Skip to content

GCRI · تەکنەلۆجیاکانی کوانتەم

کریپتۆگرافیی دوای کوانتەم

Post-quantum cryptography replaces public-key algorithms that a future quantum computer could break with new classical algorithms designed to resist it. NIST has published standards, protocols are being updated, and organisations face a long migration across software, hardware and certificates. This page sets out the new algorithms, how migration is planned and measured, and what evidence serves the organisations and agencies carrying it out.

02The question

Post quantum cryptography: how the risk develops.

Transition security and algorithm standards. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

میکانیزم

New hard problems

Post-quantum algorithms rely on mathematical problems, such as those on lattices or hash functions, for which no efficient quantum attack is known.

میکانیزم

Larger keys and signatures

Many post-quantum schemes use larger keys or signatures than current ones, affecting bandwidth, storage and constrained devices.

میکانیزم

Hybrid modes hedge risk

Combining a classical and a post-quantum algorithm keeps security if one is later broken, a common choice during transition.

میکانیزم

Agility eases future change

سیستەم designed to swap algorithms easily reduce the cost of this migration and the next one.

03چاودێری

شوێنکەوتکەری گواستنەوە بۆ دوای کوانتەم.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

شوێنکەوتکەری گواستنەوە بۆ دوای کوانتەم

Post quantum cryptography · Crypto inventory · Wave 3

داتای خاوەن تەمەنی درێژ لە مەترسیداGCRI · تەکنەلۆجیاکانی کوانتەم

گواستنەوە

  1. لیستی موڵکهەموو کریپتۆ
  2. پێشەنگکردنتەمەنی داتا
  3. هەڵبژاردنئەلگۆریتمە ستانداردەکان
  4. دامەزراندنی تێکەڵکلاسیکی و PQC
  5. تاقیکردنەوەهاوکاریی لەیەکتر
  6. گۆڕین بۆ سیستەمی نوێکشانەوە لە کار

سیستەمەکان بەپێی پێشەنگی

واژۆکردنی ئەرشیفRSA-204829ML-DSA تێکەڵتاقیکاری
دەروازەی VPNECDH8ML-KEM تێکەڵپلاندارێژراو
HSM ی پارەدانRSA-307211نەخشەڕێگای فرۆشیاربەربەستکراو
Web TLSECDHE2ئاڵوگۆڕی کلیلی تێکەڵتەواو بوو

پێشکەوتن

لیستکراو، %74 of 100 requiredتێکەڵی دامەزراو، %19 of 50 requiredکشاوە، %5 of 25 required
Post-quantum migration tracker: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Post quantum cryptography.ناو و بەهای نموونەیی؛ دیزاینێکە، نەک تۆمار یان سیستەمی ڕاستەوخۆ.
04لە ناو بوارەکان

Every domain that keeps secrets for decades must migrate.

05ڕێگا و بەڵگە

How post quantum cryptography is modelled, measured and tested.

مۆدێلەکە، گریمانەکانی، داتاکانی و نادڵنیاییەکەی، بەو شێوەیەی زانا یان ئەندازیارێک دەیپشکنێت. پێکهاتەکان ڕێگا بڵاوکراوەکان دەگرنەبەر. بەهاکانی کێشراو نموونەییە، نەک دۆزینەوە.

مۆدێلی سیستەم

The couplings between the systems in post quantum cryptography: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−+کوانتەمسایبەریکۆمەڵگە خۆجێییەکانئابووریR بەهێزکەرB هاوسەنگ
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
پرەنسیپە ڕێنماییەکانی FAIR · GO FAIR و FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web Consortiumڕێنمایی بۆ مامەڵەی یەکسان لەگەڵ نادڵنیاییەکان · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
06نیشاندەرەکان

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeناونیشان
Standardised post-quantum algorithmscountper standard releaseNIST and other standards bodiesئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Protocols with post-quantum support specifiedcountper assessmentIETF and other standardsئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Web traffic using post-quantum key agreementpercent of connectionsmonthlyNetwork measurementsچاودێریکراو
Organisations with migration planspercent of surveyed organisationsper surveySurveysREPORTED
Cryptanalysis results against candidate schemescount of significant attacksper reviewCryptographic literatureREPORTED
Validated implementationscountannualCryptographic module validation listsئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
07سەرچاوەکان

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

سەرچاوەWhat it givesLicence class
NIST post-quantum cryptography project and FIPS 203, 204 and 205Standards, documentation and additional selectionsPublic domain, US government
IETF post-quantum and hybrid protocol workIntegration into TLS, SSH and other protocolsOpen, IETF Trust terms
National cyber agency migration guidanceTimelines and prioritiesPublic, terms per agency
Open Quantum Safe projectOpen-source implementations for testingOpen source, MIT licence
Cloudflare Radar and similar measurementsAdoption in web trafficPublic, terms per provider (to check)
08بڕیارەکان

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Quantum Technologies prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

کێ بڕیار دەداتThe questionEvidence this page serves
Organisations and security teamsکام سیستەمە to migrate first and howPlanning guides; performance comparisons
Standards bodiesWhich algorithms and parameters to standardiseCryptanalysis evidence
VendorsWhen and how to ship post-quantum supportAdoption and protocol evidence

Outputs this topic produces

  • Migration planning guides with inventory and prioritisation steps
  • Performance comparisons of standard algorithms
  • Adoption tracking summaries
  • Evidence notes on cryptanalysis of new schemes
09Core questions

What experts ask.

Migration questions start with an inventory.

  • Where does an organisation use public-key cryptography, in which سیستەمە, protocols, devices and suppliers?
  • Which data must remain confidential long enough to be at risk from future decryption?
  • Which post-quantum algorithms are standardised, and what are their performance and size trade-offs?
  • Should systems combine classical and post-quantum algorithms during the transition?
  • Can systems change algorithms easily in future, a property known as crypto-agility?
10Mechanisms

Mechanisms and drivers.

Today’s public-key cryptography rests on mathematical problems, such as factoring large numbers, that are hard for classical computers but could be solved efficiently by a large quantum computer running known algorithms. Symmetric encryption and hash functions are much less affected and can be strengthened by using longer keys. The urgent problem is therefore key exchange and digital signatures.

Two pressures drive timing. The harvest-now, decrypt-later threat means confidential data intercepted today could be read once a capable machine exists. Migration time is long: cryptography is embedded in hardware, firmware, protocols and supply chains, and some devices stay in service for decades. If the time data must stay secret plus the time migration takes exceeds the time until a capable quantum computer exists, data is already at risk.

11Methods and data

How it is studied, and where the methods stop.

Method or dataWhat it showsسنوورەکان
Cryptographic inventory and discovery toolsWhere vulnerable algorithms are usedEmbedded and third-party cryptography is easily missed
Cryptanalysis of candidate algorithmsConfidence in algorithm securityNew algorithms have less analysis history; some candidates were broken during evaluation
Performance and interoperability testingKey sizes, speed and protocol fitResults vary with hardware and implementation
Risk-based migration planningPriorities by data lifetime and system criticalityDepends on uncertain quantum timelines
12میتۆدەکان

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

13Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

ئەو لەش و بەڵگەنامانەی ئەم لاپەڕەیەیان لەگەڵ دەخوێنرێتەوە. دۆخ و وەشانەکان دەگۆڕێن؛ هەر بەستەرێک دەچێتە لای لەشی دەرکەر.

14پەیوەست

ئەو شوێنانەی ئەم لاپەڕەیە لە ناو کۆنسۆرتیۆم بۆیان دەبات.

15پرسیارەکان

پرسیار و وەڵام.

What did NIST standardise?
In FIPS 203, 204 and 205, a lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism (ML-KEM), a lattice-based signature (ML-DSA) and a hash-based signature (SLH-DSA), with further algorithms in progress.
Is post-quantum cryptography quantum technology?
No. It runs on ordinary computers. It is designed to resist attacks by quantum computers.
Why use hybrid schemes?
Because combining classical and post-quantum algorithms keeps a connection secure if either is later found weak, hedging the risk of new schemes.
Do we need quantum computers to use post-quantum cryptography?
No. Post-quantum algorithms run on ordinary computers and devices. They are designed to be hard to break even for a future quantum computer.
What is a hybrid approach?
Combining a classical and a post-quantum algorithm so that security holds if either remains unbroken. It is used by some during the transition while confidence in new algorithms grows.
Is the platform’s Universe mission theme on migration readiness active?
The registry lists post-quantum migration readiness as a candidate mission theme for this platform. Mission selection is decided by The Global Risks Forum (GRF) within its instruments, and nothing is active until it is on the record.
Reportsبەشداربە

لەم لاپەڕەیەوە بەڵگە پێشکەش بکە.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIتەکنەلۆجیاکانی کوانتەمتەکنەلۆجیای ئێکسپۆنێنشیاڵڕوانگەی پێشبینیی ستراتیژی
تەکنەلۆجیاکانی کوانتەم

ڕێگایەک، کۆمەڵە داتایەک یان پرسیارێک بهێنە.

زانیاری و پرسیار ئەمڕۆ کراوەن. پرسیارێک ژمارەی ئاماژەی پێدەدرێت و هەنگاوی دواتر دیاری دەکات؛ داواکاری، پارەدان، تەرخانکردنی کۆمپیوتەر و تۆمارکردن تەنیا کاتێک دەکرێنەوە کە تیم، مەرج و توانای پێداچوونەوەیان هەبێت.