G-P13 · TOPIC · biological-threatsGCRI dossier · service level R0
GCRIBiotechnology and BiosecurityIn development
Topic · Biotechnology and Biosecurity

Biological threats

Biological threats include naturally emerging diseases, accidental releases from laboratories or facilities, and deliberate misuse. Each has different origins but similar consequences once an agent spreads. This topic, studied at Biotechnology and Biosecurity, a platform of The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), examines how biological risks arise, how they are assessed and how preparedness reduces their consequences. It works at the level of systems and governance, never technical detail.

01In brief

The short answer.

Biological threats are the risks of harm from natural outbreaks, laboratory accidents and deliberate misuse of biological agents. This page covers the capacities that reduce them: surveillance and early detection, laboratory biosafety and biosecurity, preparedness under the International Health Regulations and the norms of the Biological Weapons Convention. It describes capacity and oversight only, with no technical detail.

02Geography

Environmental exposure in West Africa.

For biological threats, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on crop greenness, population density, daytime surface heat and true-colour imagery, framed on West Africa; 2 further NASA layers wait in the list.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 4

Environmental exposure, for this page

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

For biological threats, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on crop greenness, population density, daytime surface heat and true-colour imagery, framed on West Africa; 2 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · Copernicus Sentinel-2 L2ASources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • MODIS land products (vegetation indices, gross primary production, land cover), NASA LP DAAC and LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Globe: MapLibre GL JS 6.9.1, BSD-3-Clause, © MapLibre contributors.
  • Observed (EO): Copernicus Sentinel-2 L2A (contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026), Microsoft Planetary Computer
  • Optional layers (14 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Vegetation greenness (NDVI), rolling 8 days: MODIS Terra NDVI, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Land surface temperature, day, 8-day composite: VIIRS NOAA-20 Level 3, 8-day, NASA LANCE · 14 Sep 2026
  • Land cover type (IGBP), yearly: MODIS Terra and Aqua land cover (MCD12Q1), NASA LP DAAC · 2024
  • Gross primary production, 8-day total: MODIS Aqua GPP (MYD17), NASA LP DAAC · 30 Sep 2026
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026

03Console

Oversight and capacity register, in outline.

The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.

Oversight and capacity register

Biological threats · National committee · Review year 1

  • Institutions with a committee, %
    86Watch
  • Staff trained, %
    67Normal
  • Reviews completed
    50this year
  • Incident reports filed
    3Info
Capacity and oversight onlyGCRI · Biotechnology and Biosecurity

Institutional oversight

Institution AActiveQ387Current
Research campusActiveQ387Audit due
Biomanufacturing siteFormingnone60Support
Diagnostic networkActiveQ391Current

Scope note

Covers
governance, training, review capacity
Excludes
technical methods and agents
Authority
national oversight body
Label
SURVEY
Oversight and capacity register: the screen's structure, terms and states for Biological threats.Placeholder names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04Core questions

What experts ask.

  • How is the overall level of biological risk assessed when events are rare and uncertain?
  • What drives the emergence of new infectious diseases?
  • How can accidental releases be reduced without halting essential research?
  • How do detection, attribution and response capacities interact?
  • Which preparedness investments reduce consequences across many kinds of threat?
05Mechanisms

Drivers and dynamics.

Natural emergence is driven by contact between people, animals and environments: land-use change, wildlife trade, intensive livestock production and travel all increase opportunities for pathogens to cross between species and spread. Accidental releases arise from failures of containment, procedure or equipment, and from human error. Deliberate threats depend on intent and capability, both of which are shaped by access to materials, knowledge and equipment.

Consequences depend heavily on preparedness: surveillance that detects events early, laboratory capacity to identify agents, public health systems able to respond, and supplies of countermeasures. Many of these capacities protect against all kinds of biological threat, regardless of origin. The platform works at the level of governance, evaluation and risk methods. It publishes no protocols, techniques or information that would increase anyone's capacity to cause harm.

06Methods and limits

How it is studied.

  1. 01

    Epidemiological modelling

    Transmission models from epidemiology and public health science explore how outbreaks could spread under different conditions.

  2. 02

    Risk assessment under uncertainty

    Expert elicitation and scenario analysis, with uncertainty expressed through probability and statistics.

  3. 03

    Preparedness assessment

    Frameworks compare detection, response and recovery capacities across systems.

  4. 04

    Limits

    Rare events give little data, models depend on assumptions about behaviour and policy, and information about deliberate threats must be handled with great care.

07Key terms

Terms used on this page.

Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.

TermDefinition
BiosecurityMeasures that prevent the loss, theft, misuse or deliberate release of pathogens and toxins.
International Health RegulationsThe legally binding WHO instrument that sets countries' duties to detect, assess, report and respond to public health events of international concern.
Public health surveillanceThe continuous, systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of health data to plan and evaluate public health action.
Biological Weapons ConventionThe treaty that prohibits States Parties from developing, producing, acquiring, transferring, stockpiling or using biological agents and toxins as weapons, with confidence-building measures to support compliance.
08Decisions

What it informs and who decides.

This evidence informs preparedness planning, surveillance investment, research oversight and international cooperation. Health agencies, governments and international health bodies decide under their own mandates and instruments. Governance dialogue is convened by Health and Biosecurity Governance at The Global Risks Forum (GRF), and a biosecurity readiness drill is the platform's planned Nexus Universe theme. Related topics are One Health impacts, laboratory biosafety and biosecurity and dual use and ethics; methods sit on epidemiology and public health science and probability and statistics.

Published analysis on this topic is designed to carry a named subject reviewer, its references and the views of independent specialists, including biosafety professionals and those who disagree.

09Questions

Questions and answers.

Why consider natural, accidental and deliberate threats together?
Because their consequences, and many of the capacities that reduce them, are similar regardless of origin.
Does the platform assess specific agents or actors?
No. It works at the level of systems and governance, without information that could increase capacity for harm.
Can biological risk be measured precisely?
No. Assessments carry wide uncertainty, which published work states openly.
Who reviews coverage of this topic?
Published analysis is designed to be reviewed by a named subject reviewer with relevant expertise, to cite its references and to include independent specialist voices. Where specialists disagree, the disagreement is reported rather than resolved by omission.
Biotechnology and Biosecurity

Bring your expertise to this field.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.