptography for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Pirs

Pirs û bersiv.

What are the limits of cybersecurity and cryptography in this field?
Adversaries adapt, so historical data may not reflect future attacks. Software supply chains and legacy systems introduce weaknesses that are hard to inventory.
How are results checked?
Controls are tested through red-team exercises, audits and formal analysis of cryptographic schemes. Incident data are used to check whether defences performed as intended.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
Çavdêrxaneya canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkTevkarî bike

Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.

rêzeya Pergalên Stratejîk is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIRegistryRêbaz û teknîkî
Registry

Rêbazek, danehevek an pirsek bîne.

Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.