GCRI · Quantum Technologies

Cryptography and quantum

Cybersecurity and cryptography meet quantum technology in two ways: quantum computers threaten current public-key cryptography, and quantum key distribution offers a different way to share keys. In this field the work is planning the move to post-quantum cryptography and weighing QKD honestly.

02Application

What cybersecurity and cryptography does here.

Cybersecurity and cryptography protect information systems and data from unauthorised access, disruption and manipulation. They address threats that can spread rapidly across interconnected digital and physical systems. In quantum and cyber and digital resilience, cybersecurity analysis identifies how a single compromise can propagate across sectors that share software, vendors or networks. It informs resilience requirements and cyber insurance. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Cryptographic inventory

Systems, protocols and certificates using vulnerable public-key algorithms are discovered and recorded, as the first step of migration.

Migration prioritisation

Systems are prioritised by how long their data must stay secret and how long migration will take, compared with threat timeline ranges.

QKD implementation review

QKD deployments are reviewed for trusted node exposure, device evaluation and fit with agency guidance.

03Monitor

Security assessment.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Security assessment

Quantum technologies · Cryptography and quantum · Run R-0897

Two high findingsGCRI · Quantum Technologies

Findings

Weak key rotationIdentity serviceHighPR.AAOpen
Unpatched gatewayEdgeHighPR.PSFixing
Logging gapPayments APIMediumDE.CMOpen
Stale accountsDirectoryLowPR.AAClosed

Method card

Method
Cybersecurity and cryptography
Framework
CSF 2.0 functions
Scope
60 assets
Label
MODELLED

Control coverage by function

Security assessment: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Quantum technologies.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04Data

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by cybersecurity and cryptography on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DataRoleLabel
Cryptographic discovery outputsInventoryOBSERVED
Data classificationLifetime of secrecyDECLARED
Agency guidancePositionsPublished statistics
05Simulator

A cascade through interdependent networks.

A hazard footprint takes out co-located assets in every layer; fragmentation, dependency between layers and overload of the survivors then spread the failure. The 3D view separates the layers by depth. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction.

Controls

Assets per layer
18
Hazard footprint
8% of area
Assets that depend on another layer
60%
Spare capacity (tolerance)
30%

Readouts

Assets hit by the hazard
13%
Assets still working
44%
Amplification of the initial damage
4.3 times
Steps to settle
2
Numbers, methods and sources
StepData centres working (%)Networks working (%)Power working (%)
0838989
1617267
2613339

Methods

  1. Interdependent networks Buldyrev and others (2010), Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464
  2. Overload cascades Motter and Lai (2002), Physical Review E 66
  3. Betweenness load Brandes (2001), Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25
  4. Multilayer networks Kivela and others (2014), Journal of Complex Networks 2
  5. Infrastructure interdependencies Rinaldi, Peerenboom and Kelly (2001), IEEE Control Systems 21(6)
  6. Uncertainty fan (parameter Monte Carlo) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  7. One-at-a-time sensitivity (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Major roads Natural Earth
  • Railways Natural Earth
  • Seaports Natural Earth
  • Airports Natural Earth
  • Urban extents Natural Earth
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band) NASA/NOAA VIIRS (Suomi NPP) · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • Natural events (NASA EONET) NASA EONET · register nasa.eonet.events
A cascade through interdependent networks. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: Interdependent networks (Buldyrev and others (2010), Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464); Overload cascades (Motter and Lai (2002), Physical Review E 66); Betweenness load (Brandes (2001), Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25).
06Validation

How results are checked.

Controls are tested through red-team exercises, audits and formal analysis of cryptographic schemes. Incident data are used to check whether defences performed as intended.

CheckHow it is done
Inventory completenessDiscovery is checked against architecture documentation
Interoperability testingPost-quantum implementations are tested with partners
Agency alignmentPlans are compared with national agency timelines

Adversaries adapt, so historical data may not reflect future attacks. Software supply chains and legacy systems introduce weaknesses that are hard to inventory.

07Methods and evidence

How cryptography and quantum is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

System model

The couplings between the systems in cryptography and quantum: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−+QuantumCyberCommunitiesEconomyR reinforcingB balancing
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
09Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience stewards cybersecurity and cryptography for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Questions

Questions and answers.

What are the limits of cybersecurity and cryptography in this field?
Adversaries adapt, so historical data may not reflect future attacks. Software supply chains and legacy systems introduce weaknesses that are hard to inventory.
How are results checked?
Controls are tested through red-team exercises, audits and formal analysis of cryptographic schemes. Incident data are used to check whether defences performed as intended.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
The canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIQuantum TechnologiesExponential TechnologyForesight Outlook
Quantum Technologies

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.