Disaster Resilience and Recovery
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
The research behind Disaster Resilience and Recovery: the questions it asks, the methods it uses and how evidence is reviewed before it is published.
Fig.How a finding is reviewed before it is published. Design, not a record.
Disaster Resilience and Recovery research is the evidence work behind the platform: questions such as risk reduction policy and preparedness and continuity, answered with decision analysis under uncertainty as well as social and behavioural science and reviewed before publication. Every result carries an evidence label, from observed to modelled or expert judgement, and missing data is shown as missing, never filled silently.
For research and evidence, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on true-colour imagery, land cover and flood water, framed on the Philippines; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
Hazards now, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For research and evidence, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on true-colour imagery, land cover and flood water, framed on the Philippines; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Prevention and risk-informed development.
Organizational capacity and continuity.
Warnings, communication and last-mile issues.
Triggers, lead times and action limits.
Safer rebuilding and recovery choices.
Direct and indirect loss methods.
Disaster research has moved from response to the whole cycle of risk. The agenda follows the points where evidence is weakest: loss accounting, anticipatory action, and recovery that does not rebuild the same risk.
Results are labelled as observed, officially reported, estimated, modelled, forecast, scenario or expert judgement. Missing data is shown as missing, never filled silently.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Research integrity | Conduct of research in line with principles of reliability, honesty, respect and accountability, as the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity sets them out. |
| Evidence label | A tag on an assertion naming the kind of evidence behind it, such as observed, officially reported or modelled. |
| Reproducibility | Obtaining consistent results using the same data and analysis code as the original study. |
| Contingency plan | A plan prepared in advance for a specific hazard or scenario, setting roles, resources and actions. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.