GCRI · Registry
Registros de participación
Participation records name the people and organisations involved in a programme or a work: contributors, participants, partners and reviewers. They carry recognition, but also obligations, because naming someone discloses something about them. This page sets out how consent is recorded and honoured, how contributions are credited with standard roles and identifiers, how programme boundaries are stated, and what happens when consent is withdrawn or attribution is disputed.
Participation records on the record.
Participation records: how the risk develops.
Consent, recognition and programme boundaries. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Consent scope creep
Consent is given for one purpose, such as listing in a programme, and the record is later reused for another, such as publicity, analytics or a partner directory. Without the scope recorded beside the name, reuse quietly exceeds what the person agreed to.
Identity collision
Two contributors with similar names are merged, or one person appears as several. Credit goes to the wrong person, a withdrawal request misses some records, and a disclosure meant for one person reaches another.
Boundary blur
A partner named in one project is listed as a member of the whole programme, or an adviser appears as an endorser. Readers infer affiliation, endorsement or responsibility that no one agreed to.
Withdrawal does not propagate
A person withdraws consent and the primary record is updated, but exports, caches, partner copies and search indexes still carry the name. The harm the withdrawal was meant to prevent continues downstream.
How participation records is modelled, measured and tested.
El modelo, sus supuestos, sus datos y su incertidumbre, en la forma en que un científico o un ingeniero los comprobaría. Las estructuras siguen métodos publicados. Los valores representados son ilustrativos, no hallazgos.
Conjuntos de datos y procedencia
The data classes behind participation records and what is recorded about each before it is used.
| Clase de datos | Procedencia registrada | Resolución indicada | Licencia verificada |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imágenes satelitales, ópticas y de radar | sensor, nivel de procesamiento, fecha de adquisición | tamaño de píxel y revisita | por escena |
| Reanálisis y resultados de modelos climáticos | modelo, experimento, miembro, versión | malla y paso temporal | por publicación |
| Sensores y estaciones de medición in situ | estación, instrumento, registro de calibración | punto y frecuencia de muestreo | por red |
| Exposición de la población y los activos | método, cosecha, fuentes de entrada | tamaño de celda y unidad | por publicación |
| Límites y geografía de referencia | productor, edición, fecha | escala | por edición |
- Linaje
- Registro W3C PROV de la fuente a la figura
- Principios
- FAIR: localizables, accesibles, interoperables, reutilizables
- Brechas
- se muestra como ausente, nunca se rellena en silencio
Participation records show who took part in each domain’s work, and nothing more.
- AguaEn la prácticaA utility that contributed data is recorded as a contributor, not a member.What a reader can checkRole recorded
- SaludEn la prácticaExperts on a review panel are recorded with declared interests.What a reader can checkInterest declarations
- BiodiversidadEn la prácticaCommunities that shared knowledge are recorded with consent terms.What a reader can checkConsent and withdrawal
Participation records support the contributor roles printed in serie Reports (CRediT). Personal data in records follow the applicable privacy law.
- Requests to correct or withdraw a record.
- Questions about how a record is used.
Qué se mide y con qué calidad.
Cada indicador lleva su unidad, su periodicidad, el tipo de fuente que lo respalda y la etiqueta de evidencia que llevaría un valor. No se muestran valores: un programa los aporta bajo su propia autoridad.
| Indicador | Unidad | Cadencia | Tipo de fuente | Etiqueta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participation records with a current consent status | share of records naming a person | mensual | Consent register | DECLARADO |
| Records with consent scope stated | share of records naming a person | mensual | Schema validation | OBSERVADO |
| Contributors with a persistent identifier | share of contributors | mensual | Identifier linkage | OBSERVADO |
| Contributions described with CRediT roles | share of contributions | per output | Contributor metadata | DECLARADO |
| Records with a stated programme boundary | share of participation records | trimestral | Schema validation | OBSERVADO |
| Withdrawal requests completed within the policy period | share of requests | trimestral | Case records | OBSERVADO |
| Attribution disputes raised | recuento | trimestral | Integrity office records | NOTIFICADO |
De dónde procede la evidencia.
Conjuntos de datos públicos y registros institucionales identificados, cada uno con su tipo de licencia. Las fuentes obtenidas por acuerdo solo se utilizan conforme a sus condiciones y nunca se republican.
| Fuente | Lo que aporta | Tipo de licencia |
|---|---|---|
| CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104) | Standard roles describing each contributor’s part in a research output | Open standard, free to use |
| ORCID registry | Persistent identifiers and consent-based connections between researchers and their records | CC0 for the public data file |
| ROR (Research Organization Registry) | Identifiers for partner organisations and their relationships | CC0 |
| W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) | Terms for purposes, legal bases, consent states and processing operations | W3C community licence, free to use |
| GA4GH Data Use Ontology | Machine-readable terms for consent-based conditions on data use | Open ontology, attribution |
| ICMJE recommendations | Criteria for authorship and for acknowledging non-author contributors | Free to read |
Quién decide y a qué sirve la evidencia.
Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Quién decide | La pregunta | Evidencia a la que sirve esta página |
|---|---|---|
| Research ethics boards | Whether consent covers the proposed listing, reuse or disclosure of participants | Recorded consent scope, its date and the uses each record supports |
| Data protection officers | Whether a lawful basis exists for processing and publishing personal data in a record | Purpose, legal basis, retention and withdrawal history for each record |
| Journal editors and research integrity offices | How to resolve an authorship or attribution dispute | Contributor roles, identifiers and the history of changes to the contributor list |
| Programme stewards | Who may be listed as a partner, member or contributor, and in what capacity | Signed participation terms and the stated boundary of each role |
Productos que genera este tema
- Participation views showing each named party’s role, identifier and programme boundary
- Consent status and scope recorded beside every personal name
- A withdrawal route listing the records and known copies it reaches
- Contributor role records using CRediT terms where they apply
What experts ask about participation records.
- What consent is needed before a person or institution is named, and how is it withdrawn?
- How should roles be described so that credit is accurate and comparable?
- How can recognition be given without creating a credential or an employment record?
- How much personal data does a participation record need?
- How are institutional names protected from implied endorsement?
Where participation records go wrong.
Contribution records fail in predictable ways. Gift and honorary authorship overstate some contributions, while data collectors, community researchers and technical staff are often left out. Lists of participating institutions are read as partnerships or endorsements. Records collected for one purpose are reused for another without consent. Research communities have responded with contributor-role taxonomies that describe what each person actually did, and with persistent identifiers that people control themselves.
Data protection law and research ethics add a further rule: collect only what the purpose requires. Methods from identidad digital y sistemas digitales públicos show how a person can be identified reliably while disclosing as little as possible.
How the Registry approaches it.
- 01
Consent first
A person or institution is named only as they agreed, for the purpose they agreed, and consent can be withdrawn.
- 02
Described roles
Roles follow a published vocabulary of contribution types, never titles that imply authority.
- 03
Minimal data
Records hold the least personal data needed, and protected details stay out of public views.
- 04
Límites
A participation record is not a licence, a qualification, an appointment or an employment record. Self-reported roles can be inaccurate, and recognition norms differ between disciplines and cultures.
Cómo se estudia y lo que los métodos no pueden decir.
- 01Identidad digital y sistemas digitales públicosAutenticación y autoridad del emisor · Desambiguación de los colaboradores por la propia personaAplicado aquí
- 02Ingeniería, interoperabilidad y custodia de datosIngesta validada por esquemas · Conciliación de identificadores persistentes · Captura del linaje en las cadenasAplicado aquí
- 03Ciberseguridad y criptografíaHistorial de registros con evidencia de manipulación · Exportaciones y versiones firmadas · Modelización de amenazas de las vías de ediciónAplicado aquí
Where this page’s references lead.
Los organismos y documentos con los que se lee esta página. El estado y las ediciones cambian; cada enlace lleva al organismo emisor.
Preguntas y respuestas.
Can I be listed without my consent?
What happens when I withdraw consent?
Why use CRediT roles rather than a plain contributor list?
Does being listed as a partner mean endorsement?
Does a participation record make me a member or an employee?
Can I ask to be removed?
Is an institution named in a record a partner?
Aporte evidencia desde esta página.
serie Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- Correo electrónicoPasarela GW-GCRIEnvíelo desde esta páginaEvidencia, una corrección, un caso, un método, una revisión, una traducción o un aporte a un perfil. Llega etiquetado con esta página, de modo que lo recibe el editor responsable.
- ZenodoDepósito abiertoDeposítelo y envíelo a la comunidadPublique su propio registro en Zenodo con su ORCID iD y luego envíelo a la comunidad de Reports allí. Los curadores lo revisan; el DOI sigue siendo suyo.
- serie ReportsGCRIVer todas las formas de contribuirLos tipos de contribución, cómo se revisa cada uno, qué crédito recibe, la licencia y qué nunca se acepta.
No envíe nunca datos personales, detalles sensibles de infraestructura ni nada que no tenga derecho a compartir. Un aporte se revisa antes de su uso; enviarlo no confiere autoría ni derechos editoriales, y el patrocinio nunca compra un hallazgo.
Aporte un método, un conjunto de datos o una pregunta.
La información y las consultas están abiertas hoy. Una consulta recibe una referencia e indica el siguiente paso; las solicitudes, pagos, asignaciones de cómputo y registros solo se abren cuando existen su equipo, sus condiciones y la capacidad de revisión.
Documentos jurídicos.
Los mapas, datos y cifras de este sitio se muestran como contexto e información general. No son consejos, pronósticos ni avisos; los límites de la información se exponen en los Descargos de responsabilidad y los Avisos sobre datos.