GCRI · Systemic Risk Management
Research and evidence
The research behind Systemic Risk Management: the questions it asks, the models and measurements it uses, how uncertainty is stated and how a result is reviewed and reproduced before it is published.
Research and evidence on the record.
- 02STEM methods6 canonical methods applied
- 03Topics8 subject pages
- 04Counterparts5 platforms in shared fields
- 05PublisherThe Global Centre for Risk and Innovation
- 06Methods uncertaintyMethods and uncertainty
- 07Source dataSource and data register
What the research asks.
- 01
Risk governance and appetite
Authority, objectives and acceptable exposure.
- 02
Identification and risk taxonomy
Risk identification beyond registers.
- 03
Cascades and interdependence
Network, common-cause and correlated failures.
- 04
Quantitative and qualitative methods
Probability, uncertainty and judgement.
- 05
Scenario and stress testing
Challenging plans and assumptions.
- 06
Resilience engineering
Continuity, recovery and adaptive capacity.
What risk management research cannot yet answer well enough for decisions.
Risk management practice is mature for risks an organisation owns. The agenda concentrates on the risks that arrive from outside the register: cascades, common dependencies and emerging risks.
- How can organisations’ risk registers be linked so that shared dependencies become visible? See cascades and interdependence.
- How should risk appetite be expressed for low-probability, high-consequence systemic events? See risk governance and appetite.
- Which risk taxonomies let public and private registers be compared? See identification and risk taxonomy.
- How should combined stress scenarios be built for public risk registers? See scenario and stress testing.
Every result keeps its label.
Results are labelled as observed, published statistics, estimated, modelled, forecast, scenario or expert judgement. Missing data is shown as missing, never filled silently.
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Pages in Research and evidence.
Questions and answers.
Can I propose a research question?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GCRISend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGCRISee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.