GCRI · Campaigns

Decision analysis for risk communication

Decision analysis under uncertainty structures the choices communicators and the authorities they serve must make: whether to speak before evidence settles, which audiences and channels to prioritise, and when to adapt or end a campaign. It makes trade-offs between reach, equity, cost and the risk of harm explicit and open to scrutiny.

01تۆمارکردن

Decision analysis for risk communication on the record.

Method recordSTEM method
  1. ڕێگاشیکاری بڕیار لە ژێر نادڵنیاییدا
  2. Applied inهەڵمەتەکان
  3. داتا4 inputs
  4. Canonical pageSTEM Commons
02Application

What decision analysis under uncertainty does here.

Decision analysis under uncertainty provides structured methods for choosing among options when outcomes are uncertain and objectives conflict. It makes trade-offs and value judgements explicit. In information and public trust and society and human development, decision analysis helps choose actions that perform acceptably across interconnected risks and uncertain futures. It clarifies when to act now and when to keep options open. The canonical description is on STEM Commons.

Communicating before the evidence settles

Early communication with stated uncertainty is weighed against waiting for better evidence, using value-of-information reasoning and the risks of silence, so the timing choice and its assumptions are on record.

Choosing channels and audiences

Options are scored against reach, accessibility, equity, cost and risk of harm, with weights elicited from stakeholders, and the ranking is tested for sensitivity to those weights.

Adapt, continue or end

Decision points are set in advance with the evidence that would trigger adapting, continuing or ending a campaign, so later choices are not driven by sunk costs or favourable metrics alone.

03چاودێری

Uncertainty analysis.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Uncertainty analysis

Campaigns · Decision analysis for risk · Run R-2791

Sensitivity rankedGCRI · Campaigns

Total-order sensitivity

Output distribution

تێکردنەکان

خەڵکی گەیشتووLognormalpeople, statedدەرهێنانی ڕای شارەزا
Knowledge gainئاساییscore change, statedدەرهێنانی ڕای شارەزا
Consent records completeLognormal of participants, statedدەرهێنانی ڕای شارەزا
Preparedness actions takenBeta of households, statedدەرهێنانی ڕای شارەزا
Uncertainty analysis: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Campaigns.ناو و بەهای نموونەیی؛ دیزاینێکە، نەک تۆمار یان سیستەمی ڕاستەوخۆ.
04داتا

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by decision analysis under uncertainty on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

داتاڕۆڵناونیشان
Expert elicitation recordsJudgements where data are thinمەزەندەکراو
Stakeholder preference surveysWeights on criteria such as reach, equity and costREPORTED
Pre-test and evaluation resultsEvidence on how options performچاودێریکراو
Budget and resource recordsWhat each option requiresئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
05ئەنجامدەر

مۆدێلێکی ئاستە بۆ ڕەفتاری بەکۆمەڵ.

هەر ئەیجێنتێک کار دەکات کاتێک پەیوەندییەکانی بەشی پێویست کاریان کردبێت؛ گۆڕانی بچووک لە ئاستی تێکڕا یان جووڵەکەرە پێشەنگەکان یەکلا دەکەنەوە کە ڕەفتارەکە ناوخۆیی دەمێنێتەوە یان بەناو دانیشتواندا زنجیرە دەکات. مۆدێلی فێرکاری بە بەهای نموونەیی ڕاگەیەندراو، نەک پێشبینی.

کۆنترۆڵەکان

ئاستی تێکڕا (بەشی دراوسێکان)
18%
بڵاوبوونەوەی ئاستەکان
8 خاڵ
پێشەنگەکان
2.0% ی خەڵک
پەیوەندی بۆ هەر کەسێک
8

خوێندنەوەکان

بەشی ئەوانەی لە کۆتاییدا کاریان کرد
100%
زنجیرەی کاریگەریی جیهانی
بەڵێ
هەنگاوەکانی یەکلاکردنەوە
10
ژمارە، ڕێگا و سەرچاوەکان
هەنگاوبەشی ئەوانەی کاریان کردووە (%)
02.0
18.0
222.5
340.0
455.8
569.8
683.0
792.5
897.5
9100.0
10100.0

میتۆدەکان

  1. مۆدێلەکانی ئاستی ڕەفتاری بەکۆمەڵ Granovetter (1978)، American Journal of Sociology 83
  2. زنجیرەی کاریگەریی جیهانی لەسەر تۆڕی هەڕەمەکی Watts (2002)، PNAS 99
  3. پەرەسەندنی ئاڵۆز Centola و Macy (2007)، American Journal of Sociology 113
  4. هەستیاریی یەک-یەک (تۆرناد) Saltelli و ئەوانی دیکە (2008)، Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer، Wiley

داتا

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

مۆدێلی ئاستێک بۆ ڕەفتاری بەکۆمەڵ. مۆدێلی فێرکاریی نموونەیی: لەسەر ئەو بەهایانە کار دەکات کە کۆنترۆڵەکان دایاندەنێن، نەک داتای پێوراو. ڕێگاکان: مۆدێلی ئاستی ڕەفتاری بەکۆمەڵ (Granovetter (1978)، American Journal of Sociology 83)؛ زنجیرەی کاریگەریی جیهانی لەسەر تۆڕی هەڕەمەکی (Watts (2002)، PNAS 99)؛ پەرەسەندنی ئاڵۆز (Centola و Macy (2007)، American Journal of Sociology 113).

لە ناو شەش کۆڵەکەکەدا، بە سەرپەرشتیی Nexus Consortium

06پشتڕاستکردنەوە

How results are checked.

Analyses are checked through sensitivity analysis, peer review and stakeholder scrutiny. Retrospective review compares decisions with outcomes.

بپشکنەHow it is done
شیکاری هەستیاریWeights and probabilities are varied to show which of them drive the choice
Explicit value judgementsEach criterion and weight is recorded with who set it and why
Robustness across scenariosOptions are tested against several plausible futures, not one expected case
Retrospective reviewDecisions are compared with what followed, separating the quality of the judgement from the luck of the outcome

Results depend on elicited probabilities and preferences that may be biased. Deep uncertainty can make expected value comparisons misleading.

07ڕێگا و بەڵگە

How decision analysis for risk communication is modelled, measured and tested.

مۆدێلەکە، گریمانەکانی، داتاکانی و نادڵنیاییەکەی، بەو شێوەیەی زانا یان ئەندازیارێک دەیپشکنێت. پێکهاتەکان ڕێگا بڵاوکراوەکان دەگرنەبەر. بەهاکانی کێشراو نموونەییە، نەک دۆزینەوە.

مۆدێلی سیستەم

The couplings between the systems in decision analysis for risk communication: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−+زانیاریکۆمەڵگاکۆمەڵگە خۆجێییەکانئابووریR بەهێزکەرB هاوسەنگ
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
پرەنسیپە ڕێنماییەکانی FAIR · GO FAIR و FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web Consortiumڕێنمایی بۆ مامەڵەی یەکسان لەگەڵ نادڵنیاییەکان · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
09Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

بەڕێوەبردنی مەترسیی سیستەمی stewards decision analysis under uncertainty for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

10پەیوەست

ئەو شوێنانەی ئەم لاپەڕەیە لە ناو کۆنسۆرتیۆم بۆیان دەبات.

11پرسیارەکان

پرسیار و وەڵام.

What are the limits of decision analysis under uncertainty in this field?
Results depend on elicited probabilities and preferences that may be biased. Deep uncertainty can make expected value comparisons misleading.
How are results checked?
Analyses are checked through sensitivity analysis, peer review and stakeholder scrutiny. Retrospective review compares decisions with outcomes.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
ئەو canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
Reportsبەشداربە

لەم لاپەڕەیەوە بەڵگە پێشکەش بکە.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIهەڵمەتەکانکورتەی بەڵگە
هەڵمەتەکان

ڕێگایەک، کۆمەڵە داتایەک یان پرسیارێک بهێنە.

زانیاری و پرسیار ئەمڕۆ کراوەن. پرسیارێک ژمارەی ئاماژەی پێدەدرێت و هەنگاوی دواتر دیاری دەکات؛ داواکاری، پارەدان، تەرخانکردنی کۆمپیوتەر و تۆمارکردن تەنیا کاتێک دەکرێنەوە کە تیم، مەرج و توانای پێداچوونەوەیان هەبێت.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.