GCRI · Registry

Derechos y divulgación

Every record carries rights: who owns the content, under what licence it may be reused, who may see it and when it may be withdrawn. Openness serves verification and reuse, but some records hold personal, sensitive, culturally protected or commercially restricted information. This page sets out how licences, access classes, embargoes and withdrawals are recorded, where they conflict, and what rights holders and reviewers need before a record is disclosed to a wider audience.

02La pregunta

Rights and disclosure: how the risk develops.

Publication rights, withdrawal and audience. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mecanismo

Licence ambiguity

A record has no licence, a licence in prose only, or one licence on the landing page and another in the metadata. Careful reusers avoid it, careless ones reuse it wrongly, and holders cannot enforce terms that were never stated clearly.

Mecanismo

Audience leakage

A record meant for a programme team is exported, cached or indexed alongside public ones. Restricted fields appear in search results or partner copies, and once harvested the disclosure cannot be reversed.

Mecanismo

Embargo slippage

Embargo end dates can be recorded without being enforced, or enforced without being recorded. Content is then released early against agreements, or stays closed long after obligations end, defeating the openness that funders require.

Mecanismo

Withdrawal against the record

A rights holder asks for removal while the scholarly record calls for persistence. Erasure rights, takedown notices and retraction norms pull in different directions, and an unrecorded removal leaves citations pointing at nothing.

03Seguimiento

Interoperability console.

La pantalla que utilizaría un equipo para seguir esta materia: sus mediciones, estados y decisiones. Los nombres son ejemplos y los valores son ilustrativos.

Interoperability console

Rights and disclosure · Crosswalk · Profile v2

Test suite runningGCRI · Registry

Field mappings

identificadoridcopyAprobado
evidence_labelquality.labelenum mapAprobado
licencerights.licenceSPDX idAmbiguous
versionversionsemverAprobado

Conformidad

Required fields97 of 100 requiredControlled terms97 of 95 requiredRound trip83 of 95 required
Interoperability console: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Rights and disclosure.Nombres de ejemplo y valores ilustrativos; un diseño, no un registro ni un sistema en vivo.
04In the five domains

Rights decide what each domain’s data may be used for.

05Simulador

Stocks, flujos, retardos y un umbral de inflexión.

Dos stocks, la presión y la capacidad de adaptación, unidas por un bucle de crecimiento que se refuerza, una respuesta de equilibrio retardada y daños cuando la presión supera la capacidad; pasado el umbral, el sistema puede bascular. Modelo didáctico con valores ilustrativos declarados, no una predicción.

Controles

Crecimiento de la presión
6,0 % al año
Eficacia de la capacidad para reducir la presión
4,0 % al año
Respuesta de la inversión a la presión percibida
20%
Retraso de percepción
4.0 años
Umbral de inflexión de la presión
60 índices
Amplificación más allá del umbral
2,0 veces
Años simulados
50 años

Lecturas

Presión máxima
113 índices
Capacidad al final
Índice 186
Años por encima del umbral
15,8 años
Cifras, métodos y fuentes
AñoPresiónCapacidadPercibido
020.050.020.0
423.344.921.2
827.242.224.0
1231.742.327.7
1636.845.532.2
2042.351.537.2
2447.960.342.6
2853.271.348.0
3257.884.353.1
3666.498.458.4
4082.7115.969.7
4497.8139.783.8
48109.1169.497.3

Métodos

  1. Dinámica de sistemas Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
  2. Transiciones críticas y puntos de inflexión Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
  3. Diagrama de bucles causales Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
  4. Abanico de incertidumbre (Monte Carlo de parámetros) Spiegelhalter, Pearson y Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  5. Sensibilidad de un factor a la vez (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Datos

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

Stocks, flujos, retardos y un umbral de inflexión. Modelo didáctico ilustrativo: funciona con los valores fijados por los controles, no con datos medidos. Métodos: dinámica de sistemas (Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics); transiciones críticas y puntos de inflexión (Scheffer y otros (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461); diagrama de bucles causales (Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill).

En los seis pilares, bajo la dirección de Nexus Consortium

06Indicadores

Qué se mide y con qué calidad.

Cada indicador lleva su unidad, su periodicidad, el tipo de fuente que lo respalda y la etiqueta de evidencia que llevaría un valor. No se muestran valores: un programa los aporta bajo su propia autoridad.

IndicadorUnidadCadenciaTipo de fuenteEtiqueta
Records with a machine-readable licenceshare of recordsmensualLicence metadataOBSERVADO
Records with an access classshare of recordsmensualSchema validationOBSERVADO
Licence conflicts between metadata and landing pagerecuentotrimestralSampled comparisonOBSERVADO
Embargoes past their end date and unreleasedrecuentosemanalEmbargo registerOBSERVADO
Withdrawal and takedown requestscount by stated groundtrimestralCase recordsNOTIFICADO
Time to act on a takedown requestdíasper caseCase recordsOBSERVADO
Disclosure reviews completed before wider releaseshare of releasesmensualReview recordsOBSERVADO
07Métodos y evidencia

How rights and disclosure is modelled, measured and tested.

El modelo, sus supuestos, sus datos y su incertidumbre, en la forma en que un científico o un ingeniero los comprobaría. Las estructuras siguen métodos publicados. Los valores representados son ilustrativos, no hallazgos.

Conjuntos de datos y procedencia

The data classes behind rights and disclosure and what is recorded about each before it is used.

Clase de datosProcedencia registradaResolución indicadaLicencia verificada
Imágenes satelitales, ópticas y de radarsensor, nivel de procesamiento, fecha de adquisicióntamaño de píxel y revisitapor escena
Reanálisis y resultados de modelos climáticosmodelo, experimento, miembro, versiónmalla y paso temporalpor publicación
Sensores y estaciones de medición in situestación, instrumento, registro de calibraciónpunto y frecuencia de muestreopor red
Exposición de la población y los activosmétodo, cosecha, fuentes de entradatamaño de celda y unidadpor publicación
Límites y geografía de referenciaproductor, edición, fechaescalapor edición
Linaje
Registro W3C PROV de la fuente a la figura
Principios
FAIR: localizables, accesibles, interoperables, reutilizables
Brechas
se muestra como ausente, nunca se rellena en silencio
Clases de datos y campos de procedencia registrados para cada una; un conjunto de datos se enumera por su nombre solo cuando su licencia admite el uso.
Principios rectores FAIR · GO FAIR y FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumOrientación para un tratamiento coherente de las incertidumbres · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Comité sobre Satélites de Observación de la Tierra
08Fuentes

De dónde procede la evidencia.

Conjuntos de datos públicos y registros institucionales identificados, cada uno con su tipo de licencia. Las fuentes obtenidas por acuerdo solo se utilizan conforme a sus condiciones y nunca se republican.

FuenteLo que aportaTipo de licencia
Creative Commons licence suiteStandard licences with machine-readable identifiers for reuse termsLicence texts free to use
Lista de licencias SPDXStandard short identifiers for software and data licencesOpen data, free to reuse
RightsStatements.orgStandard statements of copyright and reuse status for cultural and research objectsOpen, free to apply
Local Contexts HubTraditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices attached to recordsFree to use under Local Contexts terms
Sherpa RomeoPublisher and journal policies on self-archiving and embargoesFree to search, Jisc terms
W3C ODRL Information ModelA vocabulary for permissions, prohibitions and duties in machine-readable formW3C document licence, free to implement
cOAlition S Journal Checker ToolRoutes to compliance with funder open access requirementsFree to use
09Decisiones

Quién decide y a qué sirve la evidencia.

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Quién decideLa preguntaEvidencia a la que sirve esta página
Rights holders and authorsUnder which licence and to which audience a record may be releasedFunder requirements, publisher policies and the record’s sensitive fields
Data protection officersWhether personal data in a record may be disclosed, restricted or erasedAccess class, lawful basis, retention and the public interest in a persistent record
Indigenous data governance bodiesWhether and how community data or knowledge may be sharedCARE principles, Local Contexts labels and the community’s recorded terms
Platform publishers and repository managersWhether to act on a takedown or withdrawal requestThe request’s grounds, the rights record and the policy for leaving a tombstone

Productos que genera este tema

  • Rights panels showing licence, rights holder, access class and embargo for every record
  • A disclosure review step before any record moves to a wider audience
  • A withdrawal and takedown route with its grounds and the tombstone it leaves
  • Machine-readable licence identifiers carried in every export
10Cuestiones centrales

What experts ask about disclosure.

  • Who holds the right to publish a record, and who can veto it?
  • How should audiences be defined when a record is useful but sensitive?
  • When does a public interest in disclosure outweigh a private interest in protection?
  • How is protected and Indigenous knowledge kept under its holders’ control?
  • What remains visible after a record is withdrawn?
11Mecanismos

Why disclosure decisions are hard.

Disclosure risk is cumulative. A record that is harmless alone can identify a person or a vulnerable site when combined with others, which is why statistical agencies apply disclosure control before releasing data. Rights are also layered: an author may hold copyright, a funder may require open access, a community may hold collective rights over traditional knowledge, and a data subject holds privacy rights that override both.

Research data communities summarise the aim as findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, while principles for Indigenous data governance add collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility and ethics. The Registry’s three classes, public, restricted and protected, are described on rights and visibility.

12Métodos y límites

How rights are applied.

  1. 01

    Classification at entry

    Each record receives a visibility class and licence before release, decided by its owner within the law.

  2. 02

    Audience control

    Restricted records are visible only to people authorised for a purpose, enforced with access controls from ciberseguridad y criptografía.

  3. 03

    Retiro

    Withdrawal removes a record from public view; its identifier resolves to a notice with the date and any replacement.

  4. 04

    Límites

    Nothing published can be fully recalled. Disclosure judgements involve values as well as rules, and re-identification risk changes as other data becomes available.

13Métodos

Cómo se estudia y lo que los métodos no pueden decir.

  1. Ciberseguridad y criptografíaHistorial de registros con evidencia de manipulación · Exportaciones y versiones firmadas · Modelización de amenazas de las vías de ediciónAplicado aquí
  2. Identidad digital y sistemas digitales públicosAutenticación y autoridad del emisor · Desambiguación de los colaboradores por la propia personaAplicado aquí
  3. Ingeniería, interoperabilidad y custodia de datosIngesta validada por esquemas · Conciliación de identificadores persistentes · Captura del linaje en las cadenasAplicado aquí
14Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

Los organismos y documentos con los que se lee esta página. El estado y las ediciones cambian; cada enlace lleva al organismo emisor.

15Preguntas

Preguntas y respuestas.

Why is a record without a licence a problem?
Because by default most jurisdictions reserve all rights, so careful reusers cannot rely on it and careless ones reuse it anyway. A clear licence protects both the holder and the reuser.
What is left when a record is withdrawn?
A tombstone: the identifier, basic citation metadata and the reason for withdrawal where it can be stated. The content is removed or restricted, and citations still resolve to an explanation.
How do the CARE principles relate to open data?
They complement FAIR by asking who benefits and who decides. For Indigenous data, openness follows the community’s authority to control rather than being assumed by default.
Can a published record be made private again?
Its access class can be narrowed, but copies already harvested may persist elsewhere. That is why disclosure review happens before release, not after.
Can the Registry publish a record because it is in the public interest?
No. The Registry cannot make a record public on its own initiative. The record owner decides, within the law.
Where do privacy requests go?
Mediante el formulario de solicitudes de privacidad. El acuse de recibo proporciona una referencia e indica el siguiente paso.
Are restricted records listed publicly?
Their existence is disclosed only where the owner allows. Their content is never shown in public views.
serie ReportsContribuir

Aporte evidencia desde esta página.

serie Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIRegistroMétodos y técnica
Registro

Aporte un método, un conjunto de datos o una pregunta.

La información y las consultas están abiertas hoy. Una consulta recibe una referencia e indica el siguiente paso; las solicitudes, pagos, asignaciones de cómputo y registros solo se abren cuando existen su equipo, sus condiciones y la capacidad de revisión.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.