GCRI · Bioteknologi dan Biosekuriti
Penggunaan ganda dan etika
Much life sciences research is dual use: knowledge, materials and technologies developed for beneficial purposes could also be misused to cause harm. This topic, studied at Biotechnology and Biosecurity, a platform of The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), examines how research of concern is identified, how responsibility is shared between researchers, institutions, funders and publishers, and how concerns are escalated, alongside the wider ethical questions biotechnology raises.
Dual use and ethics in six parts.
Apa yang ditanyakan pakar.
- How can research of concern be identified early, without discouraging beneficial science?
- What responsibilities do researchers, institutions, funders and publishers each hold?
- How should concerns be raised and escalated, and how are those who raise them protected?
- How should the publication of sensitive findings be handled?
- How do ethical questions of consent, equity and benefit sharing apply to biotechnology?
Register pengawasan dan kapasitas.
Layar yang akan digunakan sebuah tim untuk mengikuti subjek ini: ukuran, status, dan keputusannya. Nama adalah contoh dan nilai bersifat ilustratif.
Register pengawasan dan kapasitas
Dual use and ethics · National committee · Review year 2
- Lembaga dengan komite, %61Pantau
- Staf terlatih, %64Normal
- Tinjauan selesai55tahun ini
- Laporan insiden diajukan13Info
Pengawasan kelembagaan
| Lembaga A | Aktif | Q4 | 87 | Terkini |
| Kampus riset | Aktif | Q4 | 82 | Audit jatuh tempo |
| Lokasi biomanufaktur | Sedang dibentuk | tidak ada | 46 | Dukungan |
| Jaringan diagnostik | Aktif | Q3 | 81 | Terkini |
Catatan cakupan
- Mencakup
- tata kelola, pelatihan, kapasitas tinjauan
- Tidak mencakup
- metode teknis dan agen
- Otoritas
- badan pengawas nasional
- Label
- SURVEY
Dual-use governance applies wherever life-science research touches the domains.
- KesehatanKeterkaitanResearch on pathogens carries dual-use risk.What to watchReview processes
- PanganKeterkaitanPlant and animal pathogen research carries it too.What to watchOversight coverage
- Keanekaragaman hayatiKeterkaitanOpenness of sequence data must be balanced against risk.What to watchData access policies
Governance analyses are designed for the seri Teknologi Eksponensial. The WHO framework (2022) and the Biological Weapons Convention set the frame; GCRI publishes governance analysis, never methods of concern.
- Governance comparisons.
- Ethics review lessons.
How dual use and ethics is modelled, measured and tested.
Model, asumsi, data, dan ketidakpastiannya, dalam bentuk yang akan diperiksa ilmuwan atau insinyur. Strukturnya mengikuti metode yang dipublikasikan. Nilai yang digambar bersifat ilustratif, bukan temuan.
Pita ketidakpastian
How far the outlook for dual use and ethics could spread, shown as ranges rather than a single line.
- Estimasi tengah
- median ansambel
- Rentang
- mungkin dan sangat mungkin, dalam bahasa terkalibrasi IPCC
- Ansambel
- anggota, skenario, dan kondisi awal dinyatakan
- Baca bersama
- sensitivitas hasil terhadap setiap masukan
Pendorong dan dinamika.
Dual-use concerns arise because the same experiments that reveal how biological sistem work can, in rare cases, produce knowledge or materials that could be misused. Policies in several countries define categories of research that require additional review, and funders and journals have developed processes for assessing sensitive work. These processes depend heavily on the judgement and awareness of researchers themselves.
Ethics in biotechnology extends beyond misuse: consent for the use of genetic data, equitable access to benefits, fair sharing of benefits from genetic resources, and respect for communities and ecosystems. A culture of responsibility, in which researchers consider consequences and feel able to raise concerns, is widely regarded as the foundation of effective governance. The platform works at the level of governance, evaluation and risk methods. It publishes no protocols, techniques or information that would increase anyone’s capacity to cause harm.
How it is studied.
- 01
Policy analysis
Comparative studies of dual-use review policies, funder conditions and publication practices.
- 02
Ethics frameworks
Structured approaches for weighing benefits, risks and responsibilities in research decisions.
- 03
Education research
Studies of how training and culture influence awareness and reporting.
- 04
Batasan
Misuse potential is hard to judge in advance, review processes vary in rigour, and discussions of risk must avoid creating the hazards they seek to prevent.
What it informs and who decides.
This evidence informs institutional review processes, funder and publisher policies, training and national oversight frameworks. Researchers, institutional review committees, funders, publishers and regulators decide within their roles. Governance dialogue is convened by Tata Kelola Kesehatan dan Biosekuriti di The Global Risks Forum (GRF). Concerns can be raised through koreksi dan keberatan. Related topics are keamanan hayati dan biosekuriti laboratorium, synthetic biology and biological threats; methods sit on molecular and life sciences.
Published analysis on this topic is designed to carry a named subject reviewer, its references and the views of independent specialists, including biosafety professionals and those who disagree.
Where this page’s references lead.
Badan dan dokumen yang menjadi acuan halaman ini. Status dan edisi berubah; setiap tautan menuju badan penerbitnya.
Tanya jawab.
Does dual use mean research should stop?
Who is responsible for identifying research of concern?
How can I raise a concern about research?
Siapa yang meninjau liputan topik ini?
Kontribusikan bukti dari halaman ini.
Laporan is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- SurelGerbang GW-GCRIKirim dari halaman iniBukti, koreksi, kasus, metode, tinjauan, terjemahan, atau masukan profil. Kiriman tiba dengan label halaman ini, sehingga editor pemiliknya menerimanya.
- ZenodoDeposit terbukaDeposit dan ajukan ke komunitasTerbitkan catatan Anda sendiri di Zenodo dengan ORCID iD Anda, lalu ajukan ke komunitas Reports di sana. Kurator meninjaunya; DOI tetap milik Anda.
- LaporanGCRILihat semua cara berkontribusiJenis kontribusi, cara masing-masing ditinjau, kredit yang Anda terima, lisensinya, dan apa yang tidak pernah diterima.
Jangan pernah mengirim data pribadi, rincian infrastruktur sensitif, atau apa pun yang tidak berhak Anda bagikan. Kontribusi ditinjau sebelum digunakan. Mengirimkannya tidak memberikan hak kepenulisan atau editorial, dan sponsor tidak pernah membeli sebuah temuan.
Bawa metode, dataset, atau pertanyaan.
Informasi dan pertanyaan sudah terbuka hari ini. Sebuah pertanyaan menerima nomor referensi dan menyebutkan langkah berikutnya; lamaran, pembayaran, alokasi komputasi, dan pendaftaran hanya dibuka ketika tim, ketentuan, dan kapasitas tinjauannya tersedia.
Dokumen hukum.
Peta, data, dan gambar di situs ini ditampilkan untuk konteks dan informasi umum. Semua itu bukan nasihat, prakiraan, atau peringatan; batasan informasinya dijelaskan dalam Penafian dan Pemberitahuan Data.