GCRI · 登记册
权利与披露
Every record carries rights: who owns the content, under what licence it may be reused, who may see it and when it may be withdrawn. Openness serves verification and reuse, but some records hold personal, sensitive, culturally protected or commercially restricted information. This page sets out how licences, access classes, embargoes and withdrawals are recorded, where they conflict, and what rights holders and reviewers need before a record is disclosed to a wider audience.
Rights and disclosure: how the risk develops.
Publication rights, withdrawal and audience. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Licence ambiguity
A record has no licence, a licence in prose only, or one licence on the landing page and another in the metadata. Careful reusers avoid it, careless ones reuse it wrongly, and holders cannot enforce terms that were never stated clearly.
Audience leakage
A record meant for a programme team is exported, cached or indexed alongside public ones. Restricted fields appear in search results or partner copies, and once harvested the disclosure cannot be reversed.
Embargo slippage
Embargo end dates can be recorded without being enforced, or enforced without being recorded. Content is then released early against agreements, or stays closed long after obligations end, defeating the openness that funders require.
Withdrawal against the record
A rights holder asks for removal while the scholarly record calls for persistence. Erasure rights, takedown notices and retraction norms pull in different directions, and an unrecorded removal leaves citations pointing at nothing.
Interoperability console.
团队跟踪该主题时会使用的界面：其指标、状态与决策。名称为示例，数值仅作示意。
Interoperability console
Rights and disclosure · Crosswalk · Profile v2
Field mappings
| identifier | id | copy | 通过 |
| evidence_label | quality.label | enum map | 通过 |
| licence | rights.licence | SPDX id | Ambiguous |
| version | version | semver | 通过 |
符合性
Rights decide what each domain’s data may be used for.
Rights records are attached to every dataset used in 报告. Machine-readable obligations are the subject of NS-10 in the proposed Nexus Standards.
- Rights-holder concerns about any use.
- Licence corrections.
存量、流量、延迟和一个临界阈值。
两个存量，即压力和 适应能力，由一个增强的增长回路、一个延迟的平衡响应以及压力超过能力时产生的损害相连；越过阈值后，系统可能发生突变。这是使用明示示例数值的教学模型，不是预测。
控制措施
- 压力增长
- 每年 6.0%
- 能力在降低压力方面的效力
- 每年 4.0%
- 对感知压力的投资响应
- 20%
- 感知延迟
- 4.0 年
- 压力的临界阈值
- 60 项指数
- 越过阈值后的放大
- 2.0 倍
- 模拟年数
- 50 年
读数
- 峰值压力
- 113 指数
- 期末能力
- 186 指数
- 超过阈值的年数
- 15.8 年
数字、方法与来源
| 年份 | 压力 | 能力 | 感知 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 |
| 4 | 23.3 | 44.9 | 21.2 |
| 8 | 27.2 | 42.2 | 24.0 |
| 12 | 31.7 | 42.3 | 27.7 |
| 16 | 36.8 | 45.5 | 32.2 |
| 20 | 42.3 | 51.5 | 37.2 |
| 24 | 47.9 | 60.3 | 42.6 |
| 28 | 53.2 | 71.3 | 48.0 |
| 32 | 57.8 | 84.3 | 53.1 |
| 36 | 66.4 | 98.4 | 58.4 |
| 40 | 82.7 | 115.9 | 69.7 |
| 44 | 97.8 | 139.7 | 83.8 |
| 48 | 109.1 | 169.4 | 97.3 |
方法
- 系统动力学 Forrester (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press; Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics
- 临界转变与临界点 Scheffer and others (2009), Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461
- 因果回路图 Sterman (2000), Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill
- 不确定性扇形图（参数蒙特卡罗） Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
- 单因素敏感性（龙卷风图） Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley
数据
No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.
贯穿六大支柱，由 Nexus Consortium 牵头
- 实验 实验室
- 构建于 Foundry 中的登记册
- 检验地点 Universe 中的登记册
- 编入 Standards 中的基础与治理
- 发表于 Reports 中的登记册
- 授课于 Academy 中的治理、政策与国际事务学院
衡量什么，以及衡量得如何。
每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值：数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。
| 指标 | 单位 | 节奏 | 来源类型 | 标签 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Records with a machine-readable licence | share of records | 每月 | Licence metadata | 观测 |
| Records with an access class | share of records | 每月 | Schema validation | 观测 |
| Licence conflicts between metadata and landing page | 计数 | 每季度 | Sampled comparison | 观测 |
| Embargoes past their end date and unreleased | 计数 | 每周 | Embargo register | 观测 |
| Withdrawal and takedown requests | count by stated ground | 每季度 | Case records | 已报告 |
| Time to act on a takedown request | 天 | per case | Case records | 观测 |
| Disclosure reviews completed before wider release | share of releases | 每月 | Review records | 观测 |
How rights and disclosure is modelled, measured and tested.
模型、其假设、数据和不确定性，以科学家或工程师会核查的形式呈现。结构遵循已发表的方法。所取数值仅为示意，不是研究发现。
数据集与来源追溯
The data classes behind rights and disclosure and what is recorded about each before it is used.
| 数据类别 | 已记录溯源 | 已说明分辨率 | 许可已核查 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 卫星影像，光学与雷达 | 传感器、处理级别、获取日期 | 像元大小和重访周期 | 每景 |
| 再分析与气候模式输出 | 模型、实验、成员、版本 | 格网与时间步长 | 每次发布 |
| 原位传感器和测量站 | 测站、仪器、校准记录 | 点位与采样率 | 每个网络 |
| 人口与资产暴露 | 方法、版本年份、输入来源 | 单元大小和单位 | 每次发布 |
| 边界与参考地理 | 制作者、版本、日期 | 比例尺 | 每个版本 |
- 沿袭
- 从来源到图表的 W3C PROV 记录
- 原则
- FAIR：可查找、可访问、可互操作、可复用
- 缺口
- 显示为缺失，绝不悄然填充
证据来自何处。
具名公共数据集与机构记录，各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用，绝不再次发布。
| 来源 | 它提供什么 | 许可类别 |
|---|---|---|
| Creative Commons licence suite | Standard licences with machine-readable identifiers for reuse terms | Licence texts free to use |
| SPDX 许可证列表 | Standard short identifiers for software and data licences | Open data, free to reuse |
| RightsStatements.org | Standard statements of copyright and reuse status for cultural and research objects | Open, free to apply |
| Local Contexts Hub | Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices attached to records | Free to use under Local Contexts terms |
| Sherpa Romeo | Publisher and journal policies on self-archiving and embargoes | Free to search, Jisc terms |
| W3C ODRL Information Model | A vocabulary for permissions, prohibitions and duties in machine-readable form | W3C document licence, free to implement |
| cOAlition S Journal Checker Tool | Routes to compliance with funder open access requirements | Free to use |
由谁决定，以及证据服务于什么。
Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 谁来决定 | 问题 | 本页面服务的证据 |
|---|---|---|
| Rights holders and authors | Under which licence and to which audience a record may be released | Funder requirements, publisher policies and the record’s sensitive fields |
| Data protection officers | Whether personal data in a record may be disclosed, restricted or erased | Access class, lawful basis, retention and the public interest in a persistent record |
| Indigenous data governance bodies | Whether and how community data or knowledge may be shared | CARE principles, Local Contexts labels and the community’s recorded terms |
| Platform publishers and repository managers | Whether to act on a takedown or withdrawal request | The request’s grounds, the rights record and the policy for leaving a tombstone |
该主题产生的产出
- Rights panels showing licence, rights holder, access class and embargo for every record
- A disclosure review step before any record moves to a wider audience
- A withdrawal and takedown route with its grounds and the tombstone it leaves
- Machine-readable licence identifiers carried in every export
What experts ask about disclosure.
- Who holds the right to publish a record, and who can veto it?
- How should audiences be defined when a record is useful but sensitive?
- When does a public interest in disclosure outweigh a private interest in protection?
- How is protected and Indigenous knowledge kept under its holders’ control?
- What remains visible after a record is withdrawn?
Why disclosure decisions are hard.
Disclosure risk is cumulative. A record that is harmless alone can identify a person or a vulnerable site when combined with others, which is why statistical agencies apply disclosure control before releasing data. Rights are also layered: an author may hold copyright, a funder may require open access, a community may hold collective rights over traditional knowledge, and a data subject holds privacy rights that override both.
Research data communities summarise the aim as findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, while principles for Indigenous data governance add collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility and ethics. The Registry’s three classes, public, restricted and protected, are described on rights and visibility.
How rights are applied.
- 01
Classification at entry
Each record receives a visibility class and licence before release, decided by its owner within the law.
- 02
Audience control
Restricted records are visible only to people authorised for a purpose, enforced with access controls from 网络安全与密码学.
- 03
提取
Withdrawal removes a record from public view; its identifier resolves to a notice with the date and any replacement.
- 04
局限
Nothing published can be fully recalled. Disclosure judgements involve values as well as rules, and re-identification risk changes as other data becomes available.
Where this page’s references lead.
阅读本页时所对照的机构和文件。状态和版本会变化；每个链接都指向发布机构。
问题与解答。
Why is a record without a licence a problem?
What is left when a record is withdrawn?
How do the CARE principles relate to open data?
Can a published record be made private again?
Can the Registry publish a record because it is in the public interest?
Where do privacy requests go?
Are restricted records listed publicly?
从本页贡献证据。
报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 电子邮件网关 GW-GCRI从本页发送证据、更正、案例、方法、审查、翻译或概况投稿。它会带上本页标签送达，由负责的编辑接收。
- Zenodo开放存缴存缴并提交到社区用您的 ORCID iD 在 Zenodo 上发布您自己的记录，然后提交到那里的 Reports 社区。由策展人审核；DOI 仍归您所有。
- 报告GCRI查看所有贡献方式贡献类型、各自的评审方式、您获得的署名、许可协议，以及绝不接受的内容。
切勿发送个人数据、敏感基础设施细节或您无权分享的任何内容。贡献在使用前会经过审查；发送贡献不赋予署名权或编辑权，赞助也绝不能换取研究结论。
法律文件。
本网站上的地图、数据和图表仅作为背景和一般信息展示。它们不是建议、预测或预警；信息的局限见免责声明和数据说明。