The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Ports, coastal roads, power plants, airports and defences sit at the shoreline because they need the sea or the flat land beside it. That location exposes them to storm surge, waves, wind and rising sea level, and port disruption interrupts trade, fuel and food supply. This page sets out how coastal infrastructure is affected by ocean hazards, how exposure is assessed, and what evidence serves the authorities and operators responsible.
GCRI · In development · service level R0
Port climate adaptation is the adjustment of ports and coastal infrastructure to storm surge, waves, wind and rising sea level. Ports are exposed by design at the water's edge, operational downtime can cost more than physical damage, and disruption spreads inland through roads, rail and supply chains.
For ports and maritime infrastructure, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on marine heat, sea temperature, chlorophyll and true-colour imagery with relief in 3D, framed on Pacific Island states; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 4
Ocean state, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For ports and maritime infrastructure, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on marine heat, sea temperature, chlorophyll and true-colour imagery with relief in 3D, framed on Pacific Island states; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
Ports and maritime infrastructure · Coastal zone A · Sea level scenario set
placeholder coastline
| Dune nourishment | 0.4 | 1 | Raise seawall | Overtopping twice in 5 yr |
| Raise seawall | 0.7 | 10 | Managed realignment | Seawall at design limit |
| Managed realignment | 1.3 | 11 | Relocate assets | Community decision |
Coastal transport and continuity. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Ports sit at the water's edge with low quays, cranes and storage. Storm surge and waves flood terminals, damage equipment and close channels.
Cranes stop above wind limits, and pilots and ships cannot enter in high waves. Operational downtime can exceed physical damage in cost.
Quay heights and drainage designed for past sea levels lose freeboard as the sea rises, so the same storm floods more often.
Ports depend on roads, rail, power and fuel supply that may also flood. Disruption spreads inland through supply chains.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Freeboard | The height of a structure above the water level, which shrinks as the sea rises. |
| Operational downtime | Time when port operations stop because conditions exceed safe limits. |
| Breakwater | A structure built offshore or at a harbour entrance to reduce wave energy. |
Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.
| Indicator | Unit | Cadence | Source type | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quay elevation above extreme sea level | metres | per assessment | Port surveys and sea-level analysis | ESTIMATED |
| Operational downtime from weather | hours per year | annual | Port operational records | OBSERVED |
| Coastal infrastructure in flood hazard zones | count and value | per assessment | Asset maps and hazard maps | ESTIMATED |
| Storm damage to port facilities | events with recorded damage | annual | Port and insurance records | REPORTED |
| Wave height at harbour entrance | metres | hourly | Wave buoys and models | OBSERVED |
| Ports with climate adaptation plans | count | per assessment | Port authority disclosures | DECLARED |
The topic as a computational graph: named sources feed the methods, an evidence review gates the outputs, and the decisions stay with the authorities that hold them.
Fig. 02Nodes carry their type, two metric rows and a state; connectors show what feeds what; dashed frames name the owners; the timeline is the cadence. Design of the pipeline, not a record of a run.
Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.
| Source | What it gives | Licence class |
|---|---|---|
| UNCTAD climate adaptation of ports reports and surveys | Port exposure and adaptation practice | Public, UNCTAD terms (to check) |
| PIANC guidance on climate change adaptation for waterborne transport infrastructure | Engineering guidance for ports and waterways | Licence per publication |
| Copernicus Marine Service wave and sea level products | Wave and water level hindcasts and forecasts | Free, Copernicus Marine licence |
| IMF PortWatch | Port activity and disruption estimates | Public, IMF terms (to check) |
| Coastal infrastructure from OpenStreetMap | Locations of ports, roads and facilities | Open, ODbL |
Oceans and Coasts prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Who decides | The question | Evidence this page serves |
|---|---|---|
| Port authorities and operators | Which adaptation measures to invest in and when | Exposure assessments; downtime analyses |
| Ministries of transport | Which coastal assets need protection or relocation | Infrastructure hazard overlays |
| Coastal engineers and designers | Which design sea levels and wave conditions to adopt | Extreme sea level and wave evidence |
Direct physical damage comes from surge and wave overtopping, wind damage to cranes and warehouses, and scour of foundations. Many disruptions are indirect: navigation channels silt up after storms, power or communications fail, access roads flood, or workers cannot reach the port. Heat affects equipment and workers, and low river levels can disrupt inland waterway connections that feed coastal ports.
Shipping networks transmit disruption. A closure at a hub port causes vessels to divert or queue, congestion spreads to neighbouring ports, and schedules take weeks to recover. Islands and remote coasts served by a single port can face shortages quickly. Sea-level rise lowers the effective freeboard of quays and breakwaters, so design margins chosen decades ago shrink.
Ports also shape the coast around them. Dredging, reclamation and breakwaters alter sediment transport and habitats, so port development and adaptation have ecological effects that feed back into flood exposure and fisheries along neighbouring shores.
Fragility curves relate hazard intensity to damage for port assets; design standards set heights and loads.
Network models of routes and hinterland connections estimate how closures propagate.
Automatic identification system data show vessel movements and port calls; access and coverage vary.
Limits: port asset data are often commercially sensitive or incomplete, fragility data for port equipment are limited, and network models simplify how shippers and operators adapt.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.