ReportsIJRG

International Journal of Global Risks and Governance

Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, GCRI
Licence
CC BY 4.0, open access
Report series
17
Networks
7

Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Country profile

Italy: country profile

Abstract. The first annual edition of the Italy report. It fixes the 2026 reference state, the model, the voice and the positions against which every quarterly edition from Q1 2027 will be measured.

Edition
Italy 2026
Series
Country Systems Risk and Resilience
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Findings
12
Sources
40
Status
Draft in stewardship review

01Overview

Italy enters 2027 having cut its greenhouse-gas emissions to 363 Mt CO₂e in 2024, 3.6% below 2023 and 30% below 1990, but with transport emissions still above their 1990 level and the 2030 effort-sharing target out of reach on current policies [1] [3]. Renewables met 41.2% of electricity demand in 2024 [7], and Russian gas fell from about 40% of imports in 2021 to under 5% by 2023 [8]. 2024 was the warmest year in the national record [21]; Italy recorded 18,010 heat-related deaths in the summer of 2022, more than any other European country [4]. About 94% of municipalities are exposed to landslides, floods or coastal erosion [11]; the May 2023 floods in Emilia-Romagna caused damage of about €8.5 billion [14]; and 40% of buildings stand in zones of medium to high seismic hazard, yet only 7.3% of homes are insured against earthquake and flood [13]. This Baseline Edition fixes the reference state for the five core systems, maps the dependencies through which shocks travel, and sets the questions the first operational edition will answer in Q1 2027. It ranks nothing and decides nothing.

02At a glance

population, 1 January 2025
58.9 million
emissions, 2024
363 Mt CO₂e
renewables in electricity demand, 2024
41.2 %
heat-related, summer 2022
18,010 deaths
municipalities exposed to hydrogeological hazard
≈94 %
water lost in networks, 2022
42.4 %

03Key findings

Key findings
FindingStatusQualitySource
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined
EQL undefined

04Domain reading

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries risk into other systems.

Domain reading
SystemReadingCouplingStatusQuality
WATNetwork losses of 42.4%; drought on the Po in 2022; floods on dried soils in 2023.WAT → FOO · WAT → ENEReported4
ENERenewables met 41.2% of demand in 2024; Russian gas replaced after 2022.ENE ← WAT · ENE → HLTReported4
FOOA leading EU producer; drought and Xylella stress the South.FOO ← WAT, BIOReported3
HLT18,010 heat deaths in 2022; one of Europe’s oldest populations.HLT ← CLI, ENEReported4
BIORich biodiversity; about a fifth of land in Natura 2000; wildfire in the South and islands.BIO → WAT, FOOReported3
CLI2024 the warmest year on record; Alpine glaciers retreating.forcing on all five systemsReported5
INFRoads, rail and buildings exposed to landslides, floods and earthquakes.INF ← CLI, GEOReported4
FINOnly 7.3% of homes insured against earthquake and flood.FIN ← CLI, GEO · FIN → households, StateReported4
DATData-centre growth around Milan adds grid demand.DAT ← ENEInferred2
AICCompute growth not yet consolidated in national statistics.AIC → ENEExpert input2
MINManufacturing depends on imported raw materials and energy.MIN → industryInferred3
TRDExport-led manufacturing and agri-food exposed to energy and freight shocks.TRD ↔ ENE, FOOInferred3

05Sector screen

All sixteen sectors are screened on the same grammar, so that later editions can say what changed. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Sector screen
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposureCoverage
GS-00Cross-systemcoupled drought, heat and floods [4] [14] [24]drought-to-flood yearsPARTIAL
GS-01Water42.4% network losses [12]drought; floodsGOOD
GS-02Energy41.2% renewables in demand [7]hydro in dry years; gas supplyGOOD
GS-03Food≈14% of EU output [22]drought; XylellaPARTIAL
GS-04Health18,010 heat deaths, 2022 [4]heat among older peopleGOOD
GS-05Finance7.3% of homes insured [13]uninsured disaster lossesGOOD
GS-06Developmentgaps between North and Southservices after disastersTHIN
GS-07Climatewarmest year 2024 [21]heat, drought, cloudburstsGOOD
GS-08Disaster2016 earthquake; 2023 floods [14] [15]earthquakes; floods; landslidesGOOD
GS-09Infrastructurenetworks on unstable slopes [11]landslides; seismic damagePARTIAL
GS-10Citiesurban heat; flash floodsheat in dense citiesPARTIAL
GS-11Biodiversityabout a fifth of land in Natura 2000 [18]wildfire; XylellaPARTIAL
GS-12Earth observationstrong seismic and volcanic monitoring [16]data integrationGOOD
GS-13Cyber and digitaldata-centre growthoutages and attacksTHIN
GS-14Policyadaptation plan; insurance mandate [9] [10]implementationGOOD
GS-15Sciencestrong geoscience basetranslation into operationsTHIN

06System couplings

The Italy matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the starting graph that the Q1 2027 Foundry cut will test.

System couplings
CouplingStrengthCarried by
WAT to ENEStrongnuclear cooling · hydro
WAT to FOOStrongirrigation · rain-fed yield
WAT to HLTModeratedrinking water
WAT to BIOStrongflows · wetlands
ENE to WATModeratepumping · treatment
ENE to FOOStrongfuel · fertiliser · cold chain
ENE to HLTStrongfacility power · cooling
ENE to BIOModeratereservoirs · land use
FOO to WATModeratewithdrawals · nutrients
FOO to ENEWeakbiofuel feedstock
FOO to HLTStrongnutrition · food safety
FOO to BIOStrongland conversion
HLT to WATWeakworkforce
HLT to ENEWeakworkforce
HLT to FOOModeratelabour · disease
HLT to BIOWeakresidues
BIO to WATStrongregulation · filtration
BIO to ENEModeratefire on lines · biomass
BIO to FOOStrongpollination · soils
BIO to HLTModeratezoonoses · smoke

07Risk objects

Four risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

  • Extreme heat

    Reported EQL 4

    Driver
    heatwaves and tropical nights
    Exposure
    older people; dense cities
    Vulnerability
    one of Europe’s oldest populations; housing without cooling
    Capacity
    heat-health alert system; summer plans
    Cascade
    CLI → HLT · CLI → ENE
    Horizon
    seasonal
  • Drought in the Po basin and the South

    Reported EQL 4

    Driver
    dry winters; low Alpine snowpack; hot summers
    Exposure
    irrigation, hydropower, drinking water
    Vulnerability
    network losses of 42.4% [12]
    Capacity
    basin water-severity observatories [24]
    Cascade
    WAT → FOO, ENE, HLT
    Horizon
    seasonal · 5 years
  • Floods and landslides

    Reported EQL 4

    Driver
    cloudbursts; autumn storms
    Exposure
    6.8 million in medium flood hazard; 1.3 million in high landslide hazard [11]
    Vulnerability
    building on unstable slopes and floodplains
    Capacity
    regional alert centres; civil protection
    Cascade
    CLI → WAT → INF, HLT, FIN
    Horizon
    annual
  • Earthquakes and volcanic unrest

    Reported EQL 4

    Driver
    active faults; Campi Flegrei uplift [16]
    Exposure
    about 40% of buildings in medium-high seismic zones [13]
    Vulnerability
    older building stock; dense settlement
    Capacity
    seismic monitoring; civil protection; evacuation plans
    Cascade
    GEO → INF, HLT, FIN
    Horizon
    any time

08Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Capability ladder
FunctionLevelEvidence
Prevention and mitigationExistshydrogeological plans and seismic codes; much building stock predates them [11] [25]
Monitoring and observationDemonstratedINGV seismic and volcanic monitoring in continuous use [16]
Early warningDemonstratednational and regional weather alerts used in real events
Preparedness and planningExistsnational adaptation plan, 2023 [9]; national risk assessment [25]
Redundancy and reservesDemonstratedgas supply diversified after 2022 [8]
ResponseDemonstratednational civil-protection system in earthquakes and floods [15]
Continuity of critical servicesExistssector continuity plans; networks hit hard in 2023 [14]
RecoveryExistsState-funded reconstruction after earthquakes and floods
AdaptationExistsPNACC measures, implementation under way [9]
Social protectionExistsincome support; disaster-specific cover uneven
Finance and insuranceListedbusiness mandate since 2025 with low uptake; 7.3% of homes insured [10] [13]
Institutional coordinationExistsnational civil-protection service linking State, regions and municipalities
Technical infrastructureExistswater networks losing 42.4% of supply [12]
WorkforceExistsvolunteer-based civil protection; health staffing pressures
Research capacityAdequatestrong geoscience, climate and agronomic research

09Scenario

Drought-to-flood year. A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

Scenario assumptions
AssumptionSetting
Baselinethe 2026 reference state in this edition
Driversa dry winter with low Alpine snowpack; a hot summer with repeated heatwaves; intense autumn cloudbursts on dried, hardened soils
Analoguesthe 2022 drought and heat [4] [24]; the May 2023 Emilia-Romagna floods [14]
Interventionsnone modelled, the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run statenarrative specification; quantified Foundry run scheduled for Q1 2027

10Lenses

The baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument.

  • Technical Truth

    GCRI · KEY T

    The evidence supports a coupled reading of Italian risk. Heat, drought, cloudbursts, landslides and earthquakes are already recorded, and their losses fall mostly outside insurance. Evidence is strongest for emissions, heat mortality and hydrogeological exposure, and weakest for cross-system dependencies.

  • Public Meaning

    GRF · KEY M

    For most people risk arrives as a heatwave, a flooded street or a crack after an earthquake. The baseline asks that these be read as one system, and that public debate weigh who carries the losses when fewer than one home in ten is insured.

  • Capital Meaning

    GRA · KEY F

    Readiness implications only. Very low insurance take-up [13], a new business insurance mandate [10] and an effort-sharing gap [3] show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

  • Synthesis

    NEXUS

    Italy observes its hazards well, its seismic and volcanic monitoring is among the strongest anywhere, but its territory, buildings and networks carry deep exposure that is mostly uninsured. The 2027 programme should test the drought-to-flood year, map hydrogeological exposure and measure who carries the losses.

11Portfolio

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for admission at the Q1 2027 alignment. They are programme objects, no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Portfolio
CodeObjectKindAnswersStatus
INI-ITA-DFL-01Drought-to-flood year dependency modelInitiativeA-01Proposed
INI-ITA-HGR-02Hydrogeological exposure registerInitiativeA-02Proposed
INI-ITA-FIN-03Protection gap and fiscal backstopInitiativeA-03Proposed
INI-ITA-GEO-04Seismic and volcanic readinessInitiativeA-04Proposed
INI-ITA-HLT-05Heat surge readinessInitiativeA-05Proposed
MSN-ITA-2027-01Drought-to-flood year Universe missionMissionA-01Candidate

122027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 National Agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due at the Q1 2027 cut.

  1. A-01

    How would a drought-to-flood year travel through agriculture, hydropower, health and slopes, a hot, dry summer on the Po followed by autumn cloudbursts on dried soils?

    INI-ITA-DFL-01 · drought-to-flood year

  2. A-02

    Which homes, schools and lifelines sit in high flood and landslide hazard areas, municipality by municipality?

    INI-ITA-HGR-02 · hydrogeological exposure

  3. A-03

    Where does the uninsured share of earthquake, flood and landslide losses land, and how would wider cover change it?

    INI-ITA-FIN-03 · protection gap and fiscal backstop

  4. A-04

    How prepared are the communities around the Campi Flegrei for a further escalation of unrest?

    INI-ITA-GEO-04 · seismic and volcanic readiness

  5. A-05

    What heat surge capacity exists for older people at home and in care in the largest cities?

    INI-ITA-HLT-05 · heat surge readiness

  6. A-06

    How much drought resilience would cutting network losses and adding storage buy in the South and the islands?

    with GS-01 Water

  7. A-07

    How are Xylella, drought and wildfire changing olive groves and Mediterranean ecosystems?

    to be admitted in Q1 2027

  8. A-08

    Which capabilities have been tested in real events, and which are only documented?

    national capability register

13Coupled risk, applied response

Illustrative Structure only. The strengths fill in when real NXS-GRX (canonical data, provenance and risk) cuts exist.

No relation strengths yet.

Cells read no cut. No strength is drawn or implied.

No value to show. Source: Index (NXS-GRX) public API, series and relation classes. Blocker: The Index publishes no value until an edition is released from a governed evidence cut.

Risk: 6 sectors, 15 relations

Fifteen relations between six sectors. Strength is shown only when a cut supplies it.
SectorWaterEnergyInfrastructureFoodHealthBiodiversity
Water·no cutno cutno cutno cutno cut
EnergySee Water to Energy·no cutno cutno cutno cut
InfrastructureSee Water to InfrastructureSee Energy to Infrastructure·no cutno cutno cut
FoodSee Water to FoodSee Energy to FoodSee Infrastructure to Food·no cutno cut
HealthSee Water to HealthSee Energy to HealthSee Infrastructure to HealthSee Food to Health·no cut
BiodiversitySee Water to BiodiversitySee Energy to BiodiversitySee Infrastructure to BiodiversitySee Food to BiodiversitySee Health to Biodiversity·

Response: 6 pillars

  • Labs

    Explore, experiment and prototype

  • Foundry

    Build, simulate and prepare

  • Universe

    Convene and test

  • Nexus Standards

    Codify, correct and apply

  • Reports

    Publish in every format

  • Risk Academy

    Teach in the open

Each pillar answers a relation through its verb. A relation with no cut has no response claimed.

14Evidence by system

Evidence by system
SystemFindingsStatusBasis
Climate · forcing3Reportedlocal cloudburst and heat extremes
Health2Reportedheat surge capacity
Water3Reportedstorage, losses and exposure by municipality
Energy1Reportedhydro exposure in dry years
Geohazards1Reportedbuilding vulnerability by municipality
Finance · insurance1Reportedloss sharing and fiscal backstop
Food and biodiversity0, drought, Xylella and wildfire
Cross-system1Expert inputdrought-to-flood test

15Sources

40 numbered sources, editor first. Open the reference list and the data appendix.

16Cite, corrections and licence

The full citation, BibTeX and RIS are on the edition page. Corrections go through the gateway and are logged in Annex C. Text is CC BY 4.0.

Cite

Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) (Ed.). (2026). Italy: country profile. In Italy 2026 [Draft under review]. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium.

Review copy. The DOI is issued at deposit. Text under CC BY 4.0.

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence desk

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.