01What Reports is
Reports is the quarterly publication of the Nexus Consortium. Six desks write it, and every edition shows its evidence, its method and its limits. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) is the publisher of record. If you build models or publish data on coupled systems, this is where your work is read against everyone else’s.

02This desk: Systems Evidence
GCRI holds the technical truth of an edition. It decides whether a finding rests on evidence that can be checked, and it leads the series that carry country, global and sector systems.
Mandate: Evidence, methods and models on coupled systems: water, energy, food, health and biodiversity, by country, region and sector, and the Labs evidence behind them.
Series this desk leads:
- Country Systems Risk and Resilience
- Global Systems Risk and Resilience
- Global Sector Risk and Resilience
- Methods and Technical
- Labs Evidence
- Foresight Outlook
03The six desks
Systems Evidence is one of six desks, and it deposits to its own Zenodo community under the flagship.

| Desk | Edition | Zenodo community |
|---|---|---|
| GCRI | Systems Evidence | nexusreports-gcri |
| GRF | Public Deliberation | nexusreports-grf |
| GRA | Capital Readiness | nexusreports-gra |
| NXS | Standards Progress | nexusreports-nxs |
| RA | Capability | nexusreports-ra |
| GRX | Measurement | nexusreports-grx |
04The edition in eight chapters, in this desk’s terms
Chapter 6 cross-references the other five desks and never copies them.
| Chapter | Title | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The coupled system | How the systems in scope depend on each other, and the couplings through which a shock travels. |
| 2 | Findings | The findings of the edition, each with its status, evidence-quality level and numbered sources. |
| 3 | Systems and sectors | Where each system and sector stood at evidence close, read in words and never scored. |
| 4 | Risks and capability | The risk objects of the edition and the capabilities that hold them, on the ladder of evidence. |
| 5 | Scenario cascade | One conditional cascade under stated assumptions; never a prediction. |
| 6 | Readings from the other desks | Readings from the other desks: cross-references to their editions for the same scope, not copies of them. |
| 7 | The 2027 agenda | The research questions the operational series takes up next, each traced to a finding. |
| 8 | Systems in depth | One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the series will watch. |
05How to contribute
Send GCRI the evidence behind a finding, the method that produced it, or a model another team can run. A correction to a value in an edition is welcome in the same way.
This desk takes:
- A dataset or source that bears on a coupled-systems finding, with its release and licence
- A method, model or code that an edition could use or test
- A correction to a value, a finding or a reference in a Systems Evidence edition
- A documented case of a cascade across systems
The gateway page of the GCRI Systems Evidence desk gives the route.
06The editorial workflow
For a research contributor the workflow is a promise about time. The window in which you can submit, revise or appeal is fixed, and an editor cannot move it by hand.

| Step | What happens |
|---|---|
| 1. Submit | Contributor declarations and licence terms are signed first. |
| 2. Screen | Editors check scope, completeness and licensing. |
| 3. Review | Peer review runs under the model declared at submission. Authors may revise, then the work returns to review. |
| 4. Decide | Named editors decide and record their reasons. Declined work can be appealed through a separate route. |
| 5. Accept | The decision is recorded and the work moves to production. |
| 6. Publish | A named editor publishes. The DOI is issued. |
07The sixteen-gate quarterly cycle
Your work meets the cycle at the evidence close. A dataset or method that arrives after that gate waits for the next quarter, so plan the submission deadline first.

| Order | Gate | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | call_open | The call opens. |
| 2 | call_close | The call closes. |
| 3 | submission_deadline | Last moment to submit into this cycle. Later submissions roll to the next cycle. |
| 4 | triage_close | Intake triage must be finished. |
| 5 | review_open | The review window opens. |
| 6 | reviewer_reminder | First reminder to reviewers. |
| 7 | review_close | Reviews are due. Overdue reviews escalate and are reassigned. |
| 8 | decision_date | The editorial decision is due. |
| 9 | revision_close | The revision window ends. |
| 10 | copyedit_freeze | Copyedit and data-check freeze. |
| 11 | evidence_close | Evidence close. |
| 12 | production_close | Production ends. |
| 13 | release_approval | The named approver signs the release. |
| 14 | release | Release date. It is the anchor of the cycle. |
| 15 | deposit_approval | Zenodo deposit approval. The deposit stays a draft until then. |
| 16 | corrections_close | The corrections window ends. |
08Release control
Before release, an edition passes the checks listed here. The data check and the citation check are the two a researcher can prepare for in advance.

- Check: Peer review passes.
- Check: Data check.
- Check: Citation check.
- Check: Accessibility check.
- Check: Legal check.
- Check: Licence and file rules.
- Check: Approver is not an author.
- The named approver signs a plan bound to the release digest.
- Six artefacts are fixed, each with a SHA-256 checksum: edition-pack, web, print, data-bundle, ro-crate, citation-metadata.
- The Zenodo deposit stays a draft until the deposit approval gate.
- The record is published with a DOI. A correction is a new version that keeps the concept DOI.
09Open licensing
You keep authorship. The edition publishes your text under CC BY 4.0, your data under CC0 1.0 and your code under an OSI-approved licence.
Licence rules
- Text, figures and maps: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX: CC-BY-4.0).
- Data: CC0 1.0 (SPDX: CC0-1.0).
- Code: an OSI-approved licence.
- Media: CC BY 4.0 or CC0 1.0.
- No NC, ND or SA licence on our own outputs. No paywall, no embargo on text, no fees.
10Zenodo community and DOIs
Research outputs are deposited to the GCRI desk community on Zenodo. It exists and is curated; every submission is reviewed before it is accepted, and it holds no records yet.
This desk’s community: zenodo.org/communities/nexusreports-gcri
- Flagship community: nexusreports. It exists and holds records today.
- Every record carries a DOI and a full version history. A correction becomes a new version and keeps the concept DOI.
11The open science stack, with its honest status
Most of the open science stack is built. Two items are not complete, and they are marked below so a reader does not assume otherwise.

| Integration | What it does | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Zenodo | DOIs, deposits and versions | Built |
| ORCID | Contributor identity and review credit | Built |
| ROR | Institution identifiers | Needs the id |
| COAR Notify | Inbox for peer review services | Built |
| OAI-PMH | A harvesting endpoint | Built |
| JATS XML | Journal article markup | Built |
| RO-Crate | Research object packaging | Built |
| Crossref | An export, not in use | Export only |
Cite
Reports, GCRI Systems Evidence, start here [Draft under review]. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium.
