GCRI · Registry
Maf û eşkerekirin
Every record carries rights: who owns the content, under what licence it may be reused, who may see it and when it may be withdrawn. Openness serves verification and reuse, but some records hold personal, sensitive, culturally protected or commercially restricted information. This page sets out how licences, access classes, embargoes and withdrawals are recorded, where they conflict, and what rights holders and reviewers need before a record is disclosed to a wider audience.
Rights and disclosure in seven parts.
- 01The questionRights and disclosure: how the risk develops
- 02In the five domainsRights decide what each domain’s data may be used for
- 03NîşanderWhat is measured, and how well
- 04ÇavkanîWhere the evidence comes from
- 05BiryarWho decides, and what the evidence serves
- 06Core questionsWhat experts ask about disclosure
- 07MechanismsWhy disclosure decisions are hard
Rights and disclosure: how the risk develops.
Publication rights, withdrawal and audience. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Licence ambiguity
A record has no licence, a licence in prose only, or one licence on the landing page and another in the metadata. Careful reusers avoid it, careless ones reuse it wrongly, and holders cannot enforce terms that were never stated clearly.
Audience leakage
A record meant for a programme team is exported, cached or indexed alongside public ones. Restricted fields appear in search results or partner copies, and once harvested the disclosure cannot be reversed.
Embargo slippage
Embargo end dates can be recorded without being enforced, or enforced without being recorded. Content is then released early against agreements, or stays closed long after obligations end, defeating the openness that funders require.
Withdrawal against the record
A rights holder asks for removal while the scholarly record calls for persistence. Erasure rights, takedown notices and retraction norms pull in different directions, and an unrecorded removal leaves citations pointing at nothing.
Interoperability console.
The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.
Interoperability console
Rights and disclosure · Crosswalk · Profile v2
Field mappings
| identifier | id | copy | Derbas |
| evidence_label | quality.label | enum map | Derbas |
| licence | rights.licence | SPDX id | Ambiguous |
| version | version | semver | Derbas |
Conformance
Rights decide what each domain’s data may be used for.
- TenduristîIn practiceHealth data are used only under their legal basis.What a reader can checkPurpose and basis recorded
- Cûrbecûrbûna jîndaranIn practiceIndigenous data follow CARE principles.What a reader can checkRights-holder terms
- EnerjîIn practiceGrid topology stays restricted.What a reader can checkSensitivity class
Rights records are attached to every dataset used in rêzeya Pergalên Stratejîk. Machine-readable obligations are the subject of NS-10 in the proposed Nexus Standards.
- Rights-holder concerns about any use.
- Licence corrections.
Stok, herik, dereng û sînorê guherînê.
Du stok, zext û kapasîteya adaptasyonê, bi xelekeyeke mezinbûnê ya xurtker, bersiveke hevsengiyê ya dereng û zirarê dema ku zext ji kapasîteyê derbas dibe têne girêdan; li derveyî sînor pergal dikare biguhere. Modela fêrkirinê bi nirxên nimûneyî yên diyarkirî, ne pêşbînî.
Kontrol
- Zêdebûna zextê
- 6.0% salê
- Bandora kapasîteyê di kêmkirina zextê de
- 4.0% salê
- Bersiva veberhênanê li hember zextê ya hatî dîtin
- 20%
- Derengiya têgihîştinê
- 4.0 sal
- Sînorê guherînê yê zextê
- 60 indeks
- Zêdebûn li derveyî sînor
- 2.0 carî
- Salên simulekirî
- 50 sal
Xwendin
- Zexta herî bilind
- 113 nîşander
- Kapasîte di dawiyê de
- 186 indeks
- Salên li ser sînor
- 15.8 sal
Jimar, rêbaz û çavkanî
| Sal | Zextê | Kapasîte | Hatî dîtin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 |
| 4 | 23.3 | 44.9 | 21.2 |
| 8 | 27.2 | 42.2 | 24.0 |
| 12 | 31.7 | 42.3 | 27.7 |
| 16 | 36.8 | 45.5 | 32.2 |
| 20 | 42.3 | 51.5 | 37.2 |
| 24 | 47.9 | 60.3 | 42.6 |
| 28 | 53.2 | 71.3 | 48.0 |
| 32 | 57.8 | 84.3 | 53.1 |
| 36 | 66.4 | 98.4 | 58.4 |
| 40 | 82.7 | 115.9 | 69.7 |
| 44 | 97.8 | 139.7 | 83.8 |
| 48 | 109.1 | 169.4 | 97.3 |
Rêbaz
- Dînamîkên pergalê Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
- Veguherînên krîtîk û xalên guherînê Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
- Diagrama xelekeya sedemî Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
- Pankeya nediyarîyê (Monte Carlo ya parametreyan) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
- Hesasiyeta yek-yek (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley
Dane
No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.
Li seranserê şeş stûnan, bi pêşengiya Nexus Consortium
- Ceribandin Labs
- Hatiye avakirin di Registry li Foundry
- Tê ceribandin li Registry li Universe
- Hatiye kodkirin di Bingeh û rêveberî di Standards de
- Hatiye weşandin di Registry di Reports de
- Tê de tê dayîn Fakulteya Rêveberî, Siyaset û Karûbarên Navneteweyî di Academy de
What is measured, and how well.
Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.
| Indicator | Unit | Cadence | Source type | Nîşan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Records with a machine-readable licence | share of records | monthly | Licence metadata | ÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ |
| Records with an access class | share of records | monthly | Schema validation | ÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ |
| Licence conflicts between metadata and landing page | count | quarterly | Sampled comparison | ÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ |
| Embargoes past their end date and unreleased | count | weekly | Embargo register | ÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ |
| Withdrawal and takedown requests | count by stated ground | quarterly | Case records | REPORTED |
| Time to act on a takedown request | roj | per case | Case records | ÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ |
| Disclosure reviews completed before wider release | share of releases | monthly | Review records | ÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ |
How rights and disclosure is modelled, measured and tested.
Model, texmînên wî, daneyên wî û nediyariya wî, bi şeweyê ku zanyar an endezyar kontrol bike. Avahî rêbazên weşandî dişopînin. Nirxên hatine xêzkirin nimûneyî ne, ne encam in.
Daneset û çavkanî
The data classes behind rights and disclosure and what is recorded about each before it is used.
| Çîna daneyê | Çavkanî hatiye tomarkirin | Biryar hatiye diyarkirin | Lîsans hatiye kontrolkirin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wêneyên peykî, optîk û radar | sensor, asta pêvajoyê, dîroka wergirtinê | mezinahiya pîkselê û vegera çavdêriyê | her dîmen |
| Vekolîna nû û derxistina modela avhewa | model, ceribandin, endam, guhertoyê | tor û gava demê | her weşan |
| Sensor û pîvanên cihê xwe | stasyon, amûr, tomara kalîbrasyonê | xal û rêjeya nimûnegirtinê | her tor |
| Rûbirûbûna nifûs û mal û milkan | rêbaz, berhema salê, çavkaniyên têketinê | mezinahiya şaneyê û yekeya wê | her weşan |
| Sînor û erdnîgariya referansê | hilberîner, çap, dîrok | pîvan | her çap |
- Xetên eslê daneyê
- Qeyda W3C PROV ji çavkaniyê heta wêneyê
- Prensîp
- FAIR: dîtbar, gihîştbar, hevgirtî, ji nû ve bikaranîn
- Valahî
- wekî winda tê nîşandan, tu carî bi bêdengî nayê dagirtin
Where the evidence comes from.
Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.
| Çavkanî | What it gives | Licence class |
|---|---|---|
| Creative Commons licence suite | Standard licences with machine-readable identifiers for reuse terms | Licence texts free to use |
| SPDX License List | Standard short identifiers for software and data licences | Open data, free to reuse |
| RightsStatements.org | Standard statements of copyright and reuse status for cultural and research objects | Open, free to apply |
| Local Contexts Hub | Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices attached to records | Free to use under Local Contexts terms |
| Sherpa Romeo | Publisher and journal policies on self-archiving and embargoes | Free to search, Jisc terms |
| W3C ODRL Information Model | A vocabulary for permissions, prohibitions and duties in machine-readable form | W3C document licence, free to implement |
| cOAlition S Journal Checker Tool | Routes to compliance with funder open access requirements | Free to use |
Who decides, and what the evidence serves.
Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Who decides | The question | Evidence this page serves |
|---|---|---|
| Rights holders and authors | Under which licence and to which audience a record may be released | Funder requirements, publisher policies and the record’s sensitive fields |
| Data protection officers | Whether personal data in a record may be disclosed, restricted or erased | Access class, lawful basis, retention and the public interest in a persistent record |
| Indigenous data governance bodies | Whether and how community data or knowledge may be shared | CARE principles, Local Contexts labels and the community’s recorded terms |
| Platform publishers and repository managers | Whether to act on a takedown or withdrawal request | The request’s grounds, the rights record and the policy for leaving a tombstone |
Outputs this topic produces
- Rights panels showing licence, rights holder, access class and embargo for every record
- A disclosure review step before any record moves to a wider audience
- A withdrawal and takedown route with its grounds and the tombstone it leaves
- Machine-readable licence identifiers carried in every export
What experts ask about disclosure.
- Who holds the right to publish a record, and who can veto it?
- How should audiences be defined when a record is useful but sensitive?
- When does a public interest in disclosure outweigh a private interest in protection?
- How is protected and Indigenous knowledge kept under its holders’ control?
- What remains visible after a record is withdrawn?
Why disclosure decisions are hard.
Disclosure risk is cumulative. A record that is harmless alone can identify a person or a vulnerable site when combined with others, which is why statistical agencies apply disclosure control before releasing data. Rights are also layered: an author may hold copyright, a funder may require open access, a community may hold collective rights over traditional knowledge, and a data subject holds privacy rights that override both.
Research data communities summarise the aim as findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, while principles for Indigenous data governance add collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility and ethics. The Registry’s three classes, public, restricted and protected, are described on rights and visibility.
How rights are applied.
- 01
Classification at entry
Each record receives a visibility class and licence before release, decided by its owner within the law.
- 02
Audience control
Restricted records are visible only to people authorised for a purpose, enforced with access controls from ewlehiya sîber û kriptografî.
- 03
Withdrawal
Withdrawal removes a record from public view; its identifier resolves to a notice with the date and any replacement.
- 04
Sînor
Nothing published can be fully recalled. Disclosure judgements involve values as well as rules, and re-identification risk changes as other data becomes available.
How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.
- 01Ewlehiya sîber û kriptografîTamper-evident record history · Signed exports and releases · Threat modelling of edit pathsApplied here
- 02Nasnameya dîjîtal û pergalên giştî yên dîjîtalIssuer authentication and authority · Contributor disambiguation by the personApplied here
- 03Endezyariya daneyê, hevgirtî û xwedîtîSchema-validated ingestion · Persistent identifier reconciliation · Lineage capture in pipelinesApplied here
Where this page’s references lead.
Sazî û belgeyên ku ev rûpel li hember wan tê xwendin. Rewş û çap diguherin; her girêdan diçe ba saziya derxistinê.
Pirs û bersiv.
Why is a record without a licence a problem?
What is left when a record is withdrawn?
How do the CARE principles relate to open data?
Can a published record be made private again?
Can the Registry publish a record because it is in the public interest?
Where do privacy requests go?
Are restricted records listed publicly?
Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.
rêzeya Pergalên Stratejîk is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- E-nameDergeh GW-GCRIJi vê rûpelê bişîninDelîl, rastkirin, doz, rêbaz, nirxandin, wergerandin an têketina profîlê. Bi nîşana vê rûpelê digihîje, ji ber vê yekê edîtorê xwediyê wê wê bistîne.
- ZenodoDepoya vekirîWê razînin û ji civakê re bişîninTomara xwe li Zenodo bi ORCID iD ya xwe biweşînin, paşê wê li wir ji civaka Reports re bişînin. Kurator wê vedikolin; DOI ya we dimîne.
- rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkGCRISee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Tu carî daneyên şexsî, hûrgiliyên binesaza hesas an tiştekî ku mafê we yê parvekirinê tune ne neşînin. Beşdarî berî bikaranînê tê nirxandin; şandina wê nivîskarî an mafên edîtorî nade û sponsorî tu carî encamekê nakire.
Rêbazek, danehevek an pirsek bîne.
Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.
Belgeyên hiqûqî.
Nexşe, dane û jimarên vê malperê ji bo çarçoveyê û agahiyên giştî têne nîşandan. Ew ne şîret, ne pêşbînî û ne hişyarî ne; sînorên agahiyê di Daxuyaniyên Berpirsiyariyê û Daxuyaniyên Daneyê de hatine diyarkirin.