GCRI · Registry

سجلات المشاركة

Participation records name the people and organisations involved in a programme or a work: contributors, participants, partners and reviewers. They carry recognition, but also obligations, because naming someone discloses something about them. This page sets out how consent is recorded and honoured, how contributions are credited with standard roles and identifiers, how programme boundaries are stated, and what happens when consent is withdrawn or attribution is disputed.

02السؤال

Participation records: how the risk develops.

Consent, recognition and programme boundaries. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

الآلية

Consent scope creep

Consent is given for one purpose, such as listing in a programme, and the record is later reused for another, such as publicity, analytics or a partner directory. Without the scope recorded beside the name, reuse quietly exceeds what the person agreed to.

الآلية

Identity collision

Two contributors with similar names are merged, or one person appears as several. Credit goes to the wrong person, a withdrawal request misses some records, and a disclosure meant for one person reaches another.

الآلية

Boundary blur

A partner named in one project is listed as a member of the whole programme, or an adviser appears as an endorser. Readers infer affiliation, endorsement or responsibility that no one agreed to.

الآلية

Withdrawal does not propagate

A person withdraws consent and the primary record is updated, but exports, caches, partner copies and search indexes still carry the name. The harm the withdrawal was meant to prevent continues downstream.

03الأساليب والأدلة

How participation records is modelled, measured and tested.

النموذج وافتراضاته وبياناته وعدم اليقين فيه، بالصورة التي يفحصها بها عالم أو مهندس. وتتبع البنى أساليب منشورة. والقيم المرسومة توضيحية، وليست نتائج.

مجموعات البيانات وبيان المصدر

The data classes behind participation records and what is recorded about each before it is used.

فئة البياناتبيان المصدر مسجلالدقة معلنةالترخيص مفحوص
صور الأقمار الاصطناعية، البصرية والراداريةالمستشعر، مستوى المعالجة، تاريخ الاقتناءحجم البكسل وإعادة الزيارةلكل مشهد
إعادة التحليل ومخرجات النماذج المناخيةالنموذج، التجربة، العضو، الإصدارالشبكة والخطوة الزمنيةلكل إصدار
المستشعرات والمقاييس الميدانيةالمحطة، الجهاز، سجل المعايرةالنقطة ومعدل أخذ العيناتلكل شبكة
التعرض لدى السكان والأصولالأسلوب، سنة الإصدار، مصادر المدخلاتحجم الخلية والوحدةلكل إصدار
الحدود والجغرافيا المرجعيةالمنتج، الإصدار، التاريخالمقياسلكل إصدار
النسب
سجل ⁨W3C PROV⁩ من المصدر إلى الشكل
المبادئ
⁨FAIR⁩: قابلة للعثور، قابلة للوصول، قابلة للتشغيل البيني، قابلة لإعادة الاستخدام
الفجوات
يُعرض كمفقود، ولا يُملأ بصمت أبدا
فئات البيانات وحقول بيان المصدر المسجلة لكل منها؛ ولا تُدرج مجموعة بيانات بالاسم إلا بعد أن يسمح ترخيصها بالاستخدام.
مبادئ FAIR التوجيهية · GO FAIR وFORCE11⁨W3C PROV⁩ · اتحاد الشبكة العالميةإرشادات بشأن المعالجة المتسقة لأوجه عدم اليقين · الهيئة الحكومية الدولية المعنية بتغير المناخبيانات CEOS الجاهزة للتحليل · لجنة سواتل رصد الأرض
04In the five domains

Participation records show who took part in each domain’s work, and nothing more.

05المؤشرات الفرعية

ما الذي يُقاس، ومدى جودة قياسه.

يحمل كل مؤشر وحدته ووتيرته ونوع المصدر الذي يستند إليه ووسم الأدلة الذي ستحمله القيمة. ولا تُعرض أي قيم: فالبرنامج يقدّمها بموجب سلطته الخاصة.

المؤشرالوحدةوتيرة الإصدارنوع المصدرالوسم
Participation records with a current consent statusshare of records naming a personشهريConsent registerمُعلَن
Records with consent scope statedshare of records naming a personشهريSchema validationمرصود
Contributors with a persistent identifiershare of contributorsشهريIdentifier linkageمرصود
Contributions described with CRediT rolesshare of contributionsper outputContributor metadataمُعلَن
Records with a stated programme boundaryshare of participation recordsفصليSchema validationمرصود
Withdrawal requests completed within the policy periodshare of requestsفصليCase recordsمرصود
Attribution disputes raisedالعددفصليIntegrity office recordsREPORTED
06المصادر

من أين تأتي الأدلة.

مجموعات بيانات عامة مسمّاة وسجلات مؤسسية، لكلٍّ منها فئة ترخيصها. ولا تُستخدم المصادر المتاحة بموجب اتفاق إلا وفق شروطها، ولا يُعاد نشرها أبدًا.

المصدرما يقدّمهفئة الترخيص
CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104)Standard roles describing each contributor’s part in a research outputOpen standard, free to use
ORCID registryPersistent identifiers and consent-based connections between researchers and their recordsCC0 for the public data file
ROR (Research Organization Registry)Identifiers for partner organisations and their relationshipsCC0
W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV)Terms for purposes, legal bases, consent states and processing operationsW3C community licence, free to use
GA4GH Data Use OntologyMachine-readable terms for consent-based conditions on data useOpen ontology, attribution
ICMJE recommendationsCriteria for authorship and for acknowledging non-author contributorsFree to read
07القرارات

من يقرر، وما الذي تخدمه الأدلة.

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

من يقررالسؤالالأدلة التي تخدمها هذه الصفحة
Research ethics boardsWhether consent covers the proposed listing, reuse or disclosure of participantsRecorded consent scope, its date and the uses each record supports
Data protection officersWhether a lawful basis exists for processing and publishing personal data in a recordPurpose, legal basis, retention and withdrawal history for each record
Journal editors and research integrity officesHow to resolve an authorship or attribution disputeContributor roles, identifiers and the history of changes to the contributor list
Programme stewardsWho may be listed as a partner, member or contributor, and in what capacitySigned participation terms and the stated boundary of each role

المخرجات التي يُنتجها هذا الموضوع

  • Participation views showing each named party’s role, identifier and programme boundary
  • Consent status and scope recorded beside every personal name
  • A withdrawal route listing the records and known copies it reaches
  • Contributor role records using CRediT terms where they apply
08الأسئلة الجوهرية

What experts ask about participation records.

  • What consent is needed before a person or institution is named, and how is it withdrawn?
  • How should roles be described so that credit is accurate and comparable?
  • How can recognition be given without creating a credential or an employment record?
  • How much personal data does a participation record need?
  • How are institutional names protected from implied endorsement?
09الآليات

Where participation records go wrong.

Contribution records fail in predictable ways. Gift and honorary authorship overstate some contributions, while data collectors, community researchers and technical staff are often left out. Lists of participating institutions are read as partnerships or endorsements. Records collected for one purpose are reused for another without consent. Research communities have responded with contributor-role taxonomies that describe what each person actually did, and with persistent identifiers that people control themselves.

Data protection law and research ethics add a further rule: collect only what the purpose requires. Methods from الهوية الرقمية والنظم الرقمية العامة show how a person can be identified reliably while disclosing as little as possible.

10المناهج وحدودها

How the Registry approaches it.

  1. 01

    Consent first

    A person or institution is named only as they agreed, for the purpose they agreed, and consent can be withdrawn.

  2. 02

    Described roles

    Roles follow a published vocabulary of contribution types, never titles that imply authority.

  3. 03

    Minimal data

    Records hold the least personal data needed, and protected details stay out of public views.

  4. 04

    الحدود

    A participation record is not a licence, a qualification, an appointment or an employment record. Self-reported roles can be inaccurate, and recognition norms differ between disciplines and cultures.

11الأساليب

كيف يُدرس، وما لا تستطيع المناهج قوله.

12Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

الهيئات والوثائق التي تُقرأ هذه الصفحة في ضوئها. وتتغير الحالات والإصدارات؛ ويقود كل رابط إلى الهيئة المُصدِرة.

13أسئلة

أسئلة وأجوبة.

Can I be listed without my consent?
A person should not be named in a public participation record without a lawful basis, usually consent. Where another basis applies, such as published authorship, that basis is recorded beside the name.
What happens when I withdraw consent?
The record is updated or removed under the programme’s terms, the withdrawal is logged without restating the withdrawn details, and known downstream recipients are notified.
Why use CRediT roles rather than a plain contributor list?
Because a list does not say who did what. Standard roles let credit and responsibility be read precisely, and they travel with the record into registration metadata.
Does being listed as a partner mean endorsement?
No. A partner record states a defined role within a stated boundary. It does not imply endorsement of the whole programme unless the partner has recorded one explicitly.
Does a participation record make me a member or an employee?
No. It records a consented contribution or role within a programme’s boundaries, and nothing more.
Can I ask to be removed?
Yes. You can withdraw consent to be named in public views. See rights and disclosure and the Registry’s rights page.
Is an institution named in a record a partner?
Only if a current agreement says so and the institution has given permission. A listing alone never implies partnership or endorsement.
التقاريرساهم

ساهم بأدلة من هذه الصفحة.

التقارير is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIالسجلالأساليب والجوانب التقنية
السجل

قدّم منهجية أو مجموعة بيانات أو سؤالا.

المعلومات والاستفسارات متاحة اليوم. ويحصل الاستفسار على رقم مرجعي ويحدد الخطوة التالية؛ ولا تُفتح الطلبات والمدفوعات وتخصيصات الحوسبة والتسجيلات إلا حين يتوافر فريقها وشروطها وقدرة المراجعة.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.