Skip to content

GCRI · Agency

面向技术援助的决策分析

Decision analysis structures the choices technical assistance raises: which expert to engage, which engagement type fits, whether a declared conflict can be mitigated, whether to deploy to a field site, and whether to continue, rescope or close. It makes criteria, weights, uncertainty and value judgements explicit so that the holder of the decision can examine them.

01登记

Decision analysis for technical assistance on the record.

方法记录STEM 方法
  1. 方法不确定性下的决策分析
  2. 应用于能动性
  3. 规范页面STEM 公共资源
02申请

不确定性下的决策分析在此处的作用。

Decision analysis under uncertainty provides structured methods for choosing among options when outcomes are uncertain and objectives conflict. It makes trade-offs and value judgements explicit. In governance and institutions and development finance, decision analysis helps choose actions that perform acceptably across interconnected risks and uncertain futures. It clarifies when to act now and when to keep options open. The canonical description is on STEM Commons.

Multi-criteria assessment of expert fit

Competence, context experience, language, availability and independence are scored against criteria set before profiles are seen. Weights are disclosed, evidence labels are kept beside each score, and sensitivity to the weights is reported.

Value of information before deployment

Before a field assignment, the decision holder asks whether a further security, health or access assessment would change the decision. Assessments that could change it are commissioned; those that could not are not.

Adaptive pathways for continuation

Programmes set signposts and triggers in advance, such as counterpart turnover or a failed diagnostic, that prompt a review to continue, rescope or close. Options that keep later choices open are identified early.

03监测

不确定性分析。

团队遵循该方法时会使用的界面:其指标、状态与决策。名称为示例,数值仅作示意。

不确定性分析

Agency · Decision analysis for technical · Run R-5933

敏感度排序GCRI · Agency

总阶敏感度

产出分布

输入

Requests receivedBetarequests, stated专家判断征询
Teams formedUniformteams, stated专家判断征询
Experts on roster正常experts, stated专家判断征询
申报利益冲突Betadeclarations, stated专家判断征询
Uncertainty analysis: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Agency.示例名称和示意数值;是设计方案,并非记录或实时系统。
04数据

该方法使用的输入。

本平台上不确定性下的决策分析所使用的数据集与记录,注明各自的作用及其数值所附的标签。来源列于 来源登记册.

数据角色标签
Competence evidence with labelsScoring inputs已报告
结构化 专家判断征询Probabilities where records are absent估算
Risk registers and incident recordsLikelihood and consequence inputs已报告
Cost estimates and budgetsConsequence of each option估算
Evaluation findingsRetrospective evidence on similar choices已发布统计
05方法与证据

How decision analysis for technical assistance is modelled, measured and tested.

模型、其假设、数据和不确定性,以科学家或工程师会核查的形式呈现。结构遵循已发表的方法。所取数值仅为示意,不是研究发现。

数据集与来源追溯

The data classes behind decision analysis for technical assistance and what is recorded about each before it is used.

数据类别已记录溯源已说明分辨率许可已核查
卫星影像,光学与雷达传感器、处理级别、获取日期像元大小和重访周期每景
再分析与气候模式输出模型、实验、成员、版本格网与时间步长每次发布
原位传感器和测量站测站、仪器、校准记录点位与采样率每个网络
人口与资产暴露方法、版本年份、输入来源单元大小和单位每次发布
边界与参考地理制作者、版本、日期比例尺每个版本
沿袭
从来源到图表的 W3C PROV 记录
原则
FAIR:可查找、可访问、可互操作、可复用
缺口
显示为缺失,绝不悄然填充
数据类别及为每类记录的来源追溯字段;数据集只有在其许可允许该用途之后才按名称列出。
FAIR 指导原则 · GO FAIR 和 FORCE11W3C PROV · 万维网联盟关于一致处理不确定性的指南 · IPCCCEOS 分析就绪数据 · 地球观测卫星委员会
06验证

结果如何核查。

分析通过 敏感性分析、同行评审与利益相关方审视加以核查。回顾性审查将决策与结果进行比较。

核查如何开展
Weight sensitivityRankings are recomputed across plausible weight sets; choices that flip are flagged for the decision holder
Evidence and preference kept apartScores record what the evidence shows; weights record what the decision holder values, and each is documented separately
Panel independenceEveryone scoring or eliciting declares interests, and conflicted members recuse from the affected choices
回顾性审查Past decisions are compared with outcomes to test whether criteria and probabilities were sound

结果取决于征询得到的概率与偏好,而这些可能存在偏倚。深度不确定性可能使期望值比较产生误导。

07流程

流程如何运行。

Process explorer · Process

Decision analysis for technical assistance: Hazard, exposure, vulnerability

10 steps4 个阶段

流程

Decision analysis for technical assistance: Hazard, exposure, vulnerability

In IPCC AR6 Working Group II, climate risk results from interactions between hazards and a system’s exposure and vulnerability, and responses can add risk.

  1. 01 驱动因素

    1. 01危害Dataset · Agency coordinator可能对人员、财产、服务或生态系统造成伤害的自然或人为物理事件或趋势的潜在发生。
    2. 02风险暴露Dataset · Agency coordinator人员、生计、物种、生态系统、基础设施或资产处于可能受到不利影响的地点与环境之中。
    3. 03敏感性Dataset · Agency coordinator某一系统或物种受到 气候变率 或气候变化不利或有利影响的程度。
    4. 04应对与适应能力Dataset · Agency coordinatorThe ability of 系统、机构、人类及其他生物适应损害、把握机遇或应对后果的能力。
  2. 02 评估

    1. 05应对措施带来的风险Component · Agency coordinator当气候应对措施未能实现目标,或因权衡取舍或负面副作用,就会产生来自应对措施的风险。
    2. 06脆弱性Component · Agency coordinator易受不利影响的倾向或习性。它包括对伤害的敏感性以及应对与适应能力的缺乏。
    3. 07风险Model · AgencyRisk results from dynamic interactions between hazards and the system’s exposure and vulnerability. Each may be uncertain and change.
  3. 03 响应

    1. 08风险管理与响应Step · Agency coordinator风险管理是指降低不利后果发生的可能性或规模的计划、行动、战略或政策。
    2. 09剩余风险Record · Agency coordinator在适应与减缓努力之后仍然存在的气候影响风险。适应可能在地区与群体之间重新分配风险。
  4. 04 决定

    1. 10由责任方作出决定Decision · Agency coordinator该框架不指定单一决策者。关于应对措施的决定由责任方依据其自身规则作出。

依据公开来源对某一外部标准或方法的概述。它描述的是该框架的内容,而非任何运行记录。它并不表明 Nexus 或任何合作伙伴执行、认证或批准某一步骤。关口是该方法的一个步骤,绝不是 Nexus 的批准。

09管理责任

由谁维护该方法。

系统性风险管理 为 Consortium 管理不确定性下的决策分析,并审查其在各平台上的应用情况。

11问题

问题与解答。

在该领域,不确定性下的决策分析有哪些局限?
结果取决于征询得到的概率与偏好,而这些可能存在偏倚。深度不确定性可能使期望值比较产生误导。
结果如何核查?
分析通过敏感性分析、同行评审与利益相关方审视加以核查。回顾性审查将决策与结果进行比较。
本页面上的数值是真实的吗?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
该方法还应用于何处?
维持社会运转的 规范方法页面 列出应用该方法的每个平台。
报告贡献

从本页贡献证据。

报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRI能动性组合与准备度
能动性

带来一种方法、一个数据集或一个问题。

信息和咨询现已开放。每项咨询都会获得一个编号,并告知下一步;申请、付款、算力分配和注册只有在相应团队、条款和审查能力就绪时才会开放。