GCRI · Future of Work and Skills
Institutional workforce planning
Hospitals, schools, utilities and public administrations must anticipate how many staff with which skills they will need, as demand, technology and demographics change. Shortages in critical services can become crises when shocks hit. This page sets out how workforce planning works, how supply and demand for skills are forecast and monitored, and what evidence serves the institutions and governments that plan their workforce.
Institutional workforce planning on the record.
Institutional workforce planning: how the risk develops.
Public and private sector capacity. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Training takes years
Doctors, nurses, engineers and teachers take years to train, so shortages cannot be fixed quickly and planning must look ahead.
Retirement waves create gaps
Ageing workforces in public services face waves of retirement that drain experience faster than recruits can replace it.
Migration moves skills
Health and other professionals migrate to higher-paying countries, relieving shortages there and creating them in origin countries.
Shortages cascade in crises
In emergencies, understaffed services lose capacity first, and burnout among remaining staff can drive further departures.
Skills and exposure console.
The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.
Skills and exposure console
Institutional workforce planning · Labour market A · Year 2
Occupations by exposure
| Clerical support | 51,451 | 0.7 | Substitute | Data operations |
| Machine operators | 28,183 | 0.7 | Mixed | Robot maintenance |
| Care workers | 52,511 | 0.1 | Complement | Upskill |
| Analysts | 24,349 | 0.3 | Complement | Upskill |
Vacancies by skill
Reskilling pathway
- Assessskills profile
- Matchtarget role
- Train11 weeks
- Placeemployer
- Follow up6 months
Institutions in every domain need workforce plans.
Findings are designed for the Country Systems Risk and Resilience series. Workforce data use ISCO-08; plans are decided by institutions.
- Workforce plans institutions publish.
- Knowledge transfer evaluations.
How institutional workforce planning is modelled, measured and tested.
The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.
System model
The couplings between the systems in institutional workforce planning: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
What is measured, and how well.
Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.
| Indicator | Unit | Cadence | Source type | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate in critical occupations | percent of posts | quarterly | Employer and sector records | REPORTED |
| Workforce age profile | share aged fifty-five and over | annual | Workforce registers | Published statistics |
| Training places versus projected need | ratio | annual | Planning projections | FORECAST |
| Staff turnover | percent per year | annual | Human resources records | OBSERVED |
| Foreign-trained professionals | percent of workforce | annual | Professional registers | Published statistics |
| Health worker density | per ten thousand population | annual | National Health Workforce Accounts | Published statistics |
Where the evidence comes from.
Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.
| Source | What it gives | Licence class |
|---|---|---|
| WHO National Health Workforce Accounts | Health workforce stock and flows | Open, WHO terms of use |
| WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel reporting | Ethical recruitment and migration data | Public, WHO terms of use |
| Cedefop skills forecasts | Skills supply and demand projections in Europe | Public, EU terms |
| Public service workforce statistics | Size, age and turnover of public workforces | Public records, licence per government |
| UNESCO data on teachers | Teacher numbers and qualifications | Open, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO |
Who decides, and what the evidence serves.
Future of Work and Skills prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Who decides | The question | Evidence this page serves |
|---|---|---|
| Health, education and public service ministries | How many professionals to train and recruit | Projections; turnover analyses |
| Institutions and employers | How to retain staff and plan succession | Turnover and age evidence |
| Governments in origin and destination countries | How to manage professional migration ethically | Migration evidence |
Outputs this topic produces
- Workforce supply and demand projections with ranges
- Retirement and turnover risk analyses
- Migration flow analyses for critical professions
- Evidence notes for workforce strategies
What workforce planners ask.
- What skills will the organisation or sector need in five and ten years?
- How many people with those skills exist, and how many will retire or leave?
- Where are shortages most likely to disrupt critical services?
- How can capacity be built, through training, recruitment, redesign or technology?
Why shortages persist.
Training skilled workers takes years, so supply responds slowly to demand. Ageing workforces in sectors such as health, utilities and public administration create waves of retirement. Public sector pay structures may not compete for scarce skills such as digital, engineering and data roles. Critical national missions, such as an energy transition or a disaster recovery programme, can require skills faster than systems can produce them.
Planning often fails because it extrapolates past trends, works in sector silos and is not linked to education provision or funding decisions.
Tools for planning capacity.
- 01
Supply and demand modelling
Projecting workforce stock and needs under scenarios, using economics and development economics. Projections are sensitive to assumptions about technology and policy.
- 02
Competency mapping
Defining the competencies roles require and assessing the current workforce against them.
- 03
Scenario planning
Testing workforce plans against different futures, using econometrics and expert judgement. Scenarios are not forecasts.
- 04
Capacity audits
Reviewing critical roles, single points of failure and succession.
How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.
- 01EconometricsDisplacement effects with linked data · Training programme evaluation · Workforce projectionsApplied here
- 02Social and behavioural scienceJob quality surveys · Social dialogue studies · Learner experience researchApplied here
- 03Economics and development economicsTask-based analysis of technology · Labour market institutions · Just transition economicsApplied here
- 04Artificial intelligence and machine learningSkills extraction from job postings · Job matching in employment servicesApplied here
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Questions and answers.
What is workforce planning?
Why do health worker shortages persist?
What is the WHO Global Code on recruitment?
Why do workforce plans often miss?
Can technology fill skill shortages?
Does the platform produce workforce plans for organisations?
How does an ageing workforce affect planning?
What is a single point of failure in a workforce?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GCRISend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGCRISee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.