GCRI · 登记册
参与记录
Participation records name the people and organisations involved in a programme or a work: contributors, participants, partners and reviewers. They carry recognition, but also obligations, because naming someone discloses something about them. This page sets out how consent is recorded and honoured, how contributions are credited with standard roles and identifiers, how programme boundaries are stated, and what happens when consent is withdrawn or attribution is disputed.
Participation records: how the risk develops.
Consent, recognition and programme boundaries. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Consent scope creep
Consent is given for one purpose, such as listing in a programme, and the record is later reused for another, such as publicity, analytics or a partner directory. Without the scope recorded beside the name, reuse quietly exceeds what the person agreed to.
Identity collision
Two contributors with similar names are merged, or one person appears as several. Credit goes to the wrong person, a withdrawal request misses some records, and a disclosure meant for one person reaches another.
Boundary blur
A partner named in one project is listed as a member of the whole programme, or an adviser appears as an endorser. Readers infer affiliation, endorsement or responsibility that no one agreed to.
Withdrawal does not propagate
A person withdraws consent and the primary record is updated, but exports, caches, partner copies and search indexes still carry the name. The harm the withdrawal was meant to prevent continues downstream.
How participation records is modelled, measured and tested.
模型、其假设、数据和不确定性，以科学家或工程师会核查的形式呈现。结构遵循已发表的方法。所取数值仅为示意，不是研究发现。
数据集与来源追溯
The data classes behind participation records and what is recorded about each before it is used.
| 数据类别 | 已记录溯源 | 已说明分辨率 | 许可已核查 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 卫星影像，光学与雷达 | 传感器、处理级别、获取日期 | 像元大小和重访周期 | 每景 |
| 再分析与气候模式输出 | 模型、实验、成员、版本 | 格网与时间步长 | 每次发布 |
| 原位传感器和测量站 | 测站、仪器、校准记录 | 点位与采样率 | 每个网络 |
| 人口与资产暴露 | 方法、版本年份、输入来源 | 单元大小和单位 | 每次发布 |
| 边界与参考地理 | 制作者、版本、日期 | 比例尺 | 每个版本 |
- 沿袭
- 从来源到图表的 W3C PROV 记录
- 原则
- FAIR：可查找、可访问、可互操作、可复用
- 缺口
- 显示为缺失，绝不悄然填充
Participation records show who took part in each domain’s work, and nothing more.
- 水实践中A utility that contributed data is recorded as a contributor, not a member.What a reader can checkRole recorded
- 卫生实践中Experts on a review panel are recorded with declared interests.What a reader can checkInterest declarations
- 生物多样性实践中Communities that shared knowledge are recorded with consent terms.What a reader can checkConsent and withdrawal
Participation records support the contributor roles printed in 报告 (CRediT). Personal data in records follow the applicable privacy law.
- Requests to correct or withdraw a record.
- Questions about how a record is used.
衡量什么，以及衡量得如何。
每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值：数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。
| 指标 | 单位 | 节奏 | 来源类型 | 标签 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participation records with a current consent status | share of records naming a person | 每月 | Consent register | 已声明 |
| Records with consent scope stated | share of records naming a person | 每月 | Schema validation | 观测 |
| Contributors with a persistent identifier | share of contributors | 每月 | Identifier linkage | 观测 |
| Contributions described with CRediT roles | share of contributions | per output | Contributor metadata | 已声明 |
| Records with a stated programme boundary | share of participation records | 每季度 | Schema validation | 观测 |
| Withdrawal requests completed within the policy period | share of requests | 每季度 | Case records | 观测 |
| Attribution disputes raised | 计数 | 每季度 | Integrity office records | 已报告 |
证据来自何处。
具名公共数据集与机构记录，各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用，绝不再次发布。
| 来源 | 它提供什么 | 许可类别 |
|---|---|---|
| CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104) | Standard roles describing each contributor’s part in a research output | Open standard, free to use |
| ORCID registry | Persistent identifiers and consent-based connections between researchers and their records | CC0 for the public data file |
| ROR (Research Organization Registry) | Identifiers for partner organisations and their relationships | CC0 |
| W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) | Terms for purposes, legal bases, consent states and processing operations | W3C community licence, free to use |
| GA4GH Data Use Ontology | Machine-readable terms for consent-based conditions on data use | Open ontology, attribution |
| ICMJE recommendations | Criteria for authorship and for acknowledging non-author contributors | Free to read |
由谁决定，以及证据服务于什么。
Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 谁来决定 | 问题 | 本页面服务的证据 |
|---|---|---|
| Research ethics boards | Whether consent covers the proposed listing, reuse or disclosure of participants | Recorded consent scope, its date and the uses each record supports |
| Data protection officers | Whether a lawful basis exists for processing and publishing personal data in a record | Purpose, legal basis, retention and withdrawal history for each record |
| Journal editors and research integrity offices | How to resolve an authorship or attribution dispute | Contributor roles, identifiers and the history of changes to the contributor list |
| Programme stewards | Who may be listed as a partner, member or contributor, and in what capacity | Signed participation terms and the stated boundary of each role |
该主题产生的产出
- Participation views showing each named party’s role, identifier and programme boundary
- Consent status and scope recorded beside every personal name
- A withdrawal route listing the records and known copies it reaches
- Contributor role records using CRediT terms where they apply
What experts ask about participation records.
- What consent is needed before a person or institution is named, and how is it withdrawn?
- How should roles be described so that credit is accurate and comparable?
- How can recognition be given without creating a credential or an employment record?
- How much personal data does a participation record need?
- How are institutional names protected from implied endorsement?
Where participation records go wrong.
Contribution records fail in predictable ways. Gift and honorary authorship overstate some contributions, while data collectors, community researchers and technical staff are often left out. Lists of participating institutions are read as partnerships or endorsements. Records collected for one purpose are reused for another without consent. Research communities have responded with contributor-role taxonomies that describe what each person actually did, and with persistent identifiers that people control themselves.
Data protection law and research ethics add a further rule: collect only what the purpose requires. Methods from 数字身份与公共数字系统 show how a person can be identified reliably while disclosing as little as possible.
How the Registry approaches it.
- 01
Consent first
A person or institution is named only as they agreed, for the purpose they agreed, and consent can be withdrawn.
- 02
Described roles
Roles follow a published vocabulary of contribution types, never titles that imply authority.
- 03
Minimal data
Records hold the least personal data needed, and protected details stay out of public views.
- 04
局限
A participation record is not a licence, a qualification, an appointment or an employment record. Self-reported roles can be inaccurate, and recognition norms differ between disciplines and cultures.
Where this page’s references lead.
阅读本页时所对照的机构和文件。状态和版本会变化；每个链接都指向发布机构。
问题与解答。
Can I be listed without my consent?
What happens when I withdraw consent?
Why use CRediT roles rather than a plain contributor list?
Does being listed as a partner mean endorsement?
Does a participation record make me a member or an employee?
Can I ask to be removed?
Is an institution named in a record a partner?
从本页贡献证据。
报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 电子邮件网关 GW-GCRI从本页发送证据、更正、案例、方法、审查、翻译或概况投稿。它会带上本页标签送达，由负责的编辑接收。
- Zenodo开放存缴存缴并提交到社区用您的 ORCID iD 在 Zenodo 上发布您自己的记录，然后提交到那里的 Reports 社区。由策展人审核；DOI 仍归您所有。
- 报告GCRI查看所有贡献方式贡献类型、各自的评审方式、您获得的署名、许可协议，以及绝不接受的内容。
切勿发送个人数据、敏感基础设施细节或您无权分享的任何内容。贡献在使用前会经过审查；发送贡献不赋予署名权或编辑权，赞助也绝不能换取研究结论。
法律文件。
本网站上的地图、数据和图表仅作为背景和一般信息展示。它们不是建议、预测或预警；信息的局限见免责声明和数据说明。