Skip to content

GCRI · Trade and Strategic Resources

Geoeconomics and fragmentation

Trade is increasingly shaped by security concerns: export controls, sanctions, investment screening, subsidies and tariffs that steer supply chains toward allies or home. These measures can reduce some dependencies while creating others, raising costs and splitting markets. This page sets out how geoeconomic fragmentation works, how it is measured, and what evidence serves the governments and firms that must navigate it.

02The question

Geoeconomics and fragmentation: how the risk develops.

Restrictions, market transmission and substitution. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Measures restrict and redirect

Export controls, sanctions and tariffs block or tax trade with particular partners. Trade often reroutes through third countries rather than stopping.

Mechanism

Subsidies relocate production

Industrial policies subsidise domestic or allied production of chips, batteries and clean technology. Others respond, and trade patterns shift over years.

Mechanism

Blocs form along alignment

Trade and investment grow faster between politically aligned countries. Fragmentation reduces efficiency gains from specialisation and can raise prices.

Mechanism

Retaliation compounds

Each measure invites a response. Escalating restrictions widen the set of goods affected and raise uncertainty for investment.

03Monitor

Corridor and chokepoint monitor.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Corridor and chokepoint monitor

Geoeconomics and fragmentation · Corridor A · Week 28

  • Transit time
    22days9Alert
  • Freight index
    21431Watch
  • Vessels rerouted
    57this weekWatch
  • Inventory cover
    37daysNormal
Chokepoint disruptionGCRI · Trade and Strategic Resources

Corridors

red: disrupted

Hub AHub BStraitPort hubHub EHub FTerminalChokepointN

Time to recover vs time to survive

by critical input

FertiliserStrait73Short
FuelStrait54Covered
SemiconductorsPort hub2411Short
GrainCorridor A28Covered
Corridor and chokepoint monitor: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Geoeconomics and fragmentation.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04Across the domains

Fragmentation changes costs and resilience across domains.

Fragmentation scenarios are designed for the Foresight Outlook series, labelled as scenarios. The IMF’s 2023 Staff Discussion Note and the WTO World Trade Report 2023 set out estimated costs and their wide ranges; the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) takes no position on any dispute.

  • Cases where a restriction reached a supply chain.
  • Critiques of fragmentation scenarios.
05Methods and evidence

How geoeconomics and fragmentation is modelled, measured and tested.

The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.

System model

The couplings between the systems in geoeconomics and fragmentation: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−+TradeIndustryCommunitiesEconomyR reinforcingB balancing
Causal loop diagram from the page’s systems; signs show the direction of influence. Illustrative structure for a system dynamics or network model, not estimated couplings.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
06Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Trade policy interventionscount of measures by typemonthlyTrade policy monitoring databasesREPORTED
Trade between geopolitical blocsshare of total tradequarterlyBilateral trade data with bloc classificationESTIMATED
Goods covered by export controlscount of product codesper changeGovernment control listsPublished statistics
Foreign direct investment screening decisionscount of reviews and blocksannualInvestment screening reportsPublished statistics
Average applied tariffpercentannualTariff databasesPublished statistics
Trade policy uncertaintyindex value from text analysismonthlyPublished uncertainty measuresESTIMATED
07Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
Global Trade AlertTrade policy interventions by country and typePublic, terms to check
WTO trade monitoring reports and Integrated DatabaseTrade measures and applied tariffsPublic, WTO terms
OECD investment screening reportsInvestment screening mechanisms and activityPublic, OECD terms
Authority export control and sanctions listsRestricted items, entities and countriesPublic records, licence per government
IMF and WTO analysis of geoeconomic fragmentationEstimates of fragmentation costs and trade shiftsPublic, terms per publisher
08Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Trade and Strategic Resources prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
Ministries of trade and foreign affairsHow to respond to and design trade measuresMeasure trackers; fragmentation scenarios
Firms with global supply chainsHow to adjust sourcing and investment to policy riskRerouting analyses; control lists
Multilateral institutionsHow to monitor and reduce fragmentation costsTrade monitoring evidence

Outputs this topic produces

  • Trade measure trackers for products and partners of interest
  • Rerouting analyses of trade through third countries
  • Scenarios of fragmentation effects on supply
  • Evidence notes for trade policy dialogues
09Core questions

What experts ask about fragmentation.

  • How do restrictions change trade flows, and how much trade is rerouted through third countries?
  • Which products and sectors are most affected, and how quickly can supply be substituted?
  • What are the costs of fragmentation, and who bears them?
  • How do retaliatory measures and policy uncertainty affect investment and supply decisions?
  • How does fragmentation interact with energy transitions and technology development?
10Mechanisms and drivers

How restrictions transmit.

Trade measures change relative prices and access. Importers seek alternative suppliers; exporters seek new markets; and some trade is rerouted through intermediary countries. In the short run, substitution is limited by capacity, qualification requirements and contracts, so restrictions raise prices and cause shortages. In the long run, supply chains reorganise, sometimes at higher cost.

Uncertainty is itself a channel. When firms expect policy to change, they may delay investment, build buffers or duplicate supply chains. These responses can increase resilience but also reduce efficiency and raise prices.

Measures can spread. Restrictions by one country can prompt responses by others, and broad categories of goods, such as technology or critical minerals, may become subject to overlapping controls.

11Methods and data

Methods and their limits.

  1. 01

    Gravity and trade models

    Econometric models of bilateral trade used to estimate effects of measures, using econometrics. Results depend on specification.

  2. 02

    Input-output analysis

    Tracing how restrictions on one sector affect others. Aggregation hides firm-level substitution.

  3. 03

    Policy databases

    Records of trade measures by product and country. Classification and coverage differ between sources.

  4. 04

    Network scenarios

    Simulating the removal of trade links using network science. Behavioural responses are simplified.

Estimates of fragmentation costs vary widely with assumptions about substitution and adjustment time, and are presented with their ranges.

12Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

13Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

14Questions

Questions and answers.

What is geoeconomic fragmentation?
A policy-driven reversal of global economic integration, in which trade, investment and technology flows are restricted or redirected along geopolitical lines.
What is friend-shoring?
Relocating supply chains to politically aligned countries to reduce exposure to rivals, at some cost in efficiency.
Do sanctions stop trade?
They restrict it, but trade often reroutes through third countries. Measuring the effect requires tracing flows across several partners.
Does the platform take positions on sanctions or tariffs?
No. It analyses effects with transparent methods and leaves policy choices to the competent authorities.
Does it give compliance guidance?
No. Compliance questions belong with legal advisers and the relevant authorities.
Is fragmentation always harmful?
The topic examines both costs and resilience effects. Diversification can reduce some risks while raising costs.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRITrade and Strategic ResourcesStrategic SystemsScenario and Stress-Test
Trade and Strategic Resources

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.