Reports · GCRI · Established
Research and evidence · Methods and modelling · Innovation
Labs in Reports
Interdisciplinary experiments, technical research, methods and supervised innovation challenge programmes. This page shows the series it feeds, the evidence behind it and how to contribute.
- Series
- 2
- Systems
- 3
- Methods
- 5
What this area brings to the editions.
Interdisciplinary experiments, technical research, methods and supervised innovation challenge programmes.
9 findings of the drafted editions that bear on Labs.
Drawn from the Baseline Edition 2026 drafts through the systems this area reads. Each opens at its anchor in its edition, with its numbered sources.
- AREUnited Arab EmiratesThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a humid summer heat peak that loads power, desalination and outdoor-work protection together.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-ARE-SYS-012
- ARGArgentinaThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a multi-year drought with low Paraná flows that cuts harvests, river exports, hydropower and public revenue together.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-ARG-SYS-012
- AUAfrican UnionThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a drought year across several member states, met by high food prices and a disease outbreak.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-AU-SYS-012
- AUSAustraliaThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a hot, dry summer in which fire, smoke, heat and grid stress coincide in the populated south-east.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-AUS-SYS-012
- BRABrazilThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a strong El Niño drought that lowers Amazon rivers and hydropower while fire and thermal dispatch rise together.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-BRA-SYS-012
- CHESwitzerlandThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a dry year with low reservoirs and low river flows that cuts hydropower and raises winter import dependence at the same time as farm and forest stress.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-CHE-SYS-012
- CHNChinaThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is extreme rain on a dense plain in a hot summer that cuts roads, underground transport, water and care together.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-CHN-SYS-012
- EUEuropean UnionThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a summer of heat, drought and fire across several member states at once, met by tight energy supply.EXPERT INPUT · COUNTRY-EU-SYS-012
- GS-02Global EnergyThe leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a fuel supply shock that coincides with a hot, high-demand season and a stressed grid.EXPERT INPUT · SECTOR-ENERGY-GLOBAL-SYS-012
From Foundry evidence to the series.
The evidence, step by step, from the systems this area reads to the series it feeds.
How Labs reaches Reports: what it reads, how it reads it, the sealed cut and the series it feeds.
| Step | What happens | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 01 What it reads | Labs reads NXS-LAB (research, experiments and simulations) and NXS-NXQ (software, models and capability lifecycle): governed sources with their releases, never a value without its source. | |
| 02 How it reads them | Probability and statistics and Uncertainty quantification and model validation turn the evidence into findings, with assumptions and limits stated beside each value. | |
| 03 The cut is sealed | Each quarter the evidence is sealed in one cut, so OBSERVED, REPORTED and ESTIMATED values stay apart and every edition can be rebuilt. | |
| 04 The series it feeds | The cut feeds Labs Evidence and Methods and Technical, from the Baseline Edition 2026 into the quarterly series. | |
| 05 Who decides | Decisions stay with the authorities that hold them, under their own rules; an edition informs a decision and never makes it. |
A teaching model of the evidence path, not a forecast and not a record of any run; the systems, methods and series named come from the registries. Sources: Labs in Reports (2026); Labs home (2026).
The series it feeds, and what backs each.
| Series | Foundry systems it draws on | Academy disciplines | Series home |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labs Evidence | NXS-LAB what was tried, under which conditions, and what happened, including negative results | Research, evidence and the science-policy interface Complex systems and systems modelling | Labs Evidence series home |
| Methods and Technical | The Global Risks Index (NXS-GRX) the methods, indicators and validation studies behind each product NXS-LAB method comparisons under transparent test conditions NXS-NXQ the fitness record of models and tools the methods use | Quantitative risk analysis and statistics Model risk and validation Risk indicators and composite indices | Methods and Technical series home |
The systems, methods and teaching behind it.
- NXS-LABNXS-LABNXS-LABRooms: Experiments, Benchmarks.
- NXS-NXQNXS-NXQNXS-NXQRooms: Capabilities, Competence.
- NXS-FAC (blueprints, builds and signing)NXS-FACNXS-FACNXS-FAC
- STEM methodSTEM CommonsProbability and statisticsThe canonical method page, with its limits.
- STEM methodSTEM CommonsUncertainty quantification and model validationThe canonical method page, with its limits.
- STEM methodSTEM CommonsArtificial intelligence and machine learningThe canonical method page, with its limits.
- STEM methodSTEM CommonsSystems engineeringThe canonical method page, with its limits.
- STEM methodSTEM CommonsCausal inference and impact evaluationThe canonical method page, with its limits.
- Academy disciplineRisk AcademyResearch, evidence and the science-policy interfaceFaculty of Governance, Policy and International Affairs
- Academy disciplineRisk AcademyInnovation and frontier technology governanceFaculty of Governance, Policy and International Affairs
- Academy disciplineRisk AcademyWater-energy-food-ecosystems nexusFaculty of Systems and Nexus Studies
- FieldGCRIResearch and evidenceThe field across science, governance and finance.
- FieldGCRIMethods and modellingThe field across science, governance and finance.
- FieldGCRIInnovationThe field across science, governance and finance.
Where the same subject is reported elsewhere.
- Counterpart · GRFReportsResearch NexusShared: Research and evidence.
- Counterpart · GRFReportsInnovation NexusShared: Innovation.
- Counterpart · GRAReportsActuarial and Quantitative RiskShared: Methods and modelling.
- Standards areaNexus StandardsData and datasetsData and evidence. Parts NS-3, NS-3b, NS-11, NS-1.
- Standards areaNexus StandardsSoftware and supply chainTrust, verification and assurance. Parts NS-12, NS-11, NS-1.
- Standards areaNexus StandardsDocumentation and publicationData and evidence. Parts NS-2, NS-4, NS-7, NS-8.
- Standards areaNexus StandardsProvenance and evidenceData and evidence. Parts NS-3b, NS-11, NS-3.
- Standards areaNexus StandardsVerification and monitoringTrust, verification and assurance. Parts NS-11, NS-10, NS-14.
- Standards areaNexus StandardsPrivacy and data protectionData and evidence. Parts NS-10, NS-11, NS-3.
Contribute on Labs.
Evidence, a case, a correction, a method or profile input on this subject. The composer tags it with this area and its series.
Write a contribution the editor can act on.
Say what it is, where its record is kept and on which licence. It arrives tagged with this page, its area and its gateway, so it reaches the editor who owns it.
Your email opens with the subject and a template already filled in for GW-GCRI.
- Evidence
- Correction
- Case study
- Analysis or method
- Peer review
- Translation
- Profile input
Never send personal data or sensitive infrastructure detail. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights.
Open science for Labs.
How a contribution on this subject is deposited, identified, credited, licensed and found, and the metadata for it prefilled from this page.
Labs’s open record
Credit and identity
- ORCID
- Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
- ROR
- Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
- CRediT
- Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
- Account
- None needed to contribute; never a password
Find and follow
Search the open indexes for Labs; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.
Mirrors and harvest
The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.
{
"metadata": {
"resource_type": {
"id": "dataset"
},
"title": "Evidence on Labs for Nexus Reports",
"publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"creators": [
{
"person_or_org": {
"type": "personal",
"family_name": "Your family name",
"given_name": "Your given name",
"identifiers": [
{
"scheme": "orcid",
"identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
}
]
},
"affiliations": [
{
"id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
}
]
}
],
"description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Labs in Nexus Reports.",
"rights": [
{
"id": "cc-by-4.0"
}
],
"subjects": [
{
"subject": "Nexus Reports"
},
{
"subject": "Labs"
},
{
"subject": "Research and evidence"
},
{
"subject": "Methods and modelling"
},
{
"subject": "Innovation"
}
],
"related_identifiers": [
{
"identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/areas/nexus-labs/",
"scheme": "url",
"relation_type": {
"id": "issupplementto"
},
"resource_type": {
"id": "other"
}
}
],
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"custom_fields": {},
"access": {
"record": "public",
"files": "public"
},
"files": {
"enabled": true
},
"parent": {
"communities": {
"default": "nexusreports"
}
}
}Releases for this area.
Releases tagged to this area appear here once released.
Send evidence on Labs.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.
- EmailGateway GW-GCRISend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGCRISee which desk takes what you haveThe routing table opens the contribution page: what you have, the desk that takes it, how each contribution is reviewed and credited, and the licence.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Around the reports at GCRI.
Bring what you know to the next edition.
Every quarter closes on a sealed evidence cut. Contributions received before the cut are reviewed for that edition; later ones wait for the next.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.
CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.