Global Risks Index (GRIx)
Systemic Risk Intelligence for Cascading Failure, Hidden Dependencies, Compound Shocks, and Strategic Resilience
Systemic risks cannot be understood by examining one sector, asset, hazard, technology, institution, or jurisdiction in isolation. They emerge when stress moves through infrastructure, finance, health, food, water, energy, climate, ecosystems, technology, supply chains, public services, institutions, communities, and public trust. A cyber incident can become an infrastructure disruption; a climate shock can become a food, health, finance, and displacement crisis; a public trust failure can become a governance and operational risk
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) provides systemic risk assessments, cascade maps, multi-hazard reports, dependency records, scenario strategy briefs, stress-test designs, resilience capability frameworks, public-safe intelligence summaries, finance-readiness questions, national portfolio inputs, and handoff packages. This stream helps institutions identify interdependencies, nonlinear propagation, common-mode failure, second-order consequences, correlated exposures, systemic fragility, cascade pathways, and resilience levers before local shocks become national, regional, financial, operational, or social crises
MEMBERSHIP PARTNERSHIP SPONSORSHIP
Systemic Risk Assessment
Systemic Risk Assessment examines how shocks move across infrastructure, finance, health, food, water, energy, climate, ecosystems, technology, supply chains, public services, institutions, communities, and public trust. It helps leaders understand cross-sector exposure, systemic fragility, hidden dependencies, and resilience priorities
Dependency Mapping
Dependency Mapping reveals hidden dependencies across systems, infrastructure, data environments, public authorities, providers, finance actors, communities, and operational pathways. It identifies common-mode failure points, correlated exposures, governance dependencies, provider dependencies, implementation constraints, and resilience gaps that conventional risk assessments often miss
Cascade Risk Analysis
Cascade Risk Analysis identifies how localized disruption can propagate through interconnected systems and become national, regional, financial, operational, or social crisis. It produces cascade maps, dependency records, scenario summaries, systemic risk intelligence, and resilience questions for strategy, preparedness, and finance-readiness
Compound Risk Analysis
Compound Risk Analysis studies concurrent, compounding, sequential, and interacting hazards across climate, disasters, cyber systems, health, infrastructure, ecosystems, food systems, public systems, and economic conditions. It helps institutions understand how multiple stresses amplify each other beyond single-risk planning assumptions
System Stress Testing
System Stress Testing uses scenarios, digital twins, tabletop exercises, cross-sector simulations, uncertainty labels, and strategic foresight to test how systems behave under pressure. It helps institutions compare preparedness options, identify fragility, test assumptions, and prepare for disruption without treating scenarios as predictions or commands
Fragility Assessment
Fragility Assessment identifies weak points, institutional bottlenecks, correlated exposures, social vulnerabilities, infrastructure dependencies, data gaps, governance constraints, and resilience failures. It helps leaders see where shocks are most likely to amplify and where targeted capability-building may reduce systemic exposure
Resilience Strategy
Resilience Strategy structures capabilities, redundancies, preparedness priorities, continuity pathways, learning needs, public-good tools, national portfolio inputs, and handoff routes needed to strengthen complex systems. It helps institutions move from risk recognition to capability formation without collapsing public-good work into premature implementation
Systemic Risk Intelligence
Systemic Risk Intelligence creates a shared intelligence layer through indicators, signals, hotspot records, cascade records, multi-hazard records, confidence labels, uncertainty labels, dashboards, public-safe summaries, and observability workflows. It supports policy, technical, finance, public authority, insurance, and strategic resilience audiences
Nexus Handoff
Systemic Risk Handoff transfers cascade context, dependency records, scenario outputs, resilience gaps, finance-readiness questions, public authority dependencies, procurement boundaries, recipient responsibilities, correction routes, and archive status to competent actors assessing regulation, finance, insurance, procurement, implementation, maintenance, or operations Trusted By World Leaders
We support governments, multilaterals, regulators, DFIs, central banks, humanitarian agencies, utilities, insurers/reinsurers, critical-infrastructure operators, research networks, and national working groups (NWGs). Our leadership is earned through proactive, cutting-edge solutions and initiatives that tackle urgent challenges while balancing immediate impact with long-term sustainability. Strengthened by strategic partnerships with global powerhouses, GCRI sets a new standard for protection and progress in an era of unprecedented risks and opportunities
Engagement can begin through Global, Regional, and National Consortiums; National Councils; Helix Councils; Systemic Risk Working Groups; cross-domain Competence Cells; Nexus Universe systems arenas; finance-readiness rooms; institutional partnerships; sponsorship pathways; and lawful handoff channels. The stream supports strategic risk intelligence, R&D, learning, readiness, and handoff; public authority decisions, emergency command, procurement, finance, certification, deployment, operation, and implementation remain separate
###### United Nations
Special Consultative Status Since 2023
###### World Bank
Civil Society Member
###### International Monetary Fund
Civil Society Member
###### Santiago Network
Member Organization
###### Thomson Reuters Foundation
Member of TrustLaw
###### Sustainable Development Solutions Network
Member Organization
###### Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)
Observer Organization Our National Working Groups (NWGs) converge to shape a future defined by Resilience , Innovation , and Collaboration. By uniting cross-sector perspectives through a seamless hybrid model; from community to cabinet, and field to cloud—we translate collective insight into breakthrough innovations and durable partnerships that deliver measurable impact and a more sustainable future for all
Unlocking the Power of Spatial Finance 🌌 for Disaster Readiness 📡
Transforming risk management by integrating DRR, DRF, and DRI into a seamless, proactive system. Leveraging cutting-edge geospatial analytics and innovative financial triggers, NE enables real-time insights and rapid resource mobilization to build resilient communities and drive sustainable growth
###### Systemic Data Foundation
A data foundation integrating indicators, signals, telemetry, incident records, infrastructure data, finance data, health data, food-water-energy data, climate data, ecosystem data, technology dependencies, supply-chain context, institutional records, and public trust signals. It creates a governed base for cross-system risk intelligence
###### Systemic Governance
A governance layer for cross-sector data use, sensitivity classification, role-based access, public authority boundaries, finance boundaries, community safeguards, public-safe outputs, model governance, correction pathways, archive rules, no-conversion notices, and role-separated handoff
###### Cascade Modelling Engine
A modelling layer mapping how shocks propagate across interconnected systems. It supports causal graphs, dependency networks, multi-layer infrastructure models, uncertainty labels, resilience intervention analysis, second-order effects, nonlinear propagation, and cross-sector failure-pathway review
###### Cross-Sector Simulation
A simulation layer testing how failures move between sectors under stress. It uses digital twins, scenario workflows, tabletop exercises, synthetic data, agent-based models, system dynamics, strategic foresight, and sensitivity analysis to compare preparedness, continuity, and resilience options
###### Resilience Optimization
An optimization layer prioritizing redundancy, preparedness investment, continuity pathways, data improvements, institutional learning, public-good tools, public authority dependencies, finance-readiness questions, and handoff routes. It identifies where targeted capability can reduce systemic exposure most effectively
###### Systemic Integration Fabric
An integration fabric connecting data lakes, APIs, event streams, dashboards, models, knowledge graphs, geospatial layers, telemetry, public-sector records, enterprise systems, national repositories, and controlled data rooms. It enables cross-sector analysis without forcing all data into one centralized platform
###### Dependency Graph Platform
A graph platform revealing hidden relationships among systems, providers, public authorities, infrastructure, data assets, communities, finance mechanisms, supply chains, service providers, and implementation actors. It identifies common-mode failure, correlated exposure, bottlenecks, operational dependencies, governance gaps, and handoff constraints
###### Compound Risk Models
A risk modelling layer for simultaneous, sequential, interacting, and compounding hazards across climate, cyber, disasters, health, finance, infrastructure, ecosystems, food, water, and social systems. It reveals amplification beyond single-hazard planning and supports multi-hazard resilience strategy
###### Observability Fabric
An observability layer collecting signals, indicators, telemetry, incident records, data freshness, model outputs, logs, dashboards, confidence labels, uncertainty labels, and correction signals across systems. It enables cross-cloud, cross-institutional, national, and regional resilience monitoring
###### Systemic Handoff
A handoff layer packaging cascade context, dependency records, scenario outputs, resilience gaps, finance-readiness questions, public authority dependencies, procurement boundaries, safeguard notes, recipient responsibilities, correction routes, and archive status for competent downstream actors
###### City Issues
learn more
###### Climate Issues
learn more
###### Education Issues
learn more
###### Energy Issues
learn more
###### Finance Issues
learn more
###### Production Issues
learn more
###### Justice Issues
learn more
###### Inequality Issues
learn more
###### Industry Issues
learn more
###### Land Issues
learn more
###### Oceans Issues
learn more
###### Hunger Issues
learn more
###### Poverty Issues
learn more
###### Equality Issues
learn more
###### Health Issues
learn more
###### Water Issues
learn more
###### Work Issues
learn more Innovation Lab
##### Discover;
##### Learn;
##### Build;
We support innovation, collaboration and knowledge-sharing amongst our members, partners and the broader research, development, and education communities. Our WILPs streamline the identification, mitigation, and evaluation of Risks, followed by the optimal use of GRIx to tackle Issues and manage adverse impacts. They provide secure network platforms that enable citizens to participate in MPM and use iVRS to report risks and values anywhere. Risk Pathways deliver out-of-the-box CRS functionality to meet institutional requirements, including SCF taxonomies for digital-green skills, compliance frameworks and real-time validation systems. They help members and QH stakeholders with DICE to navigate essential resources and find the right levers across the public-private-planet landscape.
###### MPM
Integrated pathways for existing national portfolios on the right to inclusive education, skills development, and career mobility through LLL for all
###### CRS
Rewarding participation with utility value across the network to increase interoperability and career mobility
###### DICE
Next-generation of internet for risk and innovation in pluralistic societies
###### GRIx
Open source standard indexing system for linked open data set about global risk and humanitarian crisis.
###### iVRS
Stakeholder engagement and reporting mechanism for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risks and impacts
###### SCF
Frameworks, skills taxonomies, competencies and policies for the twin digital-green transition Research0%Design0%Innovation0%Acceleration0%Policy0%
Building Tribes for Impact
###### Consortium Pathways
Consortium pathways provide the formal entry point for institutions seeking structured participation in anticipatory action, early risk intelligence, preparedness, disaster risk intelligence, humanitarian readiness, climate risk, finance-readiness, and national capability-building. They allow governments, enterprises, universities, funders, insurers, public authorities, civil society, humanitarian actors, technical partners, and communities to engage through global, regional, and national channels while keeping collaboration distinct from public warnings, finance, procurement, or implementation Learn more
###### Global Guilds
Anticipatory Action Working Groups turn expert knowledge and institutional experience into structured public-good outputs. They may focus on signals, indicators, trigger logic, forecast interpretation, scenario workflows, humanitarian sensitivity, community safeguards, public authority learning, finance-readiness, national portfolio inputs, technical notes, public-safe reports, and readiness questions that can be reviewed, corrected, archived, and routed for further use Learn more
###### Network Memory
Network memory preserves signal records, indicator histories, scenario outputs, trigger notes, public-safe summaries, learning materials, reports, datasets, technical objects, registry entries, listings, correction histories, archive records, and continuity pathways. It ensures that anticipatory action improves over time rather than resetting after each event, crisis, exercise, pilot, or annual cycle Learn more
###### Project Vehicles
National Consortium Companies and Project SPVs provide separate implementation-adjacent vehicles that may receive handoff context when anticipatory action work is mature enough for downstream consideration. These vehicles are distinct from the public-good layer and require their own legal, financial, public authority, humanitarian, procurement, operational, safeguard, liability, and governance conditions before any implementation activity occurs Learn more
###### National Councils
National Councils and Helix Councils organize country-level participation across public authorities, emergency institutions, academia, industry, technology, infrastructure, capital, insurance, donors, civil society, communities, media, humanitarian actors, and public-interest stakeholders. They translate anticipatory action priorities into national portfolios, preparedness learning agendas, working groups, capability needs, public-safe outputs, finance-readiness questions, and responsible handoff pathways Learn more
###### Competence Cells
Competence Cells provide focused expert capacity for anticipatory action challenges, including disaster risk intelligence, climate forecasting context, geospatial analysis, hazard modelling, trigger design, scenario simulation, humanitarian data governance, cyber risk signals, public health risk intelligence, food and water stress, finance-readiness questions, and public-safe reporting through bounded, reviewable, correctionable work Learn more
###### Annual Build
Nexus Universe provides the annual build and convergence cycle where anticipatory action work can be prepared, reviewed, demonstrated, routed, and advanced. It brings together national portfolios, risk signals, indicator sets, public authority learning rooms, finance-readiness rooms, working groups, competence cells, scenario workflows, public-safe reports, registry updates, and handoff pathways without becoming a warning center, emergency command body, investment platform, procurement forum, or execution event Learn more
###### Nexus Pathways
Handoff pathways transfer structured anticipatory context from public-good preparation to competent actors that may decide, warn, command, finance, procure, insure, implement, maintain, or operate separately. They preserve evidence, signal context, forecast assumptions, trigger logic, preparedness gaps, safeguards, public authority dependencies, finance-readiness questions, procurement boundaries, recipient responsibilities, correction routes, recall pathways, and archive status Learn more