GCRI · Registry

権利と開示

Every record carries rights: who owns the content, under what licence it may be reused, who may see it and when it may be withdrawn. Openness serves verification and reuse, but some records hold personal, sensitive, culturally protected or commercially restricted information. This page sets out how licences, access classes, embargoes and withdrawals are recorded, where they conflict, and what rights holders and reviewers need before a record is disclosed to a wider audience.

02質問

Rights and disclosure: how the risk develops.

Publication rights, withdrawal and audience. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

メカニズム

Licence ambiguity

A record has no licence, a licence in prose only, or one licence on the landing page and another in the metadata. Careful reusers avoid it, careless ones reuse it wrongly, and holders cannot enforce terms that were never stated clearly.

メカニズム

Audience leakage

A record meant for a programme team is exported, cached or indexed alongside public ones. Restricted fields appear in search results or partner copies, and once harvested the disclosure cannot be reversed.

メカニズム

Embargo slippage

Embargo end dates can be recorded without being enforced, or enforced without being recorded. Content is then released early against agreements, or stays closed long after obligations end, defeating the openness that funders require.

メカニズム

Withdrawal against the record

A rights holder asks for removal while the scholarly record calls for persistence. Erasure rights, takedown notices and retraction norms pull in different directions, and an unrecorded removal leaves citations pointing at nothing.

03監視

Interoperability console.

このテーマを追跡するためにチームが使う画面:その指標、状態、決定。名前は例であり、値はイメージです。

Interoperability console

Rights and disclosure · Crosswalk · Profile v2

Test suite runningGCRI・Registry

Field mappings

identifieridcopy合格
evidence_labelquality.labelenum map合格
licencerights.licenceSPDX idAmbiguous
versionversionsemver合格

適合性

Required fields97 of 100 requiredControlled terms97 of 95 requiredRound trip83 of 95 required
Interoperability console: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Rights and disclosure.例示の名称と説明用の値です。設計であり、記録でも稼働中のシステムでもありません。
04In the five domains

Rights decide what each domain’s data may be used for.

05シミュレーター

ストック、フロー、遅れ、そして転換点の閾値。

二つのストック、圧力と 適応能力という 2 つのストックが、自己強化的な成長ループ、遅れて働く均衡化の反応、圧力が能力を上回ったときの損害で結ばれています。閾値を越えるとシステムは転換しえます。明示された例示値を使う教育用モデルであり、予測ではありません。

管理策

圧力の増大
年 6.0%
圧力を下げる上での能力の効果
年 4.0%
認識された圧力への投資の反応
20%
認知の遅れ
4.0 年
圧力の転換しきい値
60 指数
閾値を越えた後の増幅
2.0 倍
シミュレーションした年数
50 年

読み取り値

最大圧力
113 指数
最後に残る能力
186 指数
閾値を超えた年数
15.8 年
数値、手法、出典
年圧力能力知覚された
020.050.020.0
423.344.921.2
827.242.224.0
1231.742.327.7
1636.845.532.2
2042.351.537.2
2447.960.342.6
2853.271.348.0
3257.884.353.1
3666.498.458.4
4082.7115.969.7
4497.8139.783.8
48109.1169.497.3

手法

  1. システム・ダイナミクス Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
  2. 臨界転移と転換点 Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
  3. 因果ループ図 Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
  4. 不確実性ファン(パラメータ・モンテカルロ) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011)、Visualising uncertainty about the future、Science 333
  5. 一因子ずつの感度分析(トルネード図) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

データ

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

ストック、フロー、遅れ、転換点のしきい値。説明用の教材モデルで、実測データではなくコントロールで設定した値に基づいて動きます。手法:システムダイナミクス(Forrester (1961)、Industrial Dynamics、MIT Press、Sterman (2000)、Business Dynamics)、臨界遷移と転換点(Scheffer and others (2009)、Early-warning signals for critical transitions、Nature 461)、因果ループ図(Sterman (2000)、Business Dynamics、McGraw-Hill)。
06指標

何を、どの程度うまく測定しているか。

各指標には、その単位、更新頻度、背後にある出典の種類、値が持つことになるエビデンスのラベルが付いています。値は表示しません:プログラムが自らの権限のもとで値を提供します。

指標単位周期出典の種類ラベル
Records with a machine-readable licenceshare of records月次Licence metadata観測
Records with an access classshare of records月次Schema validation観測
Licence conflicts between metadata and landing page件数四半期ごとSampled comparison観測
Embargoes past their end date and unreleased件数毎週Embargo register観測
Withdrawal and takedown requestscount by stated ground四半期ごとCase records報告値
Time to act on a takedown request日per caseCase records観測
Disclosure reviews completed before wider releaseshare of releases月次Review records観測
07手法とエビデンス

How rights and disclosure is modelled, measured and tested.

モデル、その仮定、データ、不確実性を、科学者やエンジニアが確認する形で示します。構造は公表された手法に従っています。描かれた値は例示であり、知見ではありません。

データセットと来歴

The data classes behind rights and disclosure and what is recorded about each before it is used.

データ区分来歴を記録済み解像度を明示ライセンス確認済み
衛星画像、光学とレーダーセンサー、処理レベル、取得日画素サイズと再訪周期シーンごと
再解析と気候モデルの出力モデル、実験、メンバー、バージョングリッドと時間ステップリリースごと
現地センサーと計測器観測所、機器、校正記録地点とサンプリング・レートネットワークごと
人口と資産のエクスポージャー手法、作成年、入力ソースセルの大きさと単位リリースごと
境界と参照地理作成者、版、日付縮尺版ごと
系譜
情報源から図までの W3C PROV 記録
原則
FAIR:見つけやすく、アクセス可能で、相互運用でき、再利用できる
ギャップ
欠損として表示し、黙って埋めることはしない
データの分類と、それぞれに記録される来歴項目。データセットは、そのライセンスが利用を認めて初めて、名称で掲載されます。
FAIR 原則・GO FAIR と FORCE11W3C PROV・World Wide Web Consortium不確実性の一貫した扱いに関するガイダンス・IPCCCEOS 解析即応データ・地球観測衛星委員会
08出典

エビデンスの出所。

名前の明示された公開データセットと機関の記録。それぞれにライセンス区分があります。合意に基づく出典は、その条件のもとでのみ使用し、再公開することはありません。

出典提供するものライセンス区分
Creative Commons licence suiteStandard licences with machine-readable identifiers for reuse termsLicence texts free to use
SPDX ライセンス・リストStandard short identifiers for software and data licencesOpen data, free to reuse
RightsStatements.orgStandard statements of copyright and reuse status for cultural and research objectsOpen, free to apply
Local Contexts HubTraditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices attached to recordsFree to use under Local Contexts terms
Sherpa RomeoPublisher and journal policies on self-archiving and embargoesFree to search, Jisc terms
W3C ODRL Information ModelA vocabulary for permissions, prohibitions and duties in machine-readable formW3C document licence, free to implement
cOAlition S Journal Checker ToolRoutes to compliance with funder open access requirementsFree to use
09決定

誰が決め、エビデンスが何に役立つか。

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

誰が決定するか質問このページが提供するエビデンス
Rights holders and authorsUnder which licence and to which audience a record may be releasedFunder requirements, publisher policies and the record’s sensitive fields
Data protection officersWhether personal data in a record may be disclosed, restricted or erasedAccess class, lawful basis, retention and the public interest in a persistent record
Indigenous data governance bodiesWhether and how community data or knowledge may be sharedCARE principles, Local Contexts labels and the community’s recorded terms
Platform publishers and repository managersWhether to act on a takedown or withdrawal requestThe request’s grounds, the rights record and the policy for leaving a tombstone

このトピックが生み出す成果物

  • Rights panels showing licence, rights holder, access class and embargo for every record
  • A disclosure review step before any record moves to a wider audience
  • A withdrawal and takedown route with its grounds and the tombstone it leaves
  • Machine-readable licence identifiers carried in every export
10中核となる問い

What experts ask about disclosure.

  • Who holds the right to publish a record, and who can veto it?
  • How should audiences be defined when a record is useful but sensitive?
  • When does a public interest in disclosure outweigh a private interest in protection?
  • How is protected and Indigenous knowledge kept under its holders’ control?
  • What remains visible after a record is withdrawn?
11メカニズム

Why disclosure decisions are hard.

Disclosure risk is cumulative. A record that is harmless alone can identify a person or a vulnerable site when combined with others, which is why statistical agencies apply disclosure control before releasing data. Rights are also layered: an author may hold copyright, a funder may require open access, a community may hold collective rights over traditional knowledge, and a data subject holds privacy rights that override both.

Research data communities summarise the aim as findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, while principles for Indigenous data governance add collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility and ethics. The Registry’s three classes, public, restricted and protected, are described on rights and visibility.

12手法と限界

How rights are applied.

  1. 01

    Classification at entry

    Each record receives a visibility class and licence before release, decided by its owner within the law.

  2. 02

    Audience control

    Restricted records are visible only to people authorised for a purpose, enforced with access controls from サイバーセキュリティと暗号.

  3. 03

    引き出し

    Withdrawal removes a record from public view; its identifier resolves to a notice with the date and any replacement.

  4. 04

    限界

    Nothing published can be fully recalled. Disclosure judgements involve values as well as rules, and re-identification risk changes as other data becomes available.

13手法

どのように研究され、手法が言えないことは何か。

  1. サイバーセキュリティと暗号改ざんが検知できる記録の履歴 · 署名付きのエクスポートとリリース · 編集経路の脅威モデリングここでの適用
  2. デジタル ID と公共デジタル・システム発行者の認証と権限 · 本人による貢献者の識別ここでの適用
  3. データエンジニアリング、相互運用性、データ・スチュワードシップスキーマ検証付きの取り込み · 永続識別子の照合 · パイプラインにおける系譜の記録ここでの適用
14Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

このページの読解の基準となる機関と文書。状態と版は変わります。各リンクは発行機関へ移動します。

15質問

質問と回答。

Why is a record without a licence a problem?
Because by default most jurisdictions reserve all rights, so careful reusers cannot rely on it and careless ones reuse it anyway. A clear licence protects both the holder and the reuser.
What is left when a record is withdrawn?
A tombstone: the identifier, basic citation metadata and the reason for withdrawal where it can be stated. The content is removed or restricted, and citations still resolve to an explanation.
How do the CARE principles relate to open data?
They complement FAIR by asking who benefits and who decides. For Indigenous data, openness follows the community’s authority to control rather than being assumed by default.
Can a published record be made private again?
Its access class can be narrowed, but copies already harvested may persist elsewhere. That is why disclosure review happens before release, not after.
Can the Registry publish a record because it is in the public interest?
No. The Registry cannot make a record public on its own initiative. The record owner decides, within the law.
Where do privacy requests go?
To プライバシーに関する請求フォームに送ることができる。受領通知には参照番号と次のステップが示される。
Are restricted records listed publicly?
Their existence is disclosed only where the owner allows. Their content is never shown in public views.
報告書貢献する

このページからエビデンスを提供する。

報告書 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRI登録簿手法と技術
登録簿

手法、データセット、または問いを持ち込んでください。

情報提供と問い合わせは本日から受け付けています。問い合わせには参照番号が付き、次の手順が示されます。申請、支払い、計算資源の割り当て、登録は、担当チーム、規約、審査体制が整ってから開始します。

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.