GCRI · Teknolojiyên kuantûmê

Krîptografiya piştî kuantûmê

Post-quantum cryptography replaces public-key algorithms that a future quantum computer could break with new classical algorithms designed to resist it. NIST has published standards, protocols are being updated, and organisations face a long migration across software, hardware and certificates. This page sets out the new algorithms, how migration is planned and measured, and what evidence serves the organisations and agencies carrying it out.

01Qeyd

Post quantum cryptography on the record.

02The question

Post quantum cryptography: how the risk develops.

Transition security and algorithm standards. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mekanîzma

New hard problems

Post-quantum algorithms rely on mathematical problems, such as those on lattices or hash functions, for which no efficient quantum attack is known.

Mekanîzma

Larger keys and signatures

Many post-quantum schemes use larger keys or signatures than current ones, affecting bandwidth, storage and constrained devices.

Mekanîzma

Hybrid modes hedge risk

Combining a classical and a post-quantum algorithm keeps security if one is later broken, a common choice during transition.

Mekanîzma

Agility eases future change

Pergal designed to swap algorithms easily reduce the cost of this migration and the next one.

03Çavdêrî bike

Şopînerê koçberiya piştî kuantûmê.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Şopînerê koçberiya piştî kuantûmê

Post quantum cryptography · Crypto inventory · Wave 3

Daneyên demdirêj di xeterê deGCRI · Teknolojiyên kuantûmê

Koçberî

  1. Envanterhemû krîpto
  2. Pêşîn biketemenê daneyê
  3. Hilbijêrealgorîtmayên standard
  4. Bicihkirina hîbrîdklasîk û PQC
  5. Ceribandinhevgirtî
  6. Veguhestinteqawît bike

Pergal li gorî pêşînî

Îmzekirina arşîvêRSA-204829ML-DSA hîbrîdPilotkirin
Dergehê VPNECDH8ML-KEM hîbrîdPlankirî
HSM ya dayînêRSA-307211Nexşeya rê ya pêşkêşkerHatiye asteng kirin
Web TLSECDHE2Danûstendina kilîtan a hîbrîdQediya

Pêşveçûn

Hatiye envanterkirin, %74 of 100 requiredHîbrîd hatiye bicihkirin, %19 of 50 requiredHatiye teqawîtkirin, %5 of 25 required
Post-quantum migration tracker: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Post quantum cryptography.Nav û nirxên nimûneyî; sêwiran e, ne qeyd an pergaleke zindî ye.
04Li seranserê qadan

Every domain that keeps secrets for decades must migrate.

05Rêbaz û delîl

How post quantum cryptography is modelled, measured and tested.

Model, texmînên wî, daneyên wî û nediyariya wî, bi şeweyê ku zanyar an endezyar kontrol bike. Avahî rêbazên weşandî dişopînin. Nirxên hatine xêzkirin nimûneyî ne, ne encam in.

Modela pergalê

The couplings between the systems in post quantum cryptography: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−+KuantûmSîberCivakAborîR xurtkerB hevseng
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
Prensîbên rêber ên FAIR · GO FAIR û FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumRêwerzên ji bo birêvebirina hevgirtî ya nediyarîyan · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
06Nîşander

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeNîşan
Standardised post-quantum algorithmscountper standard releaseNIST and other standards bodiesStatîstîkên weşandî
Protocols with post-quantum support specifiedcountper assessmentIETF and other standardsStatîstîkên weşandî
Web traffic using post-quantum key agreementpercent of connectionsmonthlyNetwork measurementsÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ
Organisations with migration planspercent of surveyed organisationsper surveySurveysREPORTED
Cryptanalysis results against candidate schemescount of significant attacksper reviewCryptographic literatureREPORTED
Validated implementationscountannualCryptographic module validation listsStatîstîkên weşandî
07Çavkanî

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

ÇavkanîWhat it givesLicence class
NIST post-quantum cryptography project and FIPS 203, 204 and 205Standards, documentation and additional selectionsPublic domain, US government
IETF post-quantum and hybrid protocol workIntegration into TLS, SSH and other protocolsOpen, IETF Trust terms
National cyber agency migration guidanceTimelines and prioritiesPublic, terms per agency
Open Quantum Safe projectOpen-source implementations for testingOpen source, MIT licence
Cloudflare Radar and similar measurementsAdoption in web trafficPublic, terms per provider (to check)
08Biryar

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Quantum Technologies prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Kî biryarê dideThe questionEvidence this page serves
Organisations and security teamsKîjan pergalan to migrate first and howPlanning guides; performance comparisons
Standards bodiesWhich algorithms and parameters to standardiseCryptanalysis evidence
VendorsWhen and how to ship post-quantum supportAdoption and protocol evidence

Outputs this topic produces

  • Migration planning guides with inventory and prioritisation steps
  • Performance comparisons of standard algorithms
  • Adoption tracking summaries
  • Evidence notes on cryptanalysis of new schemes
09Core questions

What experts ask.

Migration questions start with an inventory.

  • Where does an organisation use public-key cryptography, in which pergalan, protocols, devices and suppliers?
  • Which data must remain confidential long enough to be at risk from future decryption?
  • Which post-quantum algorithms are standardised, and what are their performance and size trade-offs?
  • Should systems combine classical and post-quantum algorithms during the transition?
  • Can systems change algorithms easily in future, a property known as crypto-agility?
10Mechanisms

Mechanisms and drivers.

Today’s public-key cryptography rests on mathematical problems, such as factoring large numbers, that are hard for classical computers but could be solved efficiently by a large quantum computer running known algorithms. Symmetric encryption and hash functions are much less affected and can be strengthened by using longer keys. The urgent problem is therefore key exchange and digital signatures.

Two pressures drive timing. The harvest-now, decrypt-later threat means confidential data intercepted today could be read once a capable machine exists. Migration time is long: cryptography is embedded in hardware, firmware, protocols and supply chains, and some devices stay in service for decades. If the time data must stay secret plus the time migration takes exceeds the time until a capable quantum computer exists, data is already at risk.

11Methods and data

How it is studied, and where the methods stop.

Method or dataWhat it showsSînor
Cryptographic inventory and discovery toolsWhere vulnerable algorithms are usedEmbedded and third-party cryptography is easily missed
Cryptanalysis of candidate algorithmsConfidence in algorithm securityNew algorithms have less analysis history; some candidates were broken during evaluation
Performance and interoperability testingKey sizes, speed and protocol fitResults vary with hardware and implementation
Risk-based migration planningPriorities by data lifetime and system criticalityDepends on uncertain quantum timelines
12Rêbaz

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

  1. Ewlehiya sîber û kriptografîCryptographic inventory · Migration prioritisation · QKD implementation reviewApplied here
  2. Hesabkirina kuantûmê, hestkirin û ragihandinComparable benchmarking · Technology readiness assessment · Security implications trackingApplied here
  3. Îhtîmal û statîstîkFidelity estimation · Testing advantage claims · Analysing patent and investment dataApplied here
13Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

Sazî û belgeyên ku ev rûpel li hember wan tê xwendin. Rewş û çap diguherin; her girêdan diçe ba saziya derxistinê.

15Pirs

Pirs û bersiv.

What did NIST standardise?
In FIPS 203, 204 and 205, a lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism (ML-KEM), a lattice-based signature (ML-DSA) and a hash-based signature (SLH-DSA), with further algorithms in progress.
Is post-quantum cryptography quantum technology?
No. It runs on ordinary computers. It is designed to resist attacks by quantum computers.
Why use hybrid schemes?
Because combining classical and post-quantum algorithms keeps a connection secure if either is later found weak, hedging the risk of new schemes.
Do we need quantum computers to use post-quantum cryptography?
No. Post-quantum algorithms run on ordinary computers and devices. They are designed to be hard to break even for a future quantum computer.
What is a hybrid approach?
Combining a classical and a post-quantum algorithm so that security holds if either remains unbroken. It is used by some during the transition while confidence in new algorithms grows.
Is the platform’s Universe mission theme on migration readiness active?
The registry lists post-quantum migration readiness as a candidate mission theme for this platform. Mission selection is decided by The Global Risks Forum (GRF) within its instruments, and nothing is active until it is on the record.
rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkTevkarî bike

Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.

rêzeya Pergalên Stratejîk is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRITeknolojiyên kuantûmêTeknolojiya eksponensiyelPerspektîfa pêşdîtinê
Teknolojiyên kuantûmê

Rêbazek, danehevek an pirsek bîne.

Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.