Highly sophisticated risk simulations can remain underutilized if they do not align with first-responder workflows. This Quest tasks contributors with collecting structured feedback from on-the-ground responders about scenario clarity, timing of alerts, or user-interface complexities. The resultant improvements feed into robust scenario design that marries advanced analytics with real response rhythms.
Key Outputs
- Consolidated Feedback Dataset: Summaries of how first responders interpret hazard overlays, timing, or recommended actions
- UI/UX Improvement Proposals: Visual or textual mock-ups addressing identified bottlenecks
- Ethical & Operational Note: Document how certain communities or volunteer networks might require simpler or alternate data channels
10 Steps
- Scenario Setup: Select or generate a risk scenario (flood, quake, pandemic) from the open scenario library
- Survey Development: Craft a question set focusing on hazard depiction, resource mobilization steps, and interface usability
- Community Outreach: Identify volunteer or professional first responder groups, awarding initial eCredits for cross-stakeholder engagement
- Live or Recorded Demo: Present the scenario or a replay to gather immediate user reactions
- Usability & Timing: Document any confusion about color codes, lead time, or alert acceptance
- Peer Collaboration: Post partial findings on the platform for additional domain reviews, awarding partial pCredits
- Draft Adjustments: Summarize recommended scenario or UI changes
- Prototype Implementation: If possible, adjust the scenario environment and re-present to the same responders
- Validation: Achieve partial vCredits upon scenario leads confirming your improvements truly elevate operational readiness
- Finalize & Publish: Submit a short “Responder Feedback & Changes” doc to the open scenario knowledge base
Discover more from The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.