GCRI · Systems Science and Modelling

Statistics for modelling

Probability and statistics are the language of uncertainty in modelling. In this field they underpin calibration, inference about parameters, evaluation of model performance and the honest reporting of ranges, for every modelling platform in the network.

01Register

Statistics for modelling on the record.

Method recordSTEM method
  1. MethodProbability and statistics
  2. StewardSystems Science and Modelling
  3. Applied inSystems Science and Modelling
  4. Canonical pageSTEM Commons
02Application

What probability and statistics does here.

Probability and statistics provide the mathematical framework for describing uncertainty and learning from data. They underpin estimation, testing and prediction in every risk discipline. In methods and modelling, risk management and systemic risk and research and evidence, statistical methods quantify the likelihood and uncertainty of losses across interconnected systems. They make the evidence behind risk decisions explicit and reproducible. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Bayesian calibration

Model parameters are calibrated with Bayesian methods that combine prior knowledge with data and produce posterior distributions, including a term for model discrepancy.

Proper scoring of predictions

Probabilistic model outputs are scored with proper scoring rules so that honest uncertainty is rewarded.

Ensemble statistics

Ensembles of model runs are summarised with statistical methods that account for dependence between ensemble members.

03Methods and evidence

How statistics for modelling is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

Model, equations and assumptions

The model structure used for statistics for modelling, the assumptions it makes and how each is tested.

Risk of element iRi = f(Hi, Ei, Vi, Ci)hazard, exposure, vulnerability and coping capacity
Expected annual lossEAL = ∑k pk · Lkover events k with annual probability pk
Coupled systemsxt+1 = A xt + B ut + εtA carries the couplings, u the shock, ε the error
AssumptionWhy it is madeHow it is tested
Hazard and exposure are independent within an eventKeeps the loss integral tractableCompare with a copula fit on joint records
Couplings are linear near the operating pointLets shocks propagate through APerturb beyond the linear range and compare
Vulnerability curves transfer between placesLocal curves are rarely availableValidate against observed losses where they exist
Inputs
versioned datasets with provenance
Outputs
distributions, never single numbers
Code
released with the model card and tests
Reproduction
same data, code, environment and seed
Standard risk and state-space formulations; the assumptions listed are typical of the method, stated for review, not results.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
04Data

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by probability and statistics on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DataRoleLabel
Observational datasetsCalibration and evaluationOBSERVED
Model ensemble outputsStatisticsMODELLED
Prior information from literatureBayesian priorsREPORTED
05Process

How the process runs.

Process

Statistics for modelling: Catastrophe model pipeline

Catastrophe models usually have hazard, vulnerability, exposure and financial modules, and produce loss tables, average annual loss, exceedance curves, PML and TVaR.

  1. 01 Hazard

    1. 01Event catalogueDataset · Model developerThe hazard module holds a large catalogue of simulated events that represents a wide range of plausible scenarios.
    2. 03Hazard moduleModel · Model developerFor each event the hazard module gives the local hazard intensity that the vulnerability module reads.
  2. 02 Exposure and damage

    1. 02ExposureDataset · Validation reviewerThe exposure module houses the portfolio data, such as location-specific information.
    2. 04Vulnerability moduleModel · Model developerThe vulnerability module quantifies the expected damage to the exposures from an event.
  3. 03 Financial

    1. 05Financial moduleModel · Validation reviewerThe financial module calculates losses from all event scenarios. Ground-up, gross and net losses differ as shown below.
    2. 06Event loss tableDataset · Validation reviewerAn event loss table lists each event with its annual occurrence probability and its loss for the portfolio.
    3. 07Year loss tableDataset · Validation reviewerSome models also sample simulated years from event losses. This outline does not describe their format.
  4. 04 Metrics

    1. 08Exceedance probability curvesModel · Validation reviewerThe occurrence curve gives the chance that the largest loss in a year exceeds an amount. The aggregate curve does so for the sum of losses.
    2. 09AAL, PML and TVaRModel · Validation reviewerAverage annual loss sums event probability times loss. PML is one point on the occurrence curve.
  5. 05 Use of results

    1. 10Use of resultsDecision · Validation reviewerThe tail metrics are used when considering a portfolio’s exposure and the level of catastrophe reinsurance an insurer requires.

Outline of an external standard or method, from its public sources. It describes what the framework says, not a record of any run. It does not show that Nexus or any partner performs, certifies or approves a step. A gate is a step of the method, never a Nexus approval.

06Validation

How results are checked.

Results are checked through diagnostics, cross-validation and sensitivity to assumptions. Independent replication confirms findings.

CheckHow it is done
Posterior predictive checksCalibrated models must reproduce observed data
Prior sensitivityResults are recomputed under alternative priors
Scoring on held-out dataPredictions are scored on data not used in calibration

Inference depends on assumptions about independence, distribution and sampling that may not hold. Small or biased samples limit reliability.

08Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Systems Science and Modelling stewards probability and statistics for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

09Questions

Questions and answers.

What are the limits of probability and statistics in this field?
Inference depends on assumptions about independence, distribution and sampling that may not hold. Small or biased samples limit reliability.
How are results checked?
Results are checked through diagnostics, cross-validation and sensitivity to assumptions. Independent replication confirms findings.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
The canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRISystems Science and ModellingMethods and TechnicalScenario and Stress-Test
Systems Science and Modelling

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.