GCRI · Registry
参加記録
Participation records name the people and organisations involved in a programme or a work: contributors, participants, partners and reviewers. They carry recognition, but also obligations, because naming someone discloses something about them. This page sets out how consent is recorded and honoured, how contributions are credited with standard roles and identifiers, how programme boundaries are stated, and what happens when consent is withdrawn or attribution is disputed.
Participation records on the record.
Participation records: how the risk develops.
Consent, recognition and programme boundaries. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Consent scope creep
Consent is given for one purpose, such as listing in a programme, and the record is later reused for another, such as publicity, analytics or a partner directory. Without the scope recorded beside the name, reuse quietly exceeds what the person agreed to.
Identity collision
Two contributors with similar names are merged, or one person appears as several. Credit goes to the wrong person, a withdrawal request misses some records, and a disclosure meant for one person reaches another.
Boundary blur
A partner named in one project is listed as a member of the whole programme, or an adviser appears as an endorser. Readers infer affiliation, endorsement or responsibility that no one agreed to.
Withdrawal does not propagate
A person withdraws consent and the primary record is updated, but exports, caches, partner copies and search indexes still carry the name. The harm the withdrawal was meant to prevent continues downstream.
How participation records is modelled, measured and tested.
モデル、その仮定、データ、不確実性を、科学者やエンジニアが確認する形で示します。構造は公表された手法に従っています。描かれた値は例示であり、知見ではありません。
データセットと来歴
The data classes behind participation records and what is recorded about each before it is used.
| データ区分 | 来歴を記録済み | 解像度を明示 | ライセンス確認済み |
|---|---|---|---|
| 衛星画像、光学とレーダー | センサー、処理レベル、取得日 | 画素サイズと再訪周期 | シーンごと |
| 再解析と気候モデルの出力 | モデル、実験、メンバー、バージョン | グリッドと時間ステップ | リリースごと |
| 現地センサーと計測器 | 観測所、機器、校正記録 | 地点とサンプリング・レート | ネットワークごと |
| 人口と資産のエクスポージャー | 手法、作成年、入力ソース | セルの大きさと単位 | リリースごと |
| 境界と参照地理 | 作成者、版、日付 | 縮尺 | 版ごと |
- 系譜
- 情報源から図までの W3C PROV 記録
- 原則
- FAIR：見つけやすく、アクセス可能で、相互運用でき、再利用できる
- ギャップ
- 欠損として表示し、黙って埋めることはしない
Participation records show who took part in each domain’s work, and nothing more.
- 水実際にはA utility that contributed data is recorded as a contributor, not a member.What a reader can checkRole recorded
- 健康実際にはExperts on a review panel are recorded with declared interests.What a reader can checkInterest declarations
- 生物多様性実際にはCommunities that shared knowledge are recorded with consent terms.What a reader can checkConsent and withdrawal
Participation records support the contributor roles printed in 報告書 (CRediT). Personal data in records follow the applicable privacy law.
- Requests to correct or withdraw a record.
- Questions about how a record is used.
何を、どの程度うまく測定しているか。
各指標には、その単位、更新頻度、背後にある出典の種類、値が持つことになるエビデンスのラベルが付いています。値は表示しません：プログラムが自らの権限のもとで値を提供します。
| 指標 | 単位 | 周期 | 出典の種類 | ラベル |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participation records with a current consent status | share of records naming a person | 月次 | Consent register | 申告済み |
| Records with consent scope stated | share of records naming a person | 月次 | Schema validation | 観測 |
| Contributors with a persistent identifier | share of contributors | 月次 | Identifier linkage | 観測 |
| Contributions described with CRediT roles | share of contributions | per output | Contributor metadata | 申告済み |
| Records with a stated programme boundary | share of participation records | 四半期ごと | Schema validation | 観測 |
| Withdrawal requests completed within the policy period | share of requests | 四半期ごと | Case records | 観測 |
| Attribution disputes raised | 件数 | 四半期ごと | Integrity office records | 報告値 |
エビデンスの出所。
名前の明示された公開データセットと機関の記録。それぞれにライセンス区分があります。合意に基づく出典は、その条件のもとでのみ使用し、再公開することはありません。
| 出典 | 提供するもの | ライセンス区分 |
|---|---|---|
| CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104) | Standard roles describing each contributor’s part in a research output | Open standard, free to use |
| ORCID registry | Persistent identifiers and consent-based connections between researchers and their records | CC0 for the public data file |
| ROR (Research Organization Registry) | Identifiers for partner organisations and their relationships | CC0 |
| W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) | Terms for purposes, legal bases, consent states and processing operations | W3C community licence, free to use |
| GA4GH Data Use Ontology | Machine-readable terms for consent-based conditions on data use | Open ontology, attribution |
| ICMJE recommendations | Criteria for authorship and for acknowledging non-author contributors | Free to read |
誰が決め、エビデンスが何に役立つか。
Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 誰が決定するか | 質問 | このページが提供するエビデンス |
|---|---|---|
| Research ethics boards | Whether consent covers the proposed listing, reuse or disclosure of participants | Recorded consent scope, its date and the uses each record supports |
| Data protection officers | Whether a lawful basis exists for processing and publishing personal data in a record | Purpose, legal basis, retention and withdrawal history for each record |
| Journal editors and research integrity offices | How to resolve an authorship or attribution dispute | Contributor roles, identifiers and the history of changes to the contributor list |
| Programme stewards | Who may be listed as a partner, member or contributor, and in what capacity | Signed participation terms and the stated boundary of each role |
このトピックが生み出す成果物
- Participation views showing each named party’s role, identifier and programme boundary
- Consent status and scope recorded beside every personal name
- A withdrawal route listing the records and known copies it reaches
- Contributor role records using CRediT terms where they apply
What experts ask about participation records.
- What consent is needed before a person or institution is named, and how is it withdrawn?
- How should roles be described so that credit is accurate and comparable?
- How can recognition be given without creating a credential or an employment record?
- How much personal data does a participation record need?
- How are institutional names protected from implied endorsement?
Where participation records go wrong.
Contribution records fail in predictable ways. Gift and honorary authorship overstate some contributions, while data collectors, community researchers and technical staff are often left out. Lists of participating institutions are read as partnerships or endorsements. Records collected for one purpose are reused for another without consent. Research communities have responded with contributor-role taxonomies that describe what each person actually did, and with persistent identifiers that people control themselves.
Data protection law and research ethics add a further rule: collect only what the purpose requires. Methods from デジタル ID と公共デジタル・システム show how a person can be identified reliably while disclosing as little as possible.
How the Registry approaches it.
- 01
Consent first
A person or institution is named only as they agreed, for the purpose they agreed, and consent can be withdrawn.
- 02
Described roles
Roles follow a published vocabulary of contribution types, never titles that imply authority.
- 03
Minimal data
Records hold the least personal data needed, and protected details stay out of public views.
- 04
限界
A participation record is not a licence, a qualification, an appointment or an employment record. Self-reported roles can be inaccurate, and recognition norms differ between disciplines and cultures.
Where this page’s references lead.
このページの読解の基準となる機関と文書。状態と版は変わります。各リンクは発行機関へ移動します。
質問と回答。
Can I be listed without my consent?
What happens when I withdraw consent?
Why use CRediT roles rather than a plain contributor list?
Does being listed as a partner mean endorsement?
Does a participation record make me a member or an employee?
Can I ask to be removed?
Is an institution named in a record a partner?
このページからエビデンスを提供する。
報告書 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- メールゲートウェイ GW-GCRIこのページから送信するエビデンス、訂正、事例、手法、レビュー、翻訳、プロファイルへの入力。このページのタグが付いて届くため、担当の編集者が受け取ります。
- Zenodoオープンな寄託寄託してコミュニティに提出するORCID iD を使って Zenodo に自分の記録を公開し、そこから Reports コミュニティに提出してください。キュレーターが審査し、DOI は引き続きあなたのものです。
- 報告書GCRI貢献のすべての方法を見る貢献の種類、それぞれの審査方法、受け取るクレジット、ライセンス、決して受け付けないもの。
個人データ、重要インフラの機微な詳細、共有する権利のないものは決して送らないでください。寄稿は利用前にレビューされます。送付によって著作者としての権利や編集上の権利が生じることはなく、スポンサーシップで調査結果を買うことは決してできません。
手法、データセット、または問いを持ち込んでください。
情報提供と問い合わせは本日から受け付けています。問い合わせには参照番号が付き、次の手順が示されます。申請、支払い、計算資源の割り当て、登録は、担当チーム、規約、審査体制が整ってから開始します。
法的文書。
このサイトの地図、データ、図表は、背景と一般的な情報として示すものです。助言、予報、警報ではありません。情報の限界は免責事項とデータに関する注意事項に記載しています。