GCRI · Registry

出版物の登録

A publication registration attaches a persistent identifier and a structured description to a work so that it can be found, cited and linked for as long as the record lasts. The identifier only works if the metadata behind it is accurate and the link still resolves. This page sets out how registration works through agencies such as Crossref and DataCite, what makes registration metadata trustworthy, and where registrations fail in ways that ripple into citation, funding and assessment.

02質問

Publication registrations: how the risk develops.

Publication metadata and identifiers. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

メカニズム

Identifier without a target

A DOI resolves to a landing page that has moved, lapsed or been replaced. The identifier persists while the thing it named becomes unreachable, and every citation that uses it now leads nowhere useful.

メカニズム

Duplicate registrations

The same work is registered twice, by publisher and repository, or as preprint and article without a relation between them. Citations and usage split across identifiers, and one work appears to be two.

メカニズム

Metadata drift

Titles, authors, affiliations or funding are corrected on the landing page but not in the registered metadata, or the reverse. Downstream indexes copy whichever state they harvested, and the record diverges across システム.

メカニズム

Assessment inherits the errors

Funders, institutions and rankings count outputs from registration metadata. Missing contributor identifiers, unresolved affiliations and absent award identifiers credit work to the wrong people, the wrong organisation or to no funder at all.

03監視

記録台帳。

このテーマを追跡するためにチームが使う画面:その指標、状態、決定。名前は例であり、値はイメージです。

記録台帳

Publication registrations · Registry · Ledger head 9810659

  • 登録済みの記録
    5110
  • 来歴が完全な記録の割合、%
    95平常
  • 未解決の訂正
    7注視
  • 権利の保留
    3情報
完全性チェックに合格GCRI・Registry

最新の記録

NX-R-01836プログラムの状況v35638543登録済み
NX-P-72194公開v19858170登録済み
NX-E-42250エビデンス記録v35604753訂正受付中
NX-C-37438参加v16211607権利による保留

版の履歴

  1. v1NEW情報源とともに登録済み
  2. v2FIX単位を訂正、理由を記録
  3. v3OPEN訂正を請求済み
Record ledger: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Publication registrations.例示の名称と説明用の値です。設計であり、記録でも稼働中のシステムでもありません。
04In the five domains

Registrations make outputs from every domain findable.

Registrations feed the citation records of 報告書. DOIs (ISO 26324), ORCID and ROR identify outputs, people and organisations; NS-2 sets the citation format in the proposed Nexus Standards.

  • Missing identifiers for programme outputs.
  • Corrections to registration metadata.
05手法とエビデンス

How publication registrations is modelled, measured and tested.

モデル、その仮定、データ、不確実性を、科学者やエンジニアが確認する形で示します。構造は公表された手法に従っています。描かれた値は例示であり、知見ではありません。

データセットと来歴

The data classes behind publication registrations and what is recorded about each before it is used.

データ区分来歴を記録済み解像度を明示ライセンス確認済み
衛星画像、光学とレーダーセンサー、処理レベル、取得日画素サイズと再訪周期シーンごと
再解析と気候モデルの出力モデル、実験、メンバー、バージョングリッドと時間ステップリリースごと
現地センサーと計測器観測所、機器、校正記録地点とサンプリング・レートネットワークごと
人口と資産のエクスポージャー手法、作成年、入力ソースセルの大きさと単位リリースごと
境界と参照地理作成者、版、日付縮尺版ごと
系譜
情報源から図までの W3C PROV 記録
原則
FAIR:見つけやすく、アクセス可能で、相互運用でき、再利用できる
ギャップ
欠損として表示し、黙って埋めることはしない
データの分類と、それぞれに記録される来歴項目。データセットは、そのライセンスが利用を認めて初めて、名称で掲載されます。
FAIR 原則・GO FAIR と FORCE11W3C PROV・World Wide Web Consortium不確実性の一貫した扱いに関するガイダンス・IPCCCEOS 解析即応データ・地球観測衛星委員会
06指標

何を、どの程度うまく測定しているか。

各指標には、その単位、更新頻度、背後にある出典の種類、値が持つことになるエビデンスのラベルが付いています。値は表示しません:プログラムが自らの権限のもとで値を提供します。

指標単位周期出典の種類ラベル
Registered outputs with a persistent identifiershare of outputs月次Registration agency metadata報告値
Identifier resolution successshare of resolution attempts毎週Resolver probes観測
Metadata completenessshare of recommended fields populated月次Agency participation reports観測
Contributors with an ORCID iDshare of contributors月次Registration metadata観測
Affiliations with a ROR IDshare of affiliations月次Registration metadata観測
Outputs with funder and award identifiersshare of funded outputs月次Registration metadata観測
Suspected duplicate registrations件数四半期ごとTitle and contributor matching推定
Agreement between landing page and metadatashare of sampled records四半期ごとSampled comparison観測
07出典

エビデンスの出所。

名前の明示された公開データセットと機関の記録。それぞれにライセンス区分があります。合意に基づく出典は、その条件のもとでのみ使用し、再公開することはありません。

出典提供するものライセンス区分
Crossref metadataDOI metadata for journal articles, books, preprints, conference papers, grants and moreOpen metadata, no restrictions on reuse
DataCite metadataDOI metadata for datasets, software, instruments and other research outputsCC0
ORCID registryContributor identifiers and the works, affiliations and awards linked to themCC0 for the public data file
ROR (Research Organization Registry)Affiliation identifiers for the organisations named in registrationsCC0
ISSN PortalIdentifiers and key titles for serial publicationsBasic records open; full records by subscription from the ISSN International Centre
OpenAlexAn open index of works, authors, institutions and venues built from registration and other metadataCC0
Crossref Participation 報告書Field-level metadata completeness for each member organisation開く
08決定

誰が決め、エビデンスが何に役立つか。

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

誰が決定するか質問このページが提供するエビデンス
Publishers and repository managersWhich metadata to deposit, and how to fix incomplete or duplicated registrationsCompleteness against the agency schema, resolution checks and suspected duplicates
Institutional librariansWhich outputs to report for the institution and how to attribute themContributor and affiliation identifiers in the registered metadata
FundersWhich outputs to attribute to an award in reporting and evaluationFunder and award identifiers in registrations, checked against the award record
Registration agenciesHow to support members whose deposits fall short of schema or resolution requirementsField-level completeness and resolution records for the member’s identifiers

このトピックが生み出す成果物

  • Registration views showing identifier, registration agency, metadata fields and resolution state
  • Metadata completeness checks against the agency schema before deposit
  • Relation maps linking preprints, versions of record, datasets and software
  • Lists of suspected duplicate registrations for steward review
09中核となる問い

What experts ask about registrations.

  • Which metadata fields are needed for discovery, and which for verification?
  • How should versions, translations and derived works relate to one another?
  • How are authors, institutions and funders identified unambiguously?
  • What should an identifier resolve to after a work is withdrawn?
  • How can registration status avoid being read as a quality judgement?
10メカニズム

How persistent identifiers work.

Web addresses break when sites are reorganised. Persistent identifier システム separate a work’s identity from its location: a registration agency issues an identifier, the publisher maintains the metadata and the current location, and a resolver redirects readers. Digital Object Identifiers are the familiar example for publications and datasets, with parallel open identifiers for researchers and research organisations.

Registration also creates relationships. A record can state that a report is a new version of an earlier one, that it is translated from another, that it relies on a dataset or that it has been corrected. When those relations are recorded consistently, a reader holding any version can find all the others.

11手法と限界

What a good registration holds.

  1. 01

    Descriptive metadata

    Title, contributors with their roles, dates, language, abstract and subject terms, in an open schema.

  2. 02

    関係

    Links to versions, corrections, datasets and methods, so the record sits in a graph rather than alone.

  3. 03

    Rights and access

    The licence and access conditions, consistent with rights and disclosure.

  4. 04

    限界

    Metadata quality varies with the care of whoever supplies it. An identifier proves that a work was registered, not that it was reviewed or is correct, and identifier システム depend on the institutions that maintain them.

12手法

どのように研究され、手法が言えないことは何か。

  1. データエンジニアリング、相互運用性、データ・スチュワードシップスキーマ検証付きの取り込み · 永続識別子の照合 · パイプラインにおける系譜の記録ここでの適用
  2. デジタル ID と公共デジタル・システム発行者の認証と権限 · 本人による貢献者の識別ここでの適用
  3. サイバーセキュリティと暗号改ざんが検知できる記録の履歴 · 署名付きのエクスポートとリリース · 編集経路の脅威モデリングここでの適用
13Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

このページの読解の基準となる機関と文書。状態と版は変わります。各リンクは発行機関へ移動します。

14質問

質問と回答。

What does a DOI guarantee?
That the identifier is unique and that its registrant has committed to keep it resolving to a current location. It does not guarantee the quality, review status or truth of the work it names.
Why do some works have two DOIs?
Usually because a preprint and a published article, or a repository copy and a publisher copy, were registered separately. Relation metadata should link them; when it does not, citations split.
Should datasets and software be registered?
Yes, where they are cited or reused. DataCite and similar agencies register them so they can be credited, versioned and linked to the publications that depend on them.
Why do contributor and affiliation identifiers matter?
Because names are ambiguous. ORCID iDs and ROR IDs in the metadata let funders, institutions and indexes attribute a work to the right people and organisations without guessing from text.
Does a registered publication mean it was peer reviewed?
No. Registration records that a work exists and how to cite it. Its review status is stated separately, as recorded.
Can a publication have more than one identifier?
It can, for example a report identifier and a dataset identifier. The Registry records each and the relations between them.
What happens to an identifier if a work is withdrawn?
It keeps resolving, to a notice that explains the withdrawal and points to any replacement.
報告書貢献する

このページからエビデンスを提供する。

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRI登録簿手法と技術
登録簿

手法、データセット、または問いを持ち込んでください。

情報提供と問い合わせは本日から受け付けています。問い合わせには参照番号が付き、次の手順が示されます。申請、支払い、計算資源の割り当て、登録は、担当チーム、規約、審査体制が整ってから開始します。

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.